|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Corinth thatbox

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:03 am |
|
|
| Joe wrote: |
| Could someone lay out exactly what Vista is up to regarding DRM? I've heard a lot of stuff about how awful it is, but just as much about how it isn't that noticable. |
HDCP compliant graphics card and HDCP compliant monitor officially required for playback of such things as BD and HDDVD. Plus other shit from WMP, probably. If you just download everything anyway this shouldn't make much of a dent in your media consuming, unless you're the guy always downloads disc images. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
DaleNixon

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: dirty dirty south
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
km

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Minor character in a frame story
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:24 am |
|
|
So I've been using Vista Ultimate for about two hours now. (not ARRRed, by the by)
It is the most annoying goddamn operating system EVER. It constantly prompts you about EVERYTHING. When you change permissions to relax this, it just LIES to you and doesn't actually change anything. That or it just makes up its own rules entirely separate from the rules it tells you about.
Its using 380MB of RAM right now! I have Miranda and Firefox open. One tab open in FF. ONE.
It's also got my CPU clocked up to full tilt for some reason, so the fan is just running fucking constantly. And yes, I made sure to tell it to feel free to clock down the CPU if it didn't need it.
I do like things about it! It has a lot more options that make getting your computer set up well possible. I like the new file dialogs. I actually think the new Windows Explorer is pretty decent. It's pretty. The start menu is better, and the taskbar just seems better in general. I like the delineation between home and public networks.
But good lord, the OS acts like it knows a lot better than I do what I'd like to do with my files. They've also made a bad choice, in my opinion, of making a lot of things task-based, rather than just giving me options directly.
Also, system requirements are a little steep. 1GB of RAM. Why? 15GB of HDD, just for the OS. Why? (it seems to only use 6GB on my un-futzed with install, BTW) This version has whined a few times about me not having a good enough graphics card to run Aero, and keeps telling me to upgrade it, which is of course impossible on my year old laptop.
I think they could have done a lot worse, and it's not AS bad as people have been acting like it is, but I am definitely going back to my dual boot XP/Gentoo, at least until they release Vista: Not So Fucking Annoying Edition.
I might install it on my desktop too, to see if Aero is worth a damn! _________________
vi) RPGs (Role-Playing Games)
For adolescents; half-formed personalities roaming (in packs) in search of identity. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
ecchi
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Location: LA & SF
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:09 am |
|
|
| km wrote: |
| Its using 380MB of RAM right now! I have Miranda and Firefox open. One tab open in FF. ONE. |
This is because of a new technology called Superfetch or something. It uses free memory to store stuff that you're likely to use later on. If an application/game/whatever needs that memory, Windows will let that process have it. Vista is actually better at memory management than any previous version of Windows.
| Quote: |
| It's also got my CPU clocked up to full tilt for some reason, so the fan is just running fucking constantly. And yes, I made sure to tell it to feel free to clock down the CPU if it didn't need it. |
This is probably a motherboard/chipset/video card driver issue. Video card because depending on your setup it might actually be your GPU fans going crazy.
I've been running Business for a few days and have been pretty happy with it. It's XP, but better. Runs just as well, too. I haven't had any annoying issues with UAC, but I'm running under a privileged account so that might be why. I mean, it asks me for permission for installers and stuff, but I'm okay with that. I did disable the screen-dimming effect though. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
km

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Minor character in a frame story
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:31 am |
|
|
No GPU to speak of: Intel 855GM graphics.
Also, from what I can understand from the performance viewer, Vista is actually using all my RAM, and just has the total amount - cached listed as used. That is, under "Physical Memory" it lists this:
Total 479
Cached 139
Free 9
below where it says I have 79%/380MB physical memory used. That seems to indicate to me that the caching stuff (which I knew about, and all modern OSes take advantage of, including XP) isn't included when giving used memory. It wouldn't make sense to include it in that value anyway, since I'm positive the memory with cache on it is only treated with slightly higher regard than totally free memory, as it's literally just there for lack of something better. All that leads me to believe that vista is legitimately using all the 380MB its talking about, or they fucked up their performance monitor really really badly. _________________
vi) RPGs (Role-Playing Games)
For adolescents; half-formed personalities roaming (in packs) in search of identity. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Panoptic

