|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| physical vs. digital delivery, downloads, on demand. |
| physical copy |
|
69% |
[ 9 ] |
| not physical |
|
30% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 13 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Hot Stott Bot banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:18 am |
|
|
hd digital recordings in raw format psiga!
think about it!
does anyone do this yet?
i'm imagining big cameras wheeling around huge hard drive arrays behind them. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Corinth thatbox

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 am |
|
|
| Hot Stott Bot wrote: |
| I believe he means the latter. Why is that "sickening"? |
Well, I mean. They have the film, and they have the time. I don't see why they can't bracket the scans to take advantage of all the information present if the machine's range isn't wide enough to do it with one pass. I guess I just expected that The People with The Money were doing the best job possible, and the idea that they aren't is just kind of surprising.
| psiga wrote: |
| A little of both. You really think that 256 shades of R, G, and B are enough to capture everything that film has to offer? |
I sure hope they're not using hardware that bad! (They're not!)
Last edited by Corinth on Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:39 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Corinth thatbox

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:28 am |
|
|
| Hot Stott Bot wrote: |
hd digital recordings in raw format psiga!
think about it!
does anyone do this yet?
i'm imagining big cameras wheeling around huge hard drive arrays behind them. |
http://www.red.com/cameras
| Quote: |
| We deliver 12M pixels at up to 60fps and record wide dynamic range and color space 12 bit native RAW. |
This thing hit several months ago. It's incredible. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
psiga saudade

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am |
|
|
I'm not sure what the pro industry guys do with their scans. I presume that everybody does it differently, since there are no standards yet.
Apparently Vista has some sort of support for 'scRGB', which gives 16bits per pixel, floating point values. That ought to be enough to run an HDR display, but I'm not aware of any graphics cards or monitors which actually work in scRGB color space... _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Corinth thatbox

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:49 am |
|
|
| Yeah, I don't know of any displays or graphics cards like that either. But I'm sure that they're getting all of the exposure information out of the film in scanning; if they don't they're stupid. The technology for that exists now - even if your sensor doesn't have the range to do it in one take, you can do it in the same way that you'd bracket with your own digital camera. But since this is film, the scene doesn't change at all, so you could do it pretty much perfectly in four stop increments or however much you have to work with. You can certainly store such information, and even if you can't display it all on conventional displays (pro photographers and publishers keep this in mind because printers have a wider gamut than monitors) it increases the precision of any calculations or transformations you do. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Toptube Anti-cabbage Party Candidate
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:58 pm |
|
|
| currently, Blu-ray has a couple of things that aren't really being used yet. it supports Y Pb / Cb Pr / Cr Super-White, which the PS3 has included support for in an older update. also, HDMI 1.3 has a feature called "Deep Color" which BD movies could eventually support, but none currently do. the PS3 is like one of two BD players right now with an HDMI 1.3 connection. most are 1.2. Most HDTV are shipping now with 1.3 so I imagine "Deep Color" support in Blu-ray transfers will be starting pretty soon. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Corinth thatbox

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:57 pm |
|
|
| Stealth BD adverthread, amirite? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
falsedan

Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:38 pm |
|
|
| psiga wrote: |
I have a nasty habit of listing abbreviations of megabit and kilobit in lowercase, and megabyte and kilobyte in uppercase. Spoken this way, 40mbps is 5MBps.
I hate them for having bit and byte both starting with 'b', but what the fuck ever. |
probably stems from bit being abbreviated as 'b', and byte abbrev. as 'B'
pointless pedantry ensues _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|