selectbutton
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile / Ignoring   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The new Macbook Air looks sweet as hell.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    selectbutton Forum Index -> GBF 120%
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Takashi



Joined: 04 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:01 pm        Reply with quote

Panoptic wrote:
Anyway, if I were in the market, I'd have one of these; I think I'd wait for the Penryn-core processors though. Either that, or a Thinkpad.
Hey, I'm typing on one of these. Albeit it isn't really mine, or really that one in a sense. It's alright, I guess.

Is this Apple's portable G4 Cube?
_________________


low-end.net | Whimsy (soon) | Serfdom 2.0

Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Takashi



Joined: 04 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:02 am        Reply with quote

Hey look, it's small!
And it lights up!
And it's so modern, stylish and what everybody obviously wants.

_________________


low-end.net | Whimsy (soon) | Serfdom 2.0

Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Takashi



Joined: 04 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:23 am        Reply with quote

The most amusing thing about Vista, is that the only thing that worked fine in XP, namely the ability that if you pressed Crtl+Alt+Del, you _would_ get the window with the task-manager / shut off buttons, even if the system was falling apart. Vista replaces that with a custom non-standard gui screen so heavy that crashes if a program is hoarding the processor, hence making it useless.

Also, Office 2007 is actually way different from Office 2003 in many ways. If anything, the closest thing to Office 2003 nowadays is erm, OpenOffice.

Thing is, my experience with the latter OSX aren't really any better than Vista.
I'll buy a Air when Steve decides to swap OSX for BeOS.

EDIT: On a side-note, most of the "resource hogging" of vista is part of a caching strategy. It's actually good, since it spares disc usage (and allows for readyboost technology, etc). The problem is that Vista doesn't let us control it in any significant way, so we just have to look at the memory go to whatever _it_ thinks is important.
_________________


low-end.net | Whimsy (soon) | Serfdom 2.0

Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Takashi



Joined: 04 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:26 pm        Reply with quote

!= wrote:
ssj-xordyh wrote:
The problem with Vista (or any OS) as an OS for gaming is that it _is_ an OS. What we really need is just a thin kernel that provides a standard API to the hardware, so that games don't have to compete with anything for system resources. I would rather boot into that for my games, and have a separate, full-featured OS for everything else, rather than try to balance tuning a general OS for both gaming and non-gaming tasks.


An advantage of such an OS is that it would not have a working browser, hence we would be gaming instead of posting on internet forums.

Just sayin' as someone who neither have a will, a 360 or a ps3 yet.
Not really. Again, BeOS - a single-user built, multitasking OS with a microkernel using fully dinamically loaded drivers, and designed around media creation, instead of a bloated BSD distro like OSX.
_________________


low-end.net | Whimsy (soon) | Serfdom 2.0

Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Takashi



Joined: 04 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:15 pm        Reply with quote

!= wrote:
Takashi wrote:
!= wrote:
ssj-xordyh wrote:
The problem with Vista (or any OS) as an OS for gaming is that it _is_ an OS. What we really need is just a thin kernel that provides a standard API to the hardware, so that games don't have to compete with anything for system resources. I would rather boot into that for my games, and have a separate, full-featured OS for everything else, rather than try to balance tuning a general OS for both gaming and non-gaming tasks.


An advantage of such an OS is that it would not have a working browser, hence we would be gaming instead of posting on internet forums.

Just sayin' as someone who neither have a will, a 360 or a ps3 yet.
Not really. Again, BeOS - a single-user built, multitasking OS with a microkernel using fully dinamically loaded drivers, and designed around media creation, instead of a bloated BSD distro like OSX.


BeOS did not really have a working web browser!
NetPositive was a pretty good browser, if we lived in 1995. There was a Opera build for BeOS, however.

As for OSX/Darwin XNU kernel, It's too frankenstein-ish for me. ALbeit I'm pretty sure my bad Tiger experience had nothing to do with it.
_________________


low-end.net | Whimsy (soon) | Serfdom 2.0

Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Quick Reply
 Attach signature
 Notify on replies

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    selectbutton Forum Index -> GBF 120% All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group