|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
GalaxyHead

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Discrimination of male social status by female hamsters
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:09 pm Post subject: How to make windows vista less annoying? |
|
|
I have a new computer with Vista, but I haven't tampered with it yet. I hear it is fairly annoying, though I have no knowledge of what makes it so. Any suggestions?
Pondering installing XP instead. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
analogos bravely default crying fairy

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:21 pm |
|
|
| Why don't you actually give it a chance to present itself as annoying before worrying about it either way? It's just as likely that we'd convince you of something you may have not even given a shit about otherwise. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GalaxyHead

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Discrimination of male social status by female hamsters
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:24 pm |
|
|
| I plan on doing this. Vista just gets a bad rep amongst my computer nerd friends, and I haven't had a new OS since XP. I figured I'd get a head start. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BalbanesBeoulve Malicious Bastard

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:51 pm |
|
|
The annoying things are the constant warnings whenever you open a program or try to install something. It's vista's stupid ass way to provide security or something.
Just go to the security section in the control panel and turn off "User Account Control." After turning that off I haven't found it much different from XP. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BenoitRen I bought RAM

Joined: 05 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 7:03 pm |
|
|
Vista? You should have gotten XP with it. Install XP and your machine will fly! Vista is just bloat, and I speak from first-hand experience. _________________ Get Xenoblade Chronicles!
| udoschuermann wrote: |
| Whenever I read things like "id like to by a new car," I cringe inside, imagine some grunting ape who happened across a keyboard, and move on without thinking about the attempted message. |
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Toups tyranically banal

Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Location: Ebon Keep
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 7:09 pm |
|
|
Listen to BenoitRen. He speaks from first-hand experience. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
psiga saudade

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 7:27 pm |
|
|
After I got past all of the warning alerts, and tweaked my laptop to not turn the fan to maximum at all times (probably not Vista's fault), Vista stopped being obnoxious. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
sawtooth heh

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: flashback
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:24 pm |
|
|
i've seen many people use vista before with no complaints but they weren't usability nerds get a mac lol _________________ ( ( |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Laurel Soup

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Hitsville, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:38 pm |
|
|
| Unless you're constantly moving stuff around in your Program Files folder Vista isn't that bad at all. The UAC thing is just a slightly clunkier version of UNIX's sudo thing. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
extrabastardformula millmuck holecutter

Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Location: The Nearest Faraway Place
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:59 pm |
|
|
Turn Aero off, and install the updates, because out of the box is kinda ugh. Also download 7zip and NEVER open compressed folders with the file manager. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
manmachine plays jazz Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:02 pm |
|
|
| install xp |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Lestrade Mary McMoePanties

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:22 pm |
|
|
I like Vista just fine. I'm a lapsed Windows user who has been using Macs for 11 years or so, and after getting used to Vista again, I'm pretty impressed. I love Aero and if you customize your system tray properties to hide most notifications, it's a nice, simple, out of the way, experience.
Windows 7 looks really nice, with lots of very welcome improvements, but I think the hoo-ha over Vista isn't warranted. _________________ Illustration Portfolio | The Gamer's Quarter |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
km

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Minor character in a frame story
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:31 am |
|
|
I thought I would hate Vista, but I installed it on my new laptop and I actually really, really like it. Turn off UAC yeah, but wow, the OS is actually really solid. I can't actually think of anything I don't like about it.
The whole new look is really lovely too. The new icons are classy, Aero looks great, and the font rendering is excellent.
Explorer is a little different but once you're used to it really an improvement over XP.
Networking finally doesn't suck. Discovery is really fast and painless, and file transfers are orders of magnitude faster than before.
Even the copy file dialog is improved! _________________
vi) RPGs (Role-Playing Games)
For adolescents; half-formed personalities roaming (in packs) in search of identity. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BIGJ420COOLDUDE

Joined: 04 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:27 am |
|
|
yeah i use vista on my main computer even though i could be doing just fine in linux or whatever
quick recs:
use launchy
use dexpot for virtual desktops
i actually leave uac on because it's kind of there for a reason (though it is really poorly implemented).
it would be nice to be able to turn off aero without also losing hardware windowing acceleration.
there's some way to define the default style of all your folders in explorer (so it doesn't try to figure out your media folders and give everything different styles) but i forget how.
vista basically got a lot better in sp1--the only people saying it sucks nowadays are the slashdot gallery. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GalaxyHead