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:34 am |
|
|
| km wrote: |
| It constantly prompts you about EVERYTHING. When you change permissions to relax this, it just LIES to you and doesn't actually change anything. |
Open up your Control Panel and click on "Check this computer's security status." When the Windows Security Center comes up, under "Other Security Settings," there's a field called "User Account Control." Turn that off and reboot, and it shouldn't prompt to make changes anymore.
| Quote: |
| Its using 380MB of RAM right now! I have Miranda and Firefox open. One tab open in FF. ONE. |
Yeah, Vista actually uses RAM instead of just shoving stuff in a page file - go figure. Once I'm done booting, I'm using about 500MB of memory, and I've seen it get up to 1300ish. Isn't something you should have to worry about.
| Quote: |
| It's also got my CPU clocked up to full tilt for some reason, so the fan is just running fucking constantly. And yes, I made sure to tell it to feel free to clock down the CPU if it didn't need it. |
Hmm. It sounds like you've already changed the power profile, but just in case, Control Panel / Hardware and Sound / Power Options. Haven't messed with it on a notebook yet, myself, so I can't say for sure if that'll fix your problem.
Last edited by Panoptic on Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:39 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Mechanical ontological terrorist

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Scare Room 99
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:36 am |
|
|
| Mr. Mechanical wrote: |
| You have to keep us updated on the new minesweeper. |
Guys, I was being kind of serious about this. _________________
| internisus wrote: |
| You are a pretty fucked up guy. |
True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Panoptic

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:42 am |
|
|
| Mr. Mechanical wrote: |
| Mr. Mechanical wrote: |
| You have to keep us updated on the new minesweeper. |
Guys, I was being kind of serious about this. |
Uh. It's shiny and the sound effects are neat for the first few rounds?
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Duckzero

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Microsoft Land
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:39 am |
|
|
I have guys who work on the Windows team that tell me not to use Vista. It's not just a few of them, but like 70% of them. Seriously. _________________ Keepin' it real like Oatmeal |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Triton

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:39 am |
|
|
Ok so I got windows 2000 because it was the first OS microsoft made with a proper stable kernel, and I still run it. I never bought XP, and I didn't miss out on a single thing. Why should I buy this operating system?
A shiny taskbar, new icons, and a few tech features that I will probably never use is worth $300? Sometimes I think people buy the new windows just because of some sort of weird sense of obligation. I see the advertisements say Vista is "Entertaining". I don't need my operating system to entertain me, i need it to operate my system. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Lestrade Mary McMoePanties

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:46 am |
|
|
I hope Vista causes Apple to include something everyone has wanted in OSX from day one: themes. I like how Vista has that simple theme switcher. Want a pinkish interface? Blue? Red?
Functionally speaking, OSX is spot on, and gets better with every update. But sometimes I get bored of Stormtrooper White, you know? _________________ Illustration Portfolio | The Gamer's Quarter |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
IIOIOOIOO double banned
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:59 pm |
|
|
| Legal Step wrote: |
| Drem wrote: |
| Broco wrote: |
| Legal Step wrote: |
| This doesn't bode well for Longhorn, the other super secret OS |
Is this some kind of subtle joke or something? Longhorn was just the codename of Vista before its name was officially decided, much like say Nintendo Revolution. |
I think he's probably thinking of Vienna/Blackcomb.
|
Yes I got my awesome Microsoft code names confused. That is the next OS right? |
You guys are all losers. Vista is not Longhorn but does have some of the FS components built for Longhorn. Longhorn is the next generation server OS (following Windows Server 2003) and will go RTM... sometime in Q4? It's beta-able right now. It's got some super-cool stuff like windowed RDP sessions. You can get Citrix Server type user-experience without shelling out for bitchhigh Citrix licenses! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
les meat

