selectbutton
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile / Ignoring   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Current Events Thread
Goto page
// Prev  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    selectbutton Forum Index -> GBF 120%
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:25 am        Reply with quote

It's like they're not even trying to hide the corruption. Well, they sort of are I suppose since the link does say that it's not obvious which member(s) of the Arizona House was responsible for swapping the bills.

One of these motherfuckers.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:05 am        Reply with quote

BEIRUT, Lebanon — The Syrian Army stormed the restive city of Dara’a with tanks and soldiers and helped detain dozens in towns across the country Monday in an escalation of the widening crackdown on Syria’s five-week-old uprising, according to residents and human rights activists. They said at least 25 people were killed in Dara’a, with reports of bodies strewn in the streets.

The military’s move into the town seemed to signal a new, harrowing chapter in a crackdown that has already killed nearly 400 people. So far hewing to a mix of concessions and brute force, the government’s actions Monday indicated that it had chosen the latter, seeking to crush a wave of dissent in virtually every province that has shaken the once-uncontested rule of President Bashar al-Assad.

“The government has decided to choose the path of violence and repression,” said a Syrian analyst in Beirut, who asked to remain anonymous for his safety. “How far can they go in this repression? That is the question.”

_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:55 am        Reply with quote

The Troops wrote:
http://www.latimes.com/business/sc-dc-0428-court-class-action-web-20110427,0,1239412.story

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court gave corporations a major win Wednesday, ruling in a 5-4 decision that companies can block their disgruntled customers from joining together in a class-action lawsuit. The ruling arose from a California lawsuit involving cellphones, but it will have a nationwide impact.

Brought to you by Supreme Court, Inc.


I knew this was going to happen I was just hoping it wouldn't happen so soon. There goes the public's last recourse at holding large companies accountable. America is going to have a hell of a time un-fucking itself when it finally manages to wise up to what's been happening the last few decades.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:10 am        Reply with quote

Hey thanks psiga. I will probably check that out at some point. Maybe even tonight after I finish this term paper.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:31 am        Reply with quote

SETI Institute to shut down alien-seeking radio dishes

And some commentary:

The Last Psychiatrist wrote:
SETI program has been closed down. The odds were against it ever making contact. But that wasn’t the point.

SETI had already become a privately funded project. Like rocketry, corporations and private citizens were/are taking on the lead.

In some ways this is a good thing, and it’s more than likely that SETI will find another private donor. But as the government pulls out of such projects, it reinforces itself as an organization of the present, committed to the immediate.

In order for this nation to be viable in the future, it must explicitly articulate its role to future generations. Even corporations have mission statements. Humans need an existential answer, and while previously religion served this purpose, nations, too, can offer this in the form of a grand narrative.

But as shown with SETI, “the future” is relegated to private industry, and “the present” to the government. Ultimately, this reinforces the government as a tool of industry, and institutionalizes the culture of short term benefit, of myopia and narcissism. Furthermore, there’s already a pervasive distrust of government and the current narratives, with more than idle speculation that the government is operating at cross purposes with its citizenry.

At a cost of $2.5M a year, SETI should have been maintained, even expanded, if only so that we can point to it and say, “well, it’s all a lot bigger than us."


Dan Dravot has an excellent response in the comments section as well.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:58 am        Reply with quote

Yes! I've been waiting for something like that to happen. I'm glad to see it's starting to take off.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:06 am        Reply with quote

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/osama-bin-laden-killed/story?id=13505703

Yep looks like it is for real. It'll be some nice closure for 9/11 for a lot of people. The wars will continue though.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:10 am        Reply with quote

Also Obama is going to speak soon.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:20 am        Reply with quote

Takashi wrote:
USA loves some sweet, cold revenge.


Yeah, given the number of Christians that live here one would think we'd be more about forgiveness and loving thy enemy than the old eye for an eye.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:48 am        Reply with quote

Yeah I know. I wish there was like a sarcasm tag for the internet because I wasn't actually being serious there.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:04 am        Reply with quote

Haha run to Canada. You guys just have no vision.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 11:50 pm        Reply with quote

NASA Announces Results of Epic Space-Time Experiment

May 4, 2011: Einstein was right again. There is a space-time vortex around Earth, and its shape precisely matches the predictions of Einstein's theory of gravity.