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Discrimination of male social status by female hamsters
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:49 am |
|
|
Guys I don't have a copy of XP except some illegal slipstreamed one and I don't trust it.
This computer came with vista and its service pack 2 installed. I didn't feel like paying them 150 bucks more to put XP on it. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:05 am |
|
|
| BenoitRen wrote: |
| Vista? You should have gotten XP with it. Install XP and your machine will fly! Vista is just bloat, and I speak from first-hand experience. |
Vista is just bloat. I also speak from firsthand experience.
I used it for about a week on XPS1330 before I got tired of its bullshit. Also, opening a goddamn window took a week (and before I turned off the stupid security bullshit, got a message every time I tried to open a freaking window). With XP? Windows come up instantly and I can have forty of them up without getting lag whenever I try to switch between them. No security BS either.
I still want to move to Linux, but the emulators available for Linux are all pretty piss poor (other than bsnes I guess, but that runs on Windows too). _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ebrey
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:41 am |
|
|
| My friend got a new lap top with Vista and it crashes every 10 minutes. Would downloading Support Pack 1 fix that? It's really awful. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
psiga saudade

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:04 am |
|
|
| Ebrey wrote: |
| My friend got a new lap top with Vista and it crashes every 10 minutes. Would downloading Support Pack 1 fix that? It's really awful. |
Totally recommending downloading all support packs. My laptop with Vista and the latest SP on it has been stable and smooth. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Touran

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 9:29 am |
|
|
| km wrote: |
I thought I would hate Vista, but I installed it on my new laptop and I actually really, really like it. Turn off UAC yeah, but wow, the OS is actually really solid. I can't actually think of anything I don't like about it.
The whole new look is really lovely too. The new icons are classy, Aero looks great, and the font rendering is excellent.
Explorer is a little different but once you're used to it really an improvement over XP.
Networking finally doesn't suck. Discovery is really fast and painless, and file transfers are orders of magnitude faster than before.
Even the copy file dialog is improved! |
KM is 100% correct, I agree with him on all accounts.
I really thought I would hate it, but after using it I realized it's not junk. The crap it gets is mostly from uninformed people, and users who can't grasp that you can customize it. Or people that have an Axe to grind.
I'm running Ultimate, the other versions are gimped in various ways unfortunately.
And you can remove features you don't want or need easily enough.
Aside from messing with UAC, make sure you turn off Windows Update to download automatically, and that you configure the rest of the automatic maintenance tools to whatever you want. _________________ Man, I'm sorry. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:17 am |
|
|
| psiga wrote: |
| Ebrey wrote: |
| My friend got a new lap top with Vista and it crashes every 10 minutes. Would downloading Support Pack 1 fix that? It's really awful. |
Totally recommending downloading all support packs. My laptop with Vista and the latest SP on it has been stable and smooth. |
Mine has been rock-solid since install, before SP1.
I'd say it probably has more to do with the thing's bloatware, if he got it from a typical computer place (Dell etc.). _________________ Let's Play, starring me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:21 am |
|
|
The only thing that I really like about Vista is that there's drivers for it. A lot of hardware manufacturers are phasing out XP support unfortunately. I guess extra RAM recognition is nice as well, but that doesn't really mean much to me since my computer hits the max amount that XP can handle anyway. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BenoitRen I bought RAM

Joined: 05 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:01 pm |
|
|
| GalaxyHead wrote: |
| This computer came with vista and its service pack 2 installed. |
There is no Service Pack 2 for Vista.
| Touran wrote: |
| users who can't grasp that you can customize it |
I shouldn't have to customise my OS just to get it running decently. _________________ Get Xenoblade Chronicles!
| udoschuermann wrote: |
| Whenever I read things like "id like to by a new car," I cringe inside, imagine some grunting ape who happened across a keyboard, and move on without thinking about the attempted message. |
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GalaxyHead

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Discrimination of male social status by female hamsters
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:55 pm |
|
|
| Quote: |
| There is no Service Pack 2 for Vista. |
I meant SP1. Whatever. It has some kind of pack.
I bought a Dell and I wager I will be spending most of my time uninstalling shit I don't want, but I don't really mind.
So I'll give vista a shot (still haven't set up the computer, too busy) what is a recommended list of things I should turn off for higher performance and where are they located? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
spinach hardline radical martian

Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Location: San Francisco, CA, USA!
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:59 pm |
|
|
| Laurel Soup wrote: |
| Unless you're constantly moving stuff around in your Program Files folder Vista isn't that bad at all. The UAC thing is just a slightly clunkier version of UNIX's sudo thing. |
Yeah this.
I was actually glad to see it. I don't have to log in as admin to make changes anymore.
My one complaint is it's sort of a resource hog. A machine with this processor and this much ram should not have trouble with frame accuracy when rendering video. Could be something else, though. LiVES and Cinelerra CV work well enough that I'm not likely to find out. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
manmachine plays jazz Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:39 pm |
|
|
| yeah i'm only opposed to vista because an OS shouldn't chew up as much memory as it does |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BIGJ420COOLDUDE