Joined: 17 Dec 2006 Location: The sea
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:51 pm |
|
|
Thank god Microsoft have finally joined the 20th century and offloaded desktop compositing to the GPU, for the past 4 years its been agony using windows instead of osx because I would really notice all that shitty redrawing when you dragged windows and closed things. So thats excellent, if a little too late.
However
So sad to still see windows 95/98 icons and windows 2000 icons cropping up in the odd window.
For god sake learn some consistency, you should have chucked every single icon resource out and redone the lot with this version.
http://screenshots.haque.net/screenshots/view/32704/screenshot-32704.png
this bugs me on the vista machine at work, why the hell are the corners of the notifications aliased, you went to the trouble of making it transparent but then you didn't smooth out the corners.
Looks like garbage
Also the shadows on the desktop text are way too square and chubby, no idea whats going wrong with the text drop shadow system but I've never seen a shadow that looks so wrong before.
Could list hundreds of other small things but I wont
Might seem like little things to some people, but when your job requires that you scrutinise your work like this then you can't help but notice these things and they bug the hell out of you. And when I see things like this then I know that the interface designers are not paying close enough attention to their work.
| Quote: |
I hope Vista causes Apple to include something everyone has wanted in OSX from day one: themes. I like how Vista has that simple theme switcher. Want a pinkish interface? Blue? Red? |
Apple will never let you change Aqua dramatically, I think they follow the theory of that allowing a theme is admitting your solution is not as good as it should be. Which I can understand considering the amount of work they put into interface design an usability.
Although I think at some point in the future they will let us hue-shift the blue/graphite components, because it would need to be done in real time so applications throughout the system that use custom graphics can do it too.
Or you could just install Shapeshifter :) _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
psiga saudade

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 4:35 pm |
|
|
| les meat wrote: |
| Also the shadows on the desktop text are way too square and chubby, no idea whats going wrong with the text drop shadow system but I've never seen a shadow that looks so wrong before. |
Microsoft doesn't do shadows very well, no. http://www.webthang.co.uk/Tuts/tuts_css/css3/css3.asp (requires IE in order to fully "appreciate" the effect) _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:06 pm |
|
|
| IIOIOOIOO wrote: |
| You guys are all losers. Vista is not Longhorn but does have some of the FS components built for Longhorn. Longhorn is the next generation server OS (following Windows Server 2003) and will go RTM... sometime in Q4? It's beta-able right now. It's got some super-cool stuff like windowed RDP sessions. You can get Citrix Server type user-experience without shelling out for bitchhigh Citrix licenses! |
Yes, Vista is Longhorn. Longhorn workstation was given the release name Vista, but Longhorn server is still called Longhorn because MS prefers to name their server OSes by year and it's not clear whether it will be released in 2007 or 2008. It's not our fault if Microsoft's naming schemes are really confusing. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Lestrade Mary McMoePanties

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:53 pm |
|
|
| les meat wrote: |
| Quote: |
I hope Vista causes Apple to include something everyone has wanted in OSX from day one: themes. I like how Vista has that simple theme switcher. Want a pinkish interface? Blue? Red? |
Apple will never let you change Aqua dramatically, I think they follow the theory of that allowing a theme is admitting your solution is not as good as it should be. Which I can understand considering the amount of work they put into interface design an usability.
Although I think at some point in the future they will let us hue-shift the blue/graphite components, because it would need to be done in real time so applications throughout the system that use custom graphics can do it too.
Or you could just install Shapeshifter :) |
Yeah, I thought so. I used to run ShapeShifter, but was worried when I had some dock issues. I really like being able to change themes on a whim, so I'll give it another shot.
I really want Apple to provide hue-shifting; even OS 9 supported this! With Leopard, everything (well, almost everything) is going to be resolution-independent, so I would hope some simply colour changes would be natively available. _________________ Illustration Portfolio | The Gamer's Quarter |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:15 pm |
|
|
| Yeah, speaking of resolution independence, I think this will be the killer feature of Vista in the long run. When we all have 4000x3000 native resolution 14-inch screens, today's pixel-based interfaces will fail completely. I am disappointed that it doesn't seem to be used prominently right now, though. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
sawtooth heh

