|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
glossolalia
Joined: 04 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:04 pm |
|
|
| did someone mention sigurd hosenfeld |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:57 pm |
|
|
| antitype wrote: |
| Killing in videogames is usually a means to an end, driven by some greater impetus, and it's understood as such by the player -- even if some games make killing a very enjoyable thing to do. |
Only in shitty videogames. In any good videogame, the main mechanic is its own reward. Stringing you along with "goals" ("achievements" "MMOs") is a halfassed solution to a boring game. _________________ Let's Play, starring me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
evnvnv hapax legomenon

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: the los angeles
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:05 pm |
|
|
after briefly browsing this article i was reminded of something i read the other day (i wish i could remember the exact quote...) saying that the real middle class objection to prostitution was not the degrading of sex by its association with money, but the degrading of money by its association with sex
so replace 'money' with 'video games' and you might be able to come up with a new twist on the argument going on in this thread (don't soil my sterile video game playing experience with the implication that someone else's video game might be tempting them to sin!!)
ok so there might be something 'funny' about taking any kind of kitsch object seriously enough to debate furiously, and perhaps simply discussing the merits of the best porno games is not the most insightful analysis, but hentai games and pornography in general make up such a large part of the current proliferation of interactive media, there's no reason why it shouldn't be discussed
ironically it seems like antitype, who is the most averse to talking about it, is the one who is making many of the most interesting comments. i don't think that its necessary to assume that everybody who plays/buys/fetishizes porno video games is some kind of horrible pervert caricature, but thinking about the kind of sex that is most prevalent in these games is kind of peculiar. but like antitype says, violence is the easiest way of expressing conflict--so is the fact that sex in most games is treated as a reward that is gained by and given to one person a reflection of some kind of psychological deformity on behalf of the player or is it the same as a violent videogame--if an inherent goal of video games is to present conflict and 'challenges' is violence always going to be a product of that?
if sex games weren't so focused on 'deviant' sex would people still be offended by them?
i dont know i think this thread is interesting, but it also seems like what really irks people is just the intimation that porn games and 'normal' games have a lot more in common than they're willing to admit. if it's as simple as that... |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:27 pm |
|
|
| evnvnv wrote: |
| if sex games weren't so focused on 'deviant' sex would people still be offended by them? |
I suspect they would, because they'd still be porn and that itself is a deviance, plus antitype's original jab was actually pointed not at the deviant sex, since the aspects he mentioned were from the tamer categories. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
evnvnv hapax legomenon

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: the los angeles
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:55 pm |
|
|
| chevluh wrote: |
| evnvnv wrote: |
| if sex games weren't so focused on 'deviant' sex would people still be offended by them? |
I suspect they would, because they'd still be porn and that itself is a deviance, plus antitype's original jab was actually pointed not at the deviant sex, since the aspects he mentioned were from the tamer categories. |
i guess i should have modified that statement because i don't know that i've been convinced that anyone posting in this thread is actually offended by these games, just kind of grossed out or uninterested. but surely someone, somewhere has to be? i guess they're not really popular enough in the states to warrant a moralistic reaction, but one would think that perhaps in japan this kind of reaction would exist? i don't know. i suppose dating games are sort of like the less "morally reprehensible" version of porn games just like there are 'nonviolent' video games
i'm also kind of intrigued by the increasing presence of sex (as a way to make a game more 'realistic') in ostensibly non-pornographic games... stuff like GTA or fable etc. where having 'intimate relations' with other people is like a side feature of the game. is there any way to do this without seeming a little bit childish? the same way i've never been able to really figure out why i find sex scenes in movies so irritating... its like simulated sex just kind of reminds me that the entire thing is fake and it becomes boring..all i can think about is what the actors were thinking about when they were getting ready to film their sex scene and how awkward it would be to be naked in front of like, steven speilberg...not how it relates to the actual plot or emotions of the characters... even though i'm obviously aware that the movie / game i'm watching isn't 'real,' and don't derive any kind of enjoyment from pretending that it is. is there an 'uncanny valley' of sex? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:21 pm |
|
|
Regarding the moralistic reaction I suspect those who'd be prone to it mostly overlap with those who are against violence in games, and to them game distributed using mainstream channels are a much easier target. It's more efficient going after violent games (or even GTA and Mass Effect that have sex in them even though they're more than tame by eroge standards) because they're omnipresent.