Researchers confirmed these points at a press conference today at NASA headquarters where they announced the long-awaited results of Gravity Probe B (GP-B).

"The space-time around Earth appears to be distorted just as general relativity predicts," says Stanford University physicist Francis Everitt, principal investigator of the Gravity Probe B mission.

"This is an epic result," adds Clifford Will of Washington University in St. Louis. An expert in Einstein's theories, Will chairs an independent panel of the National Research Council set up by NASA in 1998 to monitor and review the results of Gravity Probe B. "One day," he predicts, "this will be written up in textbooks as one of the classic experiments in the history of physics."

_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2011 2:10 am        Reply with quote

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/05/07/awlaki/index.html

Quote:
Yesterday, riding a wave of adulation and military-reverence, the Obama administration tried to end the life of this American citizen -- never charged with, let alone convicted of, any crime -- with a drone strike in Yemen, but missed and killed two other people instead:

A missile strike from an American military drone in a remote region of Yemen on Thursday was aimed at killing Anwar al-Awlaki, the radical American-born cleric believed to be hiding in the country, American officials said Friday.

The attack does not appear to have killed Mr. Awlaki, the officials said, but may have killed operatives of Al Qaeda's affiliate in Yemen.

The other people killed "may have" been Al Qaeda operatives. Or they "may not have" been. Who cares? They're mere collateral damage on the glorious road to ending the life of this American citizen without due process (and pointing out that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution expressly guarantees that "no person shall be deprived of life without due process of law" -- and provides no exception for war -- is the sort of tedious legalism that shouldn't interfere with the excitement of drone strikes).

There are certain civil liberties debates where, even though I hold strong opinions, I can at least understand the reasoning and impulses of those who disagree; the killing of bin Laden was one such instance. But the notion that the President has the power to order American citizens assassinated without an iota of due process -- far from any battlefield, not during combat -- is an idea so utterly foreign to me, so far beyond the bounds of what is reasonable, that it's hard to convey in words or treat with civility.


Quote:
The killing of bin Laden got the testosterone pumping, the righteousness pulsating, and faith in the American military and its Commander-in-Chief skyrocketing to all-time highs. It made America feel good about itself in a way that no other event has since at least Obama's inauguration; we got to forget about rampant unemployment, home foreclosures by the millions, a decade's worth of militaristic futility and slaughter, and ever-growing Third-World levels of wealth inequality. This was a week for flag-waving, fist-pumping, and nationalistic chanting: even -- especially -- among liberals, who were able to take the lead and show the world (and themselves) that they are no wilting, delicate wimps; it's not merely swaggering right-wing Texans, but they, too, who can put bullets in people's heads and dump corpses into the ocean and then joke and cheer about it afterwards. It's inconceivable that this wave of collective pride, boosted self-esteem, vicarious strength, and renewed purpose won't produce a desire to replicate itself. Four days after bin Laden is killed, a missile rains down from the sky to try to execute Awlaki without due process, and that'll be far from the last such episode (indeed, also yesterday, the U.S. launched a drone attack in Pakistan, ending the lives of 15 more people: yawn).


http://www.chris-floyd.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/2125-day-of-the-dead-the-hit-man-as-hero-.html
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2011 4:47 am        Reply with quote

Recently-released WikiLeaks documents show that detained al Qaeda members have predicted nuclear reprisals if Osama bin Laden were captured or killed.

Quote:
Abu al-Libi, al Qaeda's third in command and "operational chief" before he was captured in 2005, reportedly said the nuclear device was "located in Europe" and would be used in retaliation over bin Laden's death, according to the leaked files. The phrase "nuclear hellstorm" appears in the Defense Department's dossier on Khalid Shaykh Muhammad, who allegedly confessed to masterminding the September 11 attacks and will be tried by a military tribunal.

Another detainee, Sharif al-Masri, reportedly said that if al Qaeda was able to move the bomb to the United States, they would be able to find operatives of Europeans of Arab or Asian descent to use it. He said, the records show, if bin Laden "were to be captured or killed, the bomb would be detonated in the US" and that al-Libi "would be one of those able to give the order."