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: flashback
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:30 pm |
|
|
Shapeshifter runs through APE, which is the framework unsanity created to make their system hacks. If you go to the system preferences and the APE control panel, just add the Dock to the "master exclude list" and theoretically nothing using that framework should mess with your Dock. _________________ ( ( |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
ecchi
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Location: LA & SF
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:47 pm |
|
|
| Quote: |
| All that leads me to believe that vista is legitimately using all the 380MB its talking about, or they fucked up their performance monitor really really badly. |
Yeah, I realize now that what I said wasn't the case (but Superfetch really is better than anything I've ever seen in other operating systems). I think Panoptic is right. All I know is that my computer is running better than in XP, and this is from an upgrade install so it's not the fresh reformat effect. When I click a taskbar icon the program comes up immediately, even Visual Studio -- that really wasn't the case in XP. And I only have 1gb of RAM.
| Quote: |
| Ok so I got windows 2000 because it was the first OS microsoft made with a proper stable kernel, and I still run it. I never bought XP, and I didn't miss out on a single thing. Why should I buy this operating system? |
Well, you didn't really miss out on anything major, but XP is nicer than 2k. You know -- hiding system tray icons, better out-of-the-box driver support, skinnable UI. I wouldn't have paid for XP from 2k, but I (and a lot of people) got it for free at least once. I have something like four legal licenses, two of them for XP Pro.
Vista is sort of like that, but moreso. Like I said earlier, my decently-fast computer (low-end Core Duo, a gig of ram and a crappy ATI mobility card) runs faster in Vista. The Upgrade install was flawless, and everything aside from my graphics card and some Thinkpad-specific drivers worked immediately. So already my end-user experience is pretty much identical to that of XP, but faster.
Now there are the parts where Vista is better: GPU-accelerated GUI is great for a few reasons. The wireless network handing is a lot nicer. The system tray customization is a lot better -- the 'system' items like volume, power, networking and clock have their own little section and can be toggled. The rest operate similar to in XP, but the OS is a lot better at tracking items so stuff marked as hidden stays hidden. The new Start menu is neat, though I've never been a huge fan of Google Desktop/Quicksilver/whatever so I don't use it much.
So far the only thing that's actually pissed me off is that 'Sleep' takes longer than 'Standby' used to because it stores its current state to disk before powering down. This means that I can't just close my laptop at the end of class and throw it into my backpack. The wait's usually only 30 seconds or so, but I don't like it.
I got it for free, and I'm glad I did. It hasn't changed the way I use my computer, but it's made my life nicer. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BotageL pretty anime princess

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: *fidget*
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:34 am |
|
|
| ecchi wrote: |
| So far the only thing that's actually pissed me off is that 'Sleep' takes longer than 'Standby' used to because it stores its current state to disk before powering down. This means that I can't just close my laptop at the end of class and throw it into my backpack. The wait's usually only 30 seconds or so, but I don't like it. |
This is rather interesting/confusing. They're replaced Standby/Sleep entirely with what used to be called Hibernate? I just can't see a reason why they would do this. _________________
http://www.mdgeist.com/ |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:09 am |
|
|
| BotageL wrote: |
| ecchi wrote: |
| So far the only thing that's actually pissed me off is that 'Sleep' takes longer than 'Standby' used to because it stores its current state to disk before powering down. This means that I can't just close my laptop at the end of class and throw it into my backpack. The wait's usually only 30 seconds or so, but I don't like it. |
This is rather interesting/confusing. They're replaced Standby/Sleep entirely with what used to be called Hibernate? I just can't see a reason why they would do this. |
I've seen more than one complaint (e.g. this) about the shutdown menu in Vista, it seems they screwed it up somewhat. Though I didn't toy with it enough to understand what the new options were.
Anyway, the option for old-style sleep is certainly around somewhere, if only by tweaking some registry key. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
ecchi
Joined: 07 Dec 2006 Location: LA & SF
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:28 am |
|
|
| BotageL wrote: |
| ecchi wrote: |
| So far the only thing that's actually pissed me off is that 'Sleep' takes longer than 'Standby' used to because it stores its current state to disk before powering down. This means that I can't just close my laptop at the end of class and throw it into my backpack. The wait's usually only 30 seconds or so, but I don't like it. |
This is rather interesting/confusing. They're replaced Standby/Sleep entirely with what used to be called Hibernate? I just can't see a reason why they would do this. |
Not exactly. Hibernate is still there. Standby is replaced with Sleep, which has the quick recovery time of Standby but the data reliability of Hibernation -- so if your laptop runs out of battery while sleeping, you can wake it up as if out of hibernation. Or so I hear. I can understand the reasoning, but I prefer the old way. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
gooktime