It's less of a niche in japan, but I think it's still a niche. Though I have trouble understanding the otaku subculture there so I may be underestimating matters on that account. In fact, a bit of googling indicates the japanese diet had at least two petitions for bans this year, though it never resulted in anything (even the ban that was more specifically aimed at depictions of minor characters). Apparently it falls within their views on the freedom of speech. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:10 pm |
|
|
| Talbain wrote: |
| antitype wrote: |
| God, I can't believe hardly anyone else finds this even a tiny bit hilarious. |
The reason is because adults can take erotic forms seriously, even if they find them objectionable in some way. |
No, I think you're not getting it. Hentai games are not just any "erotic forms", they're a weird beast of their own and I think they beg to be taken very un-seriously. Nice try, though.
| Jam wrote: |
| I'm with you on a lot of this man, but I'm not about to wade into this quagmire. It's the kind of thing I just shake my head at and move on. |
Haha, yeah, I hear you. I keep responding because I dug this hole for myself and people apparently have questions that I feel shouldn't really need any answering. Your response is by far the better one.
So yeah, it has mainly been dating sims that I've been picking on here.
If it means anything, something like the random sex scene in GTA: San Andreas doesn't bother me at all, largely because I think it was put there more as a joke than a device for lonely people to gain some kind of retarded emotional/sexual release.
| CubaLibre wrote: |
| antitype wrote: |
| Killing in videogames is usually a means to an end, driven by some greater impetus, and it's understood as such by the player -- even if some games make killing a very enjoyable thing to do. |
Only in shitty videogames. In any good videogame, the main mechanic is its own reward. Stringing you along with "goals" ("achievements" "MMOs") is a halfassed solution to a boring game. |
Or, you know, there's actually something going on in the narrative that means you're probably going to end up busting some heads open to survive and make it to the next plot point. I'm not just talking about superficially imposed videogame goals, e.g. achievements.
I am thinking I should pretty much stop talking now, not because DAIS thinks I have no argument, but because my very simple assertion that hentai games (dating sims in particular) are amusing/pathetic (in very much the same way that Portable Island is pathetic) is something that a surprising many of you take issue with. It's not because I do not take sex or "erotic forms" seriously. It doesn't have anything to do with "sin" or me thinking that sexual content and masturbation are tarnishing my precious videogames. We've covered this a few times already though, and I think all I can do now is repeat myself. I don't want to think about this anymore. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
dessgeega damaged

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:46 pm |
|
|
thread needs less self-righteous prudes telling the rest of us what are and aren't legitimate avenues for us to experience our sexuality _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:56 pm |
|
|
"the rest of us"
that's right, express your solidarity
let those self-righteous prudes have their real sex and human relationships!
by the way, i'm not telling you that your chosen avenue is not "legitimate", i'm telling you i think it's funny and sad. please take yourself a little bit more seriously. rraarrgh more indignant rage. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:56 pm |
|
|
| Antitype, the root of my issue with what you've said isn't even that your assertion those games are amusing/pathetic, it's your assertion we shouldn't be allowed to discuss them as a result. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:00 am |
|
|
| I think this assertion that they should not be discussed at all was inferred, and not really what I meant. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:06 am |
|
|
The fact that from early on you've been deriding the very subject and some of the posters, and posting such encouraging bits as
| Quote: |
| fucking keep it to yourself. |
| Quote: |
| I would have thought these forums would be the last place the eroge genre would be met with any sort of glorification, or anything less than pure ridicule |
were encouraging us to infer this meaning, I'm afraid. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:25 am |
|
|
True, true. I guess I chose to take a slightly more diplomatic approach after a bit.
The "keep it to yourself" line is slightly out of context when quoted that way, though. I was mainly directing that at specific examples of "yeah, I rubbed one out to that scene" in reference to an eroge where you fuck a beached mermaid or something.