WikiLeaks: Osama bin Laden 'protected' by Pakistani security
Pakistani security forces allegedly helped Osama bin Laden evade American troops for almost 10 years, according to secret US government files.

_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 7:08 am        Reply with quote

Well you could argue that it is in the constitution. Right there at the beginning, even.

The US Constitution wrote:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


Keeping decent healthcare unaffordable for a large percentage of the population does not strike me as a very good way of promoting the general welfare but what do I know.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 7:29 am        Reply with quote

I don't know! I'm not exactly a constitutional scholar myself. But if the overall purpose of the document is to promote the general welfare, among other things, then you shouldn't really need a specific amendment telling you exactly how to do it. Part of the great thing about the constitution is that it's vague enough to be read and interpreted in different ways.

But I think arguing against healthcare from a constitutional standpoint is a bit disingenuous. There are a lot of things that aren't "in the constitution" that we act as though they were: http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 11:40 am        Reply with quote

So is Fukushima still spitting radiation into the atmosphere or what? I'm not surprised that it's in meltdown since that seems like a thing you would expect a reactor to do after getting hit with a giant earthquake. Interesting that they were able to go this long without declaring it though. It seemed like they had something of a handle on the situation so what changed? Was that all just really good pr and their grasp on the situation has only ever been tenuous at best? And the weeks of leaking radioactive water into the ocean doesn't sound very good either! I'm wondering if maybe by this point they shouldn't just start dumping millions of tons of concrete onto the thing and just call it a wash.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 1:14 pm        Reply with quote

So I guess the big worry now is the radiated sea water no one noticed for however many weeks then? I still say just bury the whole thing in concrete.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:35 pm        Reply with quote

psiga wrote:
I'm not aware of any systematic measurements of the surrounding water. ^_^


Yeah I haven't actually been following this beyond what people have been posting in this thread >_>
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 5:50 am        Reply with quote

Well, only the half facing the sun though right?
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 5:57 am        Reply with quote

That's interesting. So is it conceivable that certain spots of the planet could just luck out and not get affected by it? How things could change overnight if, say, most of the west coast of the US and some spots in India and Eastern Europe all managed to keep the lights on while everyone else went dark.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 3:06 am        Reply with quote

Wasn't this the plot to Lethal Weapon 2?
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 6:38 am        Reply with quote

Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater/Xe, is building up a merc army for the United Arab Emirates.

Quote:
Mr. Prince, who resettled here last year after his security business faced mounting legal problems in the United States, was hired by the crown prince of Abu Dhabi to put together an 800-member battalion of foreign troops for the U.A.E., according to former employees on the project, American officials and corporate documents obtained by The New York Times.

The force is intended to conduct special operations missions inside and outside the country, defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from terrorist attacks and put down internal revolts, the documents show. Such troops could be deployed if the Emirates faced unrest or were challenged by pro-democracy demonstrations in its crowded labor camps or democracy protests like those sweeping the Arab world this year.

_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2011 1:41 am        Reply with quote

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/05/welcome-to-the-debt-ceiling/

Hit the debt ceiling today. I guess that means something to someone.

Quote:
Today turns out to be the long-awaited day that the Treasury Department hits the debt ceiling. To be clear on what this means, it’s not that we’re “out of money”—the government’s been spending more than it takes in ever since George W Bush took office. Nor is it that we’re out of borrowing capacity—the global investment community is eager to lend money to the US government at some of the lowest rates on record. Rather, the Treasury Department has run out of legal authority to borrow. This is a big problem. And it’s a problem that has an easy solution. Barack Obama, John Boehner, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, and Nancy Pelosi all agree that the legal authority should be expanded. But Boehner and McConnell are saying that even though they favor an expansion of legal borrowing authority, they won’t agree to one until they get unrelated policy concessions.


Well, of course.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 1:36 am        Reply with quote

Revolution in Spain

Some good pictures: http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/05/a-defiant-spanish-revolution/100070/
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 10:27 am        Reply with quote

Ron Paul is too much of a wild card. I would be down for drug legalization/decriminalization and a more sensible foreign policy than being the world's police force* or flexing imperial ambitions but Ron Paul seems to want to return America to some kind of idealized (read: false) 19th century capitalist utopia. Yet, if you look at the history of that period it actually wasn't any fun for anyone except the same capitalist robber-baron wealthy elite types who sit atop the current economic food chain.