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: no
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:55 am |
|
|
Still using the Windows 3.1 font installation dialogue and icons. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BotageL pretty anime princess

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: *fidget*
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 3:14 am |
|
|
| ecchi wrote: |
| Not exactly. Hibernate is still there. Standby is replaced with Sleep, which has the quick recovery time of Standby but the data reliability of Hibernation -- so if your laptop runs out of battery while sleeping, you can wake it up as if out of hibernation. Or so I hear. I can understand the reasoning, but I prefer the old way. |
In XP, I just set my laptop to sleep when I closed the lid, and auto-hibernate after 15 minutes or so. It seems to me like this is the ideal way to do it - you have the temporary, still-in-memory-but-low-power pause for short interruptions, which automatically switches to the long-term interruption mode after a short period of time. I don't see why MS would really want to mess with this function.
| gooktime wrote: |
| Still using the Windows 3.1 font installation dialogue and icons. |
Wait, you use a DIALOG BOX to do this? Hell, I always just opened the Font control panel in XP and chucked the .ttf file into it. I didn't realize there even was another way to do it.
By the way, Vista kids, does the system still default to automatically downloading available updates for everything it can and automatically installing a gross of them when you press "shut down" because you didn't notice that the button had been subtly replaced with a "shut down after spending fifteen minutes installing updates" button? That really pissed me off when XP pulled that stunt on my laptop last week; I think it's a terrible default setting. _________________
http://www.mdgeist.com/ |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
psiga saudade

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 3:24 am |
|
|
I install fonts the old hardcore manual way, of dragging and dropping them into the C:\windows\fonts\ folder. Force of habit.
Man, the third party Compaq power management tool on my laptop doesn't even give me the option of Sleep. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Mechanical ontological terrorist

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Scare Room 99
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:31 am |
|
|
| Panoptic wrote: |
| Uh. It's shiny and the sound effects are neat for the first few rounds? |
Thank you! _________________
| internisus wrote: |
| You are a pretty fucked up guy. |
True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:59 am |
|
|
hey guys
ive been using windows vista for about two months now and
oh no wait this is mac OSX
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH SNAP _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
gooktime

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: no
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:07 am |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Wait, you use a DIALOG BOX to do this? Hell, I always just opened the Font control panel in XP and chucked the .ttf file into it. I didn't realize there even was another way to do it. |
I use OSX, I just double click them. I'm just remarking how amateurish and inconsistent it is to have three generations of icon in one screenshot. What, 6 years of development and Windows 3.1 and 95 icons are still popping up all over the place? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Lestrade Mary McMoePanties

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:59 pm |
|
|
| 108 wrote: |
hey guys
ive been using windows vista for about two months now and
oh no wait this is mac OSX
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH SNAP |
More like Windows (Fucked Yo') Sista, amirite? _________________ Illustration Portfolio | The Gamer's Quarter |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Rucio
Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: oh HIGH oh
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:35 pm |
|
|
Hey guys I heard Directx 10 was only coming out for Vista. I don't get it. Does that mean I'll have to get Vista eventually anyways if I plan to continue playing PC games? _________________ "Say, that's a nice fez!"
"Thank you very much. Why do you like it?"
"It's better than a sharp stick in the eye." |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BotageL pretty anime princess

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: *fidget*
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GcDiaz

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Clinton, MA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:00 pm |
|
|
So for the longest time I've been running an ARRRed copy of XP Pro (the only legit XP I ever used came with my laptop back in '02). In trying to score MCE2005 (for 360 connectivity) I get downright frustrated with MS' security measures. As if. So I cave and order an original copy of MCE. Then I see they have Vista home premium for only $10 more.
It arrives tomorrow. I've already downloaded the Vista drivers for my video and sound cards, so they'll be ready to go. Although according to the little "vista system checker" thing, I can't use Nero 6? How am I supposed to backup my data? _________________ Steam/PSN/Xbawks: GcDiaz
Let's bring sexy back!
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Rucio
Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: oh HIGH oh
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:26 pm |
|
|
thanks _________________ "Say, that's a nice fez!"
"Thank you very much. Why do you like it?"
"It's better than a sharp stick in the eye." |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:41 pm |
|
|
| GcDiaz wrote: |
| Although according to the little "vista system checker" thing, I can't use Nero 6? How am I supposed to backup my data? |
Yeah old versions of Nero are completely broken in Vista. You will have to buy/"buy" Nero 7 (their website says recent versions of it are Vista compatible). |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GcDiaz