However, I guess after changing my tone a bit throughout this thread I'm obligated to revise my statement. I don't think the genre should not be discussed at all, but I personally think it should be discussed with more of a sense of humor and perhaps a bit of self-deprecation. I mean, if I played hentai games I would not tell my real-life friends that I did (let alone try to talk about them seriously, as videogames or even as porn) unless I wanted to be a little bit humiliated. Maybe that's just me. And it is not because of any prudishness -- I simply prefer deal with sex in terms of other thinking, feeling human beings, not in terms of anime girls drawn and made to be everything you (or your inner rapist) might want them to be. I do think the glorification of such media is a bit shameful. But hey, I'm not here to tell anyone what they can't do... |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
dessgeega damaged

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:30 am |
|
|
| antitype wrote: |
| let those self-righteous prudes have their real sex and human relationships! |
not to make this personal, but i have better sex than you
so stop implying it's somehow macho to run around this thread screaming "EW! COOTIES!" _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
evnvnv hapax legomenon

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: the los angeles
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:40 am |
|
|
| antitype wrote: |
I am thinking I should pretty much stop talking now, not because DAIS thinks I have no argument, but because my very simple assertion that hentai games (dating sims in particular) are amusing/pathetic (in very much the same way that Portable Island is pathetic) is something that a surprising many of you take issue with. It's not because I do not take sex or "erotic forms" seriously. It doesn't have anything to do with "sin" or me thinking that sexual content and masturbation are tarnishing my precious videogames. We've covered this a few times already though, and I think all I can do now is repeat myself. I don't want to think about this anymore. |
I wish you weren't taking this so personally. To me it isn't really an issue of "defending" or "attacking" these kinds of games...I don't really take any issue whatsoever with saying that these games are pathetic. In fact I think I've realized that what is weird about the phenomenon is, like sex scenes in movies, it kind of forces me to realize that the entire medium is in many ways 'pathetic.'
I mean porno games are a niche product but I think they are fulfilling to the people that enjoy them for many of the same reasons (in an exaggerated form) that people play 'normal' video games. You don't have to look very hard on the internet to find people that have the same kind of peculiar obsession with non-sex oriented video game characters that you've identified as being common among people who play porno games, and discussion of those things has certainly never been unwelcome here. I mean I admit I have a certain kind of sympathy for people who are terminally obsessed with things like mega man and super mario brothers because of my own nostalgic obsession. I don't know that you can necessarily draw that firm a line between that and people who've for some reason turned cartoon characters into fetish objects.
Perhaps this thread was made only to discuss the merits of these games as sex toys, in that case it's probably fine if you no longer want to participate in the discussion and leave it to those that actually do... but to me it's more interesting than just dividing things in to one side of people that is 'in to' porno games and the other side that finds it pathetic and unworthy of any attention whatsoever. It doesn't have to be that simple!
FAKE EDIT: as per your last post I guess it makes more sense. Though, since you obviously don't masturbate to porno video games, it might not be too crazy to assume that perhaps you would think differently about talking about it if you actually did do it ;-). I guess I get equally embarrassed about talking about 'normal' video games with people off the internet, too. Your "inner rapist" comment is probably going to piss a lot of people off, but I suppose its a valid point in the same way that violent video games appeal to the "inner serial murderer" in all of us (or maybe even worse, "inner violent enforcer of moral right"). I mean I think it is OK to just state that plenty of people believe that it is possible to discern fantasy from an unfulfilled desire to act.
Last edited by evnvnv on Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:40 am |
|
|
| dessgeega wrote: |
| antitype wrote: |
| let those self-righteous prudes have their real sex and human relationships! |
not to make this personal, but i have better sex than you |
Haha, how the fuck would you know what kind of sex I have?