I might vote for Paul for laughs since I don't think he'd actually win and all the other candidates are just going to perpetuate the status quo but there is a real fear that if he did win it would result in changes to social policy that basically throw the most destitute among us under the bus. Unfortunately that might be the risk we are going to be forced to consider taking if we're to get some real change happening in this country but I don't know if it's a change I would want to believe in. If you could somehow indicate that a Ron Paul presidency isn't going to result in the country's poor starving and eventually rioting en masse after he successfully abolishes the welfare state then I might give him more serious consideration.

*though sometimes the world really does seem to need a police force. However, if the US is it then we're doing a terrible job of it because we only "intervene" in places where we obviously get something out of it and not purely for the humanitarian reasons that get played up because if that were the case we'd be intervening in Darfur and any number of other places as well as Libya. koholinttakeout was spot on with the observation that Libya is shaping up to be another Kosovo.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 12:12 pm        Reply with quote

Welp, if the proposed changes to the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (which was passed days after 9/11 to give the Executive the legal grounding to go after terrorists) go through as part of the National Defense Authorization Bill (which is up for consideration today or tomorrow) then it will be another nail in the coffin containing hope's corpse and the door will be flung wide open for continued, perpetual warfare across the globe and unfettered by any limitations.

I wish that was hyperbole but the exact changes the Republicans are seeking will result in precisely that happening. From New Republic:

Quote:
Given the great fear that gripped the country at the time, the AUMF was a pretty carefully written piece of work. While on the one hand, it permitted the president to use force at his discretion, on the other hand, it limited his decision-making by insisting that military action be tethered to September 11 and intended solely to prevent “future acts” of terrorism against the United States.

Fast on the heels of Osama bin Laden’s death, however, House Republicans have proposed a new AUMF, the language of which is very troubling. This version authorizes the president to use whatever military force he considers necessary and appropriate against those who “are part of, or are substantially supporting, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces.” The language insisting upon a connection to September 11 has been removed, along with the requirement that military action be intended to prevent “future acts” of terrorism against the United States. An even greater concern with the proposed AUMF is that no one quite knows what “forces” might be considered “associated,” or what “support” is “substantial.” Congress has not troubled itself with definitions. One would have hoped the Obama administration would have been more precise. After all, it is the entity that will wield this new power. But, in the fusty language only lawyers could love, the administration has said, “It is neither possible nor advisable … to attempt to identify, in the abstract, the precise nature and degree of ‘substantial support,’ or the precise characteristics of ‘associated forces,’ that are or would be sufficient to bring persons and organizations within the foregoing framework [of the AUMF].” They know it when they kill it, evidently.

This is not mere legislative tinkering, because the AUMF is what keeps the war within bounds. Without it, the president would act unilaterally, solely in his capacity as commander in chief. That was the much-lamented approach the Bush administration wanted to take; it chafed at the minor restrictions imposed by Congress and even pressed the extravagant view that the limits of the law are coterminous with the president’s wants and wishes. The Obama administration has so far taken the more responsible position that its power in the so-called “war on terror” derives entirely from the AUMF. If this is the principle the administration is operating from, however, when you change the AUMF, you change the war. And the new AUMF, with its nebulous definitions and lack of reference to September 11, would change the war for the worse. Moreover, it would have no expiration date, which means that the next president—President Bachmann, for instance—would inherit the new AUMF and all the power it bestows.


Yeah Ron Paul's not going to stop this from happening and even if he somehow becomes president he will probably not roll it back. The last guy I voted for in a presidential race was running on a similar platform and so far he's done nothing but constant 180s on all the big important shit he promised to do.

So yeah parker has it. Why vote? It won't stop the machine from rolling forward. All you can hope at this point is that it runs out of steam soon and collapses under its own weight. There is clearly a large enough majority of people in this country that desire to live under some form of perverse, unchecked authoritarianism and just as many who clearly don't care one way or the other. I say let them have it.