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Clinton, MA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:04 am |
|
|
Fucking UPS. I track my package and see it's out for delivery as of 8:36AM today. Fine. 10-ish, I'm walking to my car to go somewhere when I see a UPS truck approaching. So I stand there and wait for it to stop. It does, at the next house over. Driver delivers a package, and moves on. All day I've been wondering if they just forgot to put mine in the truck, or if the driver's fiending for my Vista, or what. Then finally at 6p I see that it's been delivered (I'm at work, thankfully only a mile from home). Problem is, who the fuck did they deliver it to? I live alone. Well, they didn't actually deliver it to anyone. They just left it leaning against my door (just as my videocard was left there some time ago; it was of course stolen). See, if they'd taken it back and left me a note, it would be OK. Get up early, drive the 30 mins to the dist. center, get my shit. Instead, I have to take the chance that when I get home from work in 4.5 hours, the box will still be there. Hell with that. I drove home, picked the box up off the floor and drove back. I'll probably just do the install tonight, then all the piddling stuff tomorrow. _________________ Steam/PSN/Xbawks: GcDiaz
Let's bring sexy back!
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BenoitRen I bought RAM

Joined: 05 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:05 am |
|
|
I've been away for a couple days, so here's a couple response posts. This one is for Broco:
| Quote: |
| This childish rant barely deserves to be dignified with a response, but anyway... |
Childish? Probably only because you disagree with me/are a Vista fanboy.
| Quote: |
| What? No. Bog-standard el cheapo integrated motherboard video cards will do. All this GPU power has been around for years and you're complaining that an OS gets around to using it? |
Of course! An OS is just a tool, not some light show! Why should it look super-pretty which in turn consumes more resources? Those resources should be used to make the programs run efficiently.
I also doubt that there was that much GPU power to start with in computers of regular home users, who are not gamers. You'll find 32 MB video cards in them.
| Quote: |
| Also, Vista's UI is just fine (and still better than XP's) if you turn Aero off. |
See, this is a common excuse. You can turn it off. What happened to sensible defaults that didn't assume your PC was loaded with the latest technological advancements, or that you needed all that stuff?
| Quote: |
| Attacking Windows for bloat is silly. All those new features have to go somewhere, and I'm not seeing Mac OS X or desktop Linux distributions doing it much more efficiently. |
Who says there have to be newer features in the first place? Do home users need all of them? Again, it's supposed to be an OS, not a jack-of-all-trades program, programmed to be efficient instead of sucking up as much RAM and HDD space as possible. Can you really justify 2 GB RAM and 15 GB of space just for an OS?
I can't speak for Mac OS X, but with Linux it all depends on your window manager. There are ones that have a lot of eye candy, others are conservative.
| Quote: |
| And keeping around old APIs is still less resource-intensive than running your old software in an emulation layer like you have to do with Macs, or recompiling it like you have to do with Linux. |
I'm not talking about old APIs. That I'm fine with, and understand the need for. It's all those silly features like integrating the browser into the explorer, browsing your hard drive like a web page, viewing thumb nails of pictures in the explorer, the Fax and Image Viewer, the sheduler, etc.
| Quote: |
| For example, XP and Vista boot hella fast |
In less than 30 seconds? Even after using it for months? Because I have a WinXP laptop here at home that takes more than a minute before it's ready. Defragging doesn't help anymore. Vista, like XP, isn't really done loading when the desktop appears. It's still loading all the bazillion services, and Vista loads your most used applications thanks to SuperFetch.
For reference, Win9x systems could already boot in less than 30 seconds. On older hardware!
| Quote: |
| Turn it off then. But you'd be an idiot and you know it. |
Again the turn it off argument!
No, I wouldn't be an idiot, because I'm not a luser who clicks "Yes" on every prompt and throws every program at my system without a second thought, while using an insecure browser.
common_sense.exe is still the best tool against malware.
| Quote: |
| Use the classic look then, what?, ack this is because of the vast improvement in architecture did you prefer the instability and general crappiness of Win9x?, and addressed above. |
Win9x is not crappy, it's still a decent home OS. It's actually very stable if you have good drivers, especially Win95 because it didn't have IE integrated. See, drivers run at the same level as the kernel, so when one fails, it's BSOD. Because drivers are a big problem every time a Windows version comes out, this has become a running joke.
Yes, the kernel got better in NT5, but they fucked up the rest. _________________ Get Xenoblade Chronicles!
| udoschuermann wrote: |
| Whenever I read things like "id like to by a new car," I cringe inside, imagine some grunting ape who happened across a keyboard, and move on without thinking about the attempted message. |
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:12 am |
|
|
| BenoitRen wrote: |
| See, drivers run at the same level as the kernel, so when one fails, it's BSOD. Because drivers are a big problem every time a Windows version comes out, this has become a running joke. |
Speaking of which, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User-Mode_Driver_Framework . |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BenoitRen I bought RAM