Don't pretend you're not trying to make it personal, as if you'd have any basis for doing so.
| dessgeega wrote: |
| so stop implying it's somehow macho to run around this thread screaming "EW! COOTIES!" |
Wait, I'm trying to be macho now? I thought I was just laughing at you and your ongoing fits of indignation. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:48 am |
|
|
| evnvnv wrote: |
| Perhaps this thread was made only to discuss the merits of these games as sex toys, in that case it's probably fine if you no longer want to participate in the discussion and leave it to those that actually do... but to me it's more interesting than just dividing things in to one side of people that is 'in to' porno games and the other side that finds it pathetic and unworthy of any attention whatsoever. It doesn't have to be that simple! |
This is a perfectly reasonable argument, and it's why I keep hinting at being ready to step aside and let the thread go back to its original direction now that I've come along and completely disrupted it. I didn't actually think my comments would encourage so much other, uh, discussion (or silly huffing and puffing from dessgeega). |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:56 am |
|
|
Regarding how we should approach the subject it's ultimately up to each poster to choose his own angle. We're not even really been glorifying it, merely discussing it normally. A security cushion of humor can be useful for some of us to have extra comfort about what they type but ultimately we're not comparable to real-life friends.
Acting behind the masks of netpeople, however thin they may be, allows us to take more straightforward approaches because ultimately we're here for what we discuss, not who we are. Many of the people I know in real life I won't even talk much about games with, let alone game mechanics, the occasional wiimote waggling at a friend's being their deepest experience with the subject (and let's not talk about explaining them how I find the oldschool design choices wonderful in a game where you can conquer japan while acting like a gleefully chaotic Don Juan, to put it mildly). That's why I can go online to more specialized forums, or for further niche subjets like this one topics, to be able to discuss it without dancing around the subject. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:10 am |
|
|
Understood, and I really appreciate such a reasonable retort to everything I've said. I really have been a bit obnoxious.
Carry on, then! I'm off to get some beers and catch a movie with a friend anyway... |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Intentionally Wrong

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 4:10 am |
|
|
Sorry this thread broke down "that way", antitype. It's the voices of dissent that make these discussions worthwhile for me, and I didn't feel like yours ever struck the wrong tone. _________________ JSNLV is frequently and intentionally wrong. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
scratchmonkey Final Finasty

Joined: 21 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 5:13 am |
|
|
I really don't think the thread broke down at all. Then again, this is the kind of stuff that I like to discuss.
(Especially since I don't actually like/play erogames.)
I guess I have another question for you antitype, if you don't mind: What's the difference, if there is one, between h-games and regular hentai that makes the games more morally questionable/pathetic? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:58 am |
|
|
I guess it's just that I feel hentai games are a bit too enabling for anyone seeking some form of interaction (said simulation of "seduction" or "flirtation" or in worse case scenarios "rape") when there are better/healthier ways of seeking this (minus the rape of course), even if they may seem a bit scarier or more hopeless (i.e. talking to real girls and not necessarily with the sole intention of using them for sexual gratification).
Sort of like how I thought it was weird how, when I was still playing WoW, a guildie confided in me that WoW was curing her social anxiety. Prescribed medication: epics! I mean, I don't need to say much more than that. MMOs, actual healthy social interaction? Solely based on the acquisition of gear? You follow...
Anyway, I think it's the illusion of control and how this seems to be treated as an escape from or an alternative to real relationships and sexual encounters that creeps me out a little. Even online dating is not a valid comparison because you are still dealing with real people and there is some likelihood that the absolute guaranteed end result is not pure sexual fantasy. Rejection remains a possibility!
@Intentionally Wrong, I will fully admit that my initial posts here came off as way too aggressive, but like I said I wasn't expecting them to cause such an uproar. I want to reiterate that I'm not here to express self-righteous moral outrage and tell anyone what they can or can't do. Just saying what I think. To put it as plainly as I can: I think that a simulation of flirtation/seduction and ultimately sex is rather boring and a bit odd compared to the real thing. But then, I've never been into serious roleplay, either, so maybe this is just me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
idle QUAD DAMAGE!!!

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:15 am |
|
|
| antitype wrote: |
| To put it as plainly as I can: I think that a simulation of flirtation/seduction and ultimately sex is rather boring and a bit odd compared to the real thing. But then, I've never been into serious roleplay, either, so maybe this is just me. |
Well then we're just heading back into the old Guitar Hero "learn to play a real guitar" territory again. Like you said, there are inevitably going to be people who use eroge as a substitute for real interpersonal relations or other such unhealthy behavior, but that's something that comes with any form of escapism. You can't necessarily judge a form of media by the people who consume it, let alone the worst examples of them.