Oh and the Patriot Act was just given another four year extension with zero reforms but who didn't see that one coming.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 1:30 pm        Reply with quote

New Adam Curtis documentary, looking at the historical background that has led to the inter-connected technoculture we live in as well as the current financial crisis: All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:47 am        Reply with quote

Obama Administration Threatens Veto of Defense Bill Over Redefinition of AUMF

...among other things but the biggie is the threat to veto over the section redefining what the AUMF authorizes in the war on terror. I've got my fingers crossed but I suspect there will be some bs "compromise" that leaves intact some of the more ambiguous language of the redefinition since the door-in-the-face technique is quite an effective persuasion method.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 11:41 am        Reply with quote

That his voting record has been consistent with his principles is a huge plus in favor of his character, yeah. It makes it seem less likely that he'd just turn around and do the opposite of what he promised once in office, even though the nature of the office means that's still a possibility. But realistically I just don't see the GOP backing Paul so it's a moot point anyway. He was on the ballot in like two states in 2008, right? Though at this point the GOP don't really have any other decent candidates so in this kind of environment he might have a real chance if he gets party support but the party doesn't like the guy for obvious reasons. Also his extreme views pretty much guarantee that he'll only ever get a small slice of the vote since the more "moderate" candidates can use him as a bogeyman and make their own fucked up ideas seem reasonable by comparison.

As for him wanting to eliminate "needless bureaucracies", yeah, sounds good and all but I think it's a bit more complicated than that. I do think that at present if you do away with all those departments and try to unload all the functions they perform on the states it would probably be disastrous. State governments are no less susceptible to cronyism and mismanagement than at the federal level (and you could even argue they are more so) and many of them barely function as it is. I don't really have any real answer beyond that at the moment, I'd need to do some research first.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 1:07 am        Reply with quote

Good food for thought, koholinttakeout. You should post in this thread more often!
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:22 pm        Reply with quote

koholinttakeout wrote:
The concept/article/book I was mentioning is actually spelt "demosclerosis" and its about how interest-group activism and redisturbative programs hurt the government's ability to adapt to changing situations and circumstances.


This seems to be the one you're speaking of, and fortunately there are about 14 used copies still in stock. I'll have to check this out, it sounds very relevant (not exactly the most flattering review of the book but it does seem to give a fair airing of the ideas presented within).
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:34 pm        Reply with quote

costel wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/01/florida.welfare.drug.testing/index.html?iref=allsearch

Thoughts?


Quote:
(CNN) -- Saying it is "unfair for Florida taxpayers to subsidize drug addiction," Gov. Rick Scott on Tuesday signed legislation requiring adults applying for welfare assistance to undergo drug screening.


Why stop with poor people on welfare? Why not drug test people looking to buy a house since home ownership is also heavily subsidized by taxpayer dollars? Oh right because Republicans etc.

Terrible program thought up by terrible people.

related: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/18/lonnie-napier-welfare-drug-testing_n_810577.html <-Seems Kentucky had the same idea. As if being poor and needing welfare wasn't already a terrible place to be in being forced to undergo drug testing to get benefits is like rubbing salt in an open wound.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:57 pm        Reply with quote

There's http://www.fabathome.org/ for 3D printing stuff. I want to build one myself at some point, but I don't know what I'd make with it yet.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:41 am        Reply with quote

koholinttakeout wrote:
let's realize that the harms you describe are the status quo.


True but this might be why the harms themselves are so outrageous to anyone with any sense of common decency, no? Not to imply that you lack decency, you seem to agree at least that the status quo has some serious problems that need addressing.

koholinttakeout wrote:
Also, since you like to think of the US government as running a racket, you might want to read "War Making and State Making as Organized Crime" by Charles Tilly-its a pretty interesting theory about how the modern state is itself a kind of crime syndicate.


Another interesting-sounding book recommendation! I'm going to have to start a list if you keep up with this ;)

Anyway, while the idea of the state-as-crime-syndicate holds some appeal to me I think it sounds more like a pessimistic interpretation of the current state of things than an accurate appraisal of the totality of the situation. Though I won't really be able to say one way or the other until I read the book, I suppose.

