|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| physical vs. digital delivery, downloads, on demand. |
| physical copy |
|
69% |
[ 9 ] |
| not physical |
|
30% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 13 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Hot Stott Bot
banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:23 pm |
  |
|
| thatbox wrote: |
| Emphasis mine. Lossless audio is a lot more practical than lossless video. |
Eh... only until someone invents a better codec for lossless video. Lossless audio was equally impractical a few years ago. |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
 |
Hot Stott Bot
banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:53 am |
|
|
| thatbox wrote: |
| psiga wrote: |
| The future will hold: 4k resolution, high dynamic range film scans. And possibly something along the lines of IMAX DMR, though I don't want to hold my breath on that. |
I'm curious about your mention of HDR film scans - do you mean that the current process doesn't get all (within reason) of the available exposure information out of the film, or that there is some film with a wider range that will come into use? The first possibility sickens me and the second is pretty exciting! |
I believe he means the latter. Why is that "sickening"?
Anyways, the real future is of course that we'll ditch film and use raw hd digital recordings! |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
|
Hot Stott Bot
banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:18 am |
|
|
hd digital recordings in raw format psiga!
think about it!
does anyone do this yet?
i'm imagining big cameras wheeling around huge hard drive arrays behind them. |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