I think what you were saying about eroge discussion needing a certain degree of humor/self-depreciation just betrays the fact that you aren't comfortable talking about this sort of thing. I can't think of any subject that can't or shouldn't be discussed in all seriousness. If you need that sort of levity it implies that you just feel guilty discussing it in the first place, in my opinion.
That said I was sort of surprised to see this thread show up here. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:37 am |
|
|
| idle wrote: |
| Well then we're just heading back into the old Guitar Hero "learn to play a real guitar" territory again. |
Or you guys can just stop trying to apply my reasoning here to other contexts. I'm not talking about Guitar Hero.
I don't feel guilty having this discussion. I'm here expressing my own point of view, and pretty comfortable with it. I've even adjusted my disposition a bit as others have offered their own well thought out responses, so it's not like I'm being some completely dogmatic antagonist -- I'm open to taking other views on the subject into consideration (but I'm going to keep laughing as long as so-and-so comes along barking at me with childish tantrums or goofy attempts at personal jabs, because, well... that's just entertaining). |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:53 am |
|
|
Actually I think the guitar hero mention is fair. It's important to keep in mind it's obvious the games are a hardly comparable to the real thing. That's a big part of what makes them games, and the guitar hero mention is relevant in that not being (or not even trying to be, because there is no real thing in this world a videogame could actually reproduce, barring other videogames) like the real thing doesn't prevent them from being enjoyable in their own right, in fact it can contribute a lot to said enjoyment.
Pong's success came from the fact that, while immediately identifiable as a parallel to table tennis, it was very much its own thing, with its own possibility space. The same is true for all game genres, including eroge. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 10:03 am |
|
|
| I now feel I have served my purpose in this thread and I am more interested in seeing what else you might have to say than putting forth my own perceptions any further -- perceptions which remain generally the same, though I really do appreciate some of the points you guys are making. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
DonMarco graphics fucker
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:31 pm |
|
|
What arguement against erotic games couldn't be applied to other media? Why jerk off to Playboy instead of going out and finding a real woman? Why watch a porno instead of calling that one girl back and maybe getting lucky?
Bottom line?? It's a fucking easy as hell alternative. Masturbation is cheaper, safer and more readily available alternative when the mood hits. Be it using your imagination, a novel, magazine, movie, TV, computer, or "other". By "other" I mean a real-live person.
Video games are so ingrained as non-erotic in the States it's a fucking crime. Same with cartoons. So you know anything that combined eroticism, video games and cartoons will be beyond taboo. Hell, anyone that actively searches for, plays, or even talks about erotic games is branded a loser even furries won't associate with. Even in the states, they're more likely to say "eroge" or "hentai games" to avoid saying what they are.
Also! There are plenty of erotic games that target women. They are either explicitly reverse-roll dating sims or those more romantic games that value story over gameplay.
...
Final thoughts? I'm looking forward to UltraPorn, myself. _________________ Still alive. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 5:05 pm |
|
|
| antitype wrote: |
| CubaLibre wrote: |
| antitype wrote: |
| Killing in videogames is usually a means to an end, driven by some greater impetus, and it's understood as such by the player -- even if some games make killing a very enjoyable thing to do. |
Only in shitty videogames. In any good videogame, the main mechanic is its own reward. Stringing you along with "goals" ("achievements" "MMOs") is a halfassed solution to a boring game. |
Or, you know, there's actually something going on in the narrative that means you're probably going to end up busting some heads open to survive and make it to the next plot point. I'm not just talking about superficially imposed videogame goals, e.g. achievements. |
Again, those "narrative" goals are pretty weak when videogame narratives are almost universally weak. If the mechanical act itself is not enjoyable, the game will not be enjoyable, no matter how compelling you think the narrative is. I didn't get Gordon Freeman out of Black Mesa because I felt sympathetic with his need to survive and the violence was merely a means to this end; I got him out because the combat in Half-Life is really fun; the narrative superstructure made the combat more fun, not the other way around.