Joined: 05 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:42 am |
|
|
@Craptastic!
| Quote: |
| You can turn off the Aero interface. |
Turn off argument again!
| Quote: |
| Not only that, but considering the whole 3d desktop feature and such, wouldn't it make sense to require at the very least, a $50 "3d gaming" videocard to pull it off? |
Why does it make sense to have a 3D desktop in the first place? And why should I buy hardware for my OS instead of buying it for my programs! I get a computer to run my own programs, not an OS!
| Quote: |
| 15 whole Gigabytes? Oh my god! Our 200+ gb HDDs can't sustain that! |
Just because our hard drives get bigger is no reason to bloat your OS to take even more space.
| Quote: |
| Considering that it's possible to get viruses onto a fresh install of XP with SP2 without even opening up an application nowadays, could you elaborate on what exactly it is that you don't consider potentially harmful? |
It prompts you on every program. It prompts you when you change the start page of your browser (might have changed since the beta). It prompts you when you want to change your Start menu. etc.
| Quote: |
| So...who's fault is that? That's right, the folks behind the incompatible hardware who've had a year or so to come up with new drivers. |
The drivers are their fault, yes, but the incompatibility is Microsoft's doing.
| Lestrade wrote: |
| I like how Vista has that simple theme switcher. Want a pinkish interface? Blue? Red? |
Um, already possible in every Windows release ever since 3.1 or 95?
By the way, Windows Vista is the next puzzle in achieving TCPA. _________________ Get Xenoblade Chronicles!
| udoschuermann wrote: |
| Whenever I read things like "id like to by a new car," I cringe inside, imagine some grunting ape who happened across a keyboard, and move on without thinking about the attempted message. |
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
sawtooth heh

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: flashback
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:05 am |
|
|
| Lestrade wrote: |
| 108 wrote: |
hey guys
ive been using windows vista for about two months now and
oh no wait this is mac OSX
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH SNAP |
More like Windows (Fucked Yo') Sista, amirite? |
hey, are you giving shapeshifter another try? I'm using a trial right now, and a combination of cepophan's good grey theme and unsanity's shadowkiller brings me ever closer to the clean, spare, color-neutral os that I always wished os x would be. _________________ ( ( |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:19 am |
|
|
hey i want to play baldur's gate ii and doujin games and shit
so i want windows xp to install on my macbook pro and i don't feel like paying a lot
is there anyone out there who can get me like a $5 student discount version?
i'm not going to install pirated windows on my pristine computer. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GcDiaz

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Clinton, MA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:03 pm |
|
|
The deed is done. Installation was simple, and quick (no, seriously; 30 minutes and I was on the desktop). I've never been a windows power user, so it'll take a while to suss out all the improvements, but the obvious stuff is impressive:
That video was running, and didn't hitch or stutter no matter how quickly I rotated the pages. Also was installing my router at the time.
Initially I thought I was fucked since my motherboard CD doesn't work with Vista. However, Vista itself somehow provides the necessary LAN drivers so I could still connect. Asus will eventually pull their head out of their ass and put some drivers out there. Videocard installed with no problem, and even my SB Audigy beta driver did the job. Trillian3.1, Photoshop 7.0, they both work perfectly. I'll miss Nero, but something will come along. _________________ Steam/PSN/Xbawks: GcDiaz
Let's bring sexy back!
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|