Joined: 04 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:01 pm |
|
|
| GalaxyHead wrote: |
| Quote: |
| There is no Service Pack 2 for Vista. |
I meant SP1. Whatever. It has some kind of pack.
I bought a Dell and I wager I will be spending most of my time uninstalling shit I don't want, but I don't really mind.
So I'll give vista a shot (still haven't set up the computer, too busy) what is a recommended list of things I should turn off for higher performance and where are they located? |
honestly you don't need to turn off anything for higher performance. it'll probably run better with aero than without. i mean MAYBE you could turn off drive indexing but w/e |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GalaxyHead

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Discrimination of male social status by female hamsters
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:12 am |
|
|
| Man these warnings are pretty annoying, but then I won't be installing programs left and right constantly. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Toptube Anti-cabbage Party Candidate
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:43 am |
|
|
Have a look at KM's post, and Touran's, too.
Unless you plan on being dedicated to downloading updates every 2 weeks or so, I'd recommend leaving Windows update on and just tell it to not install the updates until you tell it to (which can be done as you shutodwn your computer). MS releases updates and hotfixes for a reason. 90% of the time they are for your security and you should be installing them. Windows is the most widely used OS, so its the most targeted. But, If its all patched, it is also the most secure. another 5% are performance and reliability improvements and the remaining 5% are things you probably don't need. but autoupdate does an ok job of leaving most of that stuff out.
Apple and Linux security claims are based mostly on security through obscurity. If someone really wanted to, they could wreak some quick and widespread havoc on those Operating systems.
The complaints about the ram footprint are pretty skewed because the way Vista manages ram is so very different from how XP manages ram, you cannot compare them. After the intial footprint is made in your ram from the currently running processes and appications, it then caches your recently and most commonly used stuff in the ram still available, often greatly increases start up speeds and initial response times to your applications. Especially after a fresh reboot. There is also a snappy smoothness brought to everything that is not felt in XP. Its true that Vista has a higher minimum for ram requirements, but is that really a suprise for a new OS release? no, it is not. Also, ram is fucking cheap. There are $500 computers shipping with 4, 6, 8 gigs of ram. If you have at least 2 gigs of ram, you shouldn't experience any ram related problems with Vista. because with 2 gigs or more, it has enough to properly utilize its new features. So, the ram footprint seems large.
I use 2 gigs of ram on the 32 bit version of Home Premium and have never ever ever experienced any problems related to ram usage that I didn't experience in XP. Also, initially Vista is actually going to feel a little slower than it should because as you first start to use it, its constantly caching and re-adjusting to your usage habits. After you settle into your computer with your own everyday groove (after 2 weeks maybe?), Vista will figure it out and it will become smoother. Long term, Vista is much more enjoyable, stable, and smoother to use than XP ever was for me.
SP1 brought Vista up to the same level of gaming performance as XP, its actually often even a little better now, when compared apples to apples. It also fixed some peculiarites with data transfer, particularly large files, and it toned down the UAC. It fixed some other little niggles too, but those were the big things that I remember.
My only recommendations are to use an Anti-Virus that's less invasive than what likely shipped on your machine, and as with any version of windows, to set the pagefile to a constant size of about 3 or 4 gigs. Its default setting is dynamic size, so its constantly changing. I personally use Avast! home edition and cannot attribute any performance loss to it. I used it on XP, too. 2 other popular and comparable AV are NOD32 and AVG. All 3 of these should be free.
Home Premium is the only version anyone should pay attention to unless they need advanced networking options or want Media Center integration. Home Premium retail copies come with a license for the 64-bit version. You can get a disc from MS for $10 shipping. I will be installing it after I upgrade my computer soon, as I will move to 4 gigs of ram (32bit OS can't use more than about 3).
I've been using Vista Home Premium since day 2 of its release. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Lollerskater

Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:38 am |
|
|
I do believe that there are people out there who genuinely have bad luck with Vista. My former roommate must have tried installing Vista on about 7 machines, of which most were specifically designed with Vista in mind. However he could get none of them to run properly.
On the other hand I have so far enjoyed Vista on 3 different computers of which 1 laptop. And in all cases the experience has been more than enjoyable. Vista is still my main gaming OS.
Experiences with Vista really seem to be a hit or miss for everyone. But I'd say if you're good to go it's pretty much rock-solid. Oh and as mentioned keep Aero on if you can (e.g. you've got a pretty good graphics card). I haven't seen any noticeable performance differences between it being switched on or off and from what someone told me Aero should actually be GPU accelerated. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:22 pm |
|
|
By the by, there's a Windows 7 beta making the rounds, and all initial testimony points to it being Vista minus the bloat - and all Vista drivers work fine on it.
Also, there is a Vista Service Pack 2 coming down the pipeline very soon.
But really, there's no reason to uninstall Vista in favor of XP anymore. If you have one, stick with it. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BenoitRen I bought RAM