As applied to eroge, one of the reasons the genre seems so pathetic is that, in general, the "mechanics" of the games are weak or nonexistent. It's baldly "means to an end" gameplay which is laughable no matter the end - that the end is "to whack off" just makes it seem all the more risible. It's a one-player MMO where the "epic gear" is different cartoon girls' boobs. Note that I'm not critiquing jerking off to cartoon girl boobs per se, but rather the idea of "playing" a terrible "game" to win the right to do so.
Some people have offered examples of games that ostensibly have legitimately good gameplay (man I hate that word). Well, I haven't played them, so I can't say. I can say that even the best eroge (game-wise) seems to pale in comparison to any game that we hold mechanically up on a pedestal, God Hand or Quake 1 or SMB. I daresay that if an amazingly mechanically tight game also featured a lot of naked people fucking, we'd never call it eroge in the first place, because the whole genre of "eroge" is fundamentally based around easy/nonexistent gameplay leading to whack material. I mean no one thinks Shadow Warrior is an eroge because you can find secret naked hentai chicks. There's too much actual game built around it. _________________ Let's Play, starring me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Chris B

Joined: 06 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:10 pm |
|
|
| CubaLibre wrote: |
As applied to eroge, one of the reasons the genre seems so pathetic is that, in general, the "mechanics" of the games are weak or nonexistent. It's baldly "means to an end" gameplay which is laughable no matter the end - that the end is "to whack off" just makes it seem all the more risible. It's a one-player MMO where the "epic gear" is different cartoon girls' boobs. Note that I'm not critiquing jerking off to cartoon girl boobs per se, but rather the idea of "playing" a terrible "game" to win the right to do so.
Some people have offered examples of games that ostensibly have legitimately good gameplay (man I hate that word). Well, I haven't played them, so I can't say. I can say that even the best eroge (game-wise) seems to pale in comparison to any game that we hold mechanically up on a pedestal, God Hand or Quake 1 or SMB. |
This sounds like you're only looking at the physicality of a videogame's mechanics, but this isn't the only aspect.
All three games you mentioned are highly physical games.
I like Claus Pais' approach, which is pretty simple and said that videogames can be:
* time critical (real-time applications requiring attention & hand-eye coordination)
* decision-critical (require right judgements to traverse decision-trees)
* configuration-critical (require patience for optimal regulation of interdependent values)
This corresponds to action (PONG and the games you mentioned), adventure (point & click stuff and many eroge titles) and strategy (Sim City).
Of course many games are a mix of two or all:
Zelda = action + adventure
Dragon Quest = adventure + strategy
C&C = strategy + action
Physicality or the "joy of movement" isn't everything.
Last edited by Chris B on Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:31 pm |
|
|
| CubaLibre wrote: |
| I mean no one thinks Shadow Warrior is an eroge because you can find secret naked hentai chicks. There's too much actual game built around it. |
Well no, Shadow Warriors isn't one because the actual game isn't built around it at all, what little vaguely erotic material there is is tacked on in such a minor way you could swap it with flower pots and not have to change even one other byte of the game, and it wouldn't feel even slightly out of place.
| CubaLibre wrote: |
| I daresay that if an amazingly mechanically tight game also featured a lot of naked people fucking, we'd never call it eroge in the first place, because the whole genre of "eroge" is fundamentally based around easy/nonexistent gameplay leading to whack material. |
That bit's much more interesting, though, I really wonder about that. While the bulk of it is currently rather shallow dating sims or adventure games (though the dating sim mechanic did debut as the one gameplay innovation of the genre, it's been cloned to hell and back) there are a few (blahblah Rance 6 and 7 blahblah, well, you know the drill) games in the genre I consider to be mechanically tight. One of the drawbacks I could see is they are quite a few years backwards technologically, though it's an aspect they have in common with other indie games. And I think the "lot of people fucking" *is* a hell of an obstacle too, that would cause most people to overlook that hypothetical game. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:40 pm |
|
|
| Chris B wrote: |
| Physicality or the "joy of movement" isn't everything. |
I didn't mean to imply that "mechanical tightness" (quite a loose phrase) was merely physical. If the guy that wrote the Zork text adventures, for instance, wrote one with explicit sex scenes, it would still be a good text adventure and not a lame eroge. Or say if the Fallout 2 sex scenes were totally explicit instead of "fade to black" affairs - suddenly the game would have a heavily erotic element and yet the game is actually good and therefore wouldn't carry that gamer stigma (although a "mainstream media" stigma would almost certainly still attach - see Mass Effect). Daggerfall and Ultima 7 both had blatantly naked chicks doing erotic dances, as well.