Joined: 05 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:02 pm |
|
|
| Toptube wrote: |
| Its true that Vista has a higher minimum for ram requirements, but is that really a suprise for a new OS release? no, it is not. |
Not a surprise, but an upgrade should use just as much, or less, RAM. It's supposed to be an improvement.
| Quote: |
| Also, ram is fucking cheap. |
That's a common excuse that encourages bloat.
| Quote: |
| I will be installing it after I upgrade my computer soon, as I will move to 4 gigs of ram (32bit OS can't use more than about 3). |
This is false. That's a BIOS limitation.
| Felix wrote: |
| By the by, there's a Windows 7 beta making the rounds, and all initial testimony points to it being Vista minus the bloat - and all Vista drivers work fine on it. |
The beta versions always seem more promising until the retail version hits. _________________ Get Xenoblade Chronicles!
| udoschuermann wrote: |
| Whenever I read things like "id like to by a new car," I cringe inside, imagine some grunting ape who happened across a keyboard, and move on without thinking about the attempted message. |
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
km

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Minor character in a frame story
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:12 pm |
|
|
| BenoitRen wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I will be installing it after I upgrade my computer soon, as I will move to 4 gigs of ram (32bit OS can't use more than about 3). |
This is false. That's a BIOS limitation. |
No, that's a limit of 32-bit pointers. _________________
vi) RPGs (Role-Playing Games)
For adolescents; half-formed personalities roaming (in packs) in search of identity. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
manmachine plays jazz Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:51 pm |
|
|
| Toptube wrote: |
Apple and Linux security claims are based mostly on security through obscurity. If someone really wanted to, they could wreak some quick and widespread havoc on those Operating systems. |
man all those *nix servers certainly disagree with you. and openBSD.
| Quote: |
The complaints about the ram footprint are pretty skewed because the way Vista manages ram is so very different from how XP manages ram, you cannot compare them. After the intial footprint is made in your ram from the currently running processes and appications, it then caches your recently and most commonly used stuff in the ram still available, often greatly increases start up speeds and initial response times to your applications. Especially after a fresh reboot. There is also a snappy smoothness brought to everything that is not felt in XP. Its true that Vista has a higher minimum for ram requirements, but is that really a suprise for a new OS release? no, it is not. Also, ram is fucking cheap. There are $500 computers shipping with 4, 6, 8 gigs of ram. If you have at least 2 gigs of ram, you shouldn't experience any ram related problems with Vista. because with 2 gigs or more, it has enough to properly utilize its new features. So, the ram footprint seems large.
I use 2 gigs of ram on the 32 bit version of Home Premium and have never ever ever experienced any problems related to ram usage that I didn't experience in XP. Also, initially Vista is actually going to feel a little slower than it should because as you first start to use it, its constantly caching and re-adjusting to your usage habits. After you settle into your computer with your own everyday groove (after 2 weeks maybe?), Vista will figure it out and it will become smoother. Long term, Vista is much more enjoyable, stable, and smoother to use than XP ever was for me. |
dude that's 2 gigs of ram that could be used to make call of duty 4 run better, seriously, an OS has no business taking up half of my memory.
| Quote: |
I've been using Vista Home Premium since day 2 of its release. |
early-adopter fanboy?
i'll admit aero is pretty nice to look at. os x is still prettier, though :( |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Panoptic

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:01 pm |
|
|
| Doesn't Vista release the memory used for "superfetch" when it's required elsewhere? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Predator Goose
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Location: Oversensitive Pedantic Ninny
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:08 pm |
|
|
| Toptube wrote: |
| Its true that Vista has a higher minimum for ram requirements, but is that really a suprise for a new OS release? no, it is not. |
I wish I lived in a world where this was a suprise. I like streamlined interfaces. _________________ I can no longer shop happily. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GalaxyHead

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Discrimination of male social status by female hamsters
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:04 pm |
|
|
| So how much ram does the home edition use? I only bought 3 gigs of ram. I haven't had time to do anything heavy duty yet to test it (Photoshop CS, Reason) but so far I see nothing lacking. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Toptube Anti-cabbage Party Candidate
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:24 pm |
|
|
| Panoptic wrote: |
| Doesn't Vista release the memory used for "superfetch" when it's required elsewhere? |
Yep. Call of Duty 4 doesn't run any worse on Vista than it does on XP. Might even run a bit better, as some games do show a small improvement under Vista when benchmarking. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Toptube Anti-cabbage Party Candidate
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:27 pm |
|
|
| GalaxyHead wrote: |
| So how much ram does the home edition use? I only bought 3 gigs of ram. I haven't had time to do anything heavy duty yet to test it (Photoshop CS, Reason) but so far I see nothing lacking. |
I've used 2 gigs of DDR-1 with a dual core socket 939 Athlon 64 (3 or 4 year old tech) since Day 2 and have never had problems related to ram capacity. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|