Or to come at it from the other side, Leisure Suit Larry is much-maligned in the adventure community. It's not because of its lame softcore-cheesecake theme, it's because they're bad adventure games. If they were good adventure games, the lame softcore-cheesecake theme would come across as funny and good-natured and titillating. Unfortunately, it seems as though designers see the "guaranteed sales" of sexually explicit content as an excuse to withhold resources and produce the game on the cheap. Not that this is any different from porn in any other medium. _________________ Let's Play, starring me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
mothman spirit
Joined: 04 Nov 2008
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:29 am |
|
|
oh hi insomnia.
By the way, Cuba, I understand your argument about gameplay leading narrative, but I can come up with examples to counter that: Skies of Arcadia was a game whose painfully slow battles I slogged through only to see more of the game and its world and story. Mother 3's battle system is not so compelling to me, and yet I play the game. It's all "means to an end" gameplay. Yes, a game like HL2 seems to draw more attention to its combat because you enjoy it so much, but can you/do you really ignore what's going on around you? It's a narrative drive far more elaborate than "get to the the final boss". That the combat happens to be enjoyable is of equally important consideration, but in my opinion a game is better when its gameplay does not feel like something tacked on to move you through the world (hi jRPGS, hi retarded Zelda puzzles, hi "games that play yourselves" (need a better term for that)) but instead something that functions as a more naturally involving element, and HL2 succeeds in that regard. So again, quoting myself:
| Quote: |
| Killing in videogames is usually a means to an end, driven by some greater impetus, and it's understood as such by the player -- even if some games make killing a very enjoyable thing to do. |
Nowhere did I say it couldn't be its own reward, but it's still there as a demonstration of the conflict you (in the role of your character) seek to resolve.
That Bradford dude got it all wrong, by the way.
| Bradford wrote: |
| Frathouse gangbang is sublime but "Fake Anime Girl" is distasteful? |
Er, no. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:02 am |
|
|
http://www.alafista.com/2008/05/17/figure-auctioned-for-15-million-usd/
Anyone else see this? Kinda nutty (NSFW obviously).
Re-iterating that linking to Pikachu is just what he wants you to do and that eroge games do not have to be about great gameplay (or whatever term you prefer Cuba). In fact it's surprising that many interesting stories spawn from the h-game genre, for whatever reason - each story in Fate/Stay Night is roughly a novel in length for example. Actually perhaps it's not surprising, in the same way that corny romance scenes in romance novels are not surprising. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:11 am |
|
|
| Quote: |
While I kinda understand this is art, but personally I still don’t understand why would people pay millions of dollars to buy this kind of art?!
With that kind of money, I can get Alter or GSC to make me an awesome Haurhi 1:1 figure or something. |
lol |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
glossolalia
Joined: 04 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:54 am |
|
|
| in a way he's right though, i'd rather gawk at "real" crazy hentai than murakami's watered-down version |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
nakysnaky
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:19 am |
|
|
| Is anyone else planning on replying to every comment antitype makes about any video game ever with "yeah, I rubbed one out to that scene"? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:50 am |
|
|
| oh what have i done |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
bloody heartland banned
Joined: 15 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:03 am |
|
|
| dessgeega wrote: |
| antitype wrote: |
| let those self-righteous prudes have their real sex and human relationships! |
not to make this personal, but i have better sex than you |
You have boring, pretentious sex with ugly people you talk about in boring horrible detail
(Because you're boring and pretentious) |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
bloody heartland banned
Joined: 15 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:04 am |
|
|
| I tried to tell the man in the shop I was buying DOA: Xtreme Beach Volleyball as a legitimate avenue to express my sexuality but he kept laughing at me anyway what did I do wrong dess |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|