However, whether the modern state really is a kind of crime syndicate or just happens to look like one is ultimately irrelevant if the outputs of the state and crime syndicates start matching up too closely, which I assume is the initial connection the book makes and then expounds on. If that's true that the outputs are in fact similar then it is indicative of a real problem that needs to be identified, understood and dealt with. Even though in the end the kind of theory that this book seems to espouse might not end up being the correct way of framing the problem, but hey I guess we have to start somewhere.

koholinttakeout wrote:
I just think I need more of an explanation of why you buy some of these arguments regarding war profiteering and the unstoppable forces guiding the American government to fight endless wars. And sorry if I came off as contradictory/condescending/rushed-I had to just type this out real fast.


Speaking from my own experience I've found that all humans are only ever able to really grasp at best parts of the bigger picture, so it might just be that we're coming at the same problem but from different directions. As an outsider, someone who isn't really that close to the world of the military-industrial complex (except through family members who are both active duty and retired), all I can really tell is that there is a lot of human suffering being produced by the various forces at play in the world. And while I can appreciate that there is definitely more nuance to the situation than I can comprehend at the moment it does seem apparent that within this complicated ecology of war and misery there are those who gain a lot from the whole thing.

Whether or not their gain is (un)intentional or (un)directed doesn't seem as important because either way the outputs still add up to the same amounts of human misery. The entire problem is just incomprehensible past a certain point. That somehow everyone individually desires a general peace but the entire history of humankind has been one of nothing but eternal warfare. So really I think the kind of cynicism that seems to be expressed by Vikram is probably born out of a general idealism which I think is present in most people at one time or another. Idealism grounded in the belief that this is not the best of all possible worlds, and just accepting the reality of just how rotten and seriously fucked up the status quo happens to be simply is not enough to start curbing the output of the misery machine. And I think that kind of view is just as much of a rational response to the inscrutability of the whole thing as perhaps more tempered assessments.

Which, rereading this, seems to be a whole lot of words to say a whole lot of nothing but I hope you get the gist at least.

koholinttakeout wrote:
Last note: I'm leaving for a week. That should mean that there will be a ton of interesting shit happening. Over the last six months, every single time I've been in the field there's been crazy shit happening. The Arizona shooting, the Egyptian revolution and the Japan earthquake/tsunami/nuclear disaster each happened the last three times I've been gone. Hooray!


Take care and stay safe out there. Crazy shit happening on a regular basis seems par for the course these past few years. Hopefully whatever ends up happening and holding our collective attention for a few moments while you're gone this time won't be too seriously disastrous.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion


Last edited by Mr. Mechanical on Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:47 am; edited 4 times in total
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:42 pm        Reply with quote

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110601/01515014500/senators-want-to-put-people-jail-embedding-youtube-videos.shtml
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:52 am        Reply with quote

Your phone/internet/email/everything is still tapped just fyi.

I mean it's old news by now but just to underscore the point every phone number you dial, email you send, and person you talk to online or through your various other digital devices are all recorded and stored forever by the NSA who can do a google-style search of the information any time they wish. You have no privacy from the prying eyes of the US government because you might be a terrorist now or at some point in the future but in order for them to do their job in protecting you they need to be able to operate in total and complete secrecy as they spy on you. America is the new Soviet Union, comrades!

Reading this article I experience a mix of emotions. Anger comes on first, of course, as it usually does followed by a kind of depressed melancholy because I realize that this is normalized now. It has become the status quo and it will persist for at least a generation or two longer because 1) most Americans are probably still largely unaware of the true extent to which they have no privacy, 2) those who are most aware of how wrong this is and who are constantly trying to bring it to larger public awareness are largely in no position to actually affect any change, and 3) outside of a handful of congressmen and senators the people running the government and its various fiefdoms views these programs as a good and necessary thing to have around and have no intention of really changing them now that they are established.

The more I learn about this kind of stuff the more defeated I feel because I can't think of any way to effectively fight this. Even trying to fight it "the right way" and nonviolently and such like Drake (whom the article is about) will still bring you under the attention of the people in power and if they see you as a threat they will increasingly do whatever it takes to neutralize you. You can't just put the "right" sort of people in charge of these programs either because the power they endow is too corrosive, so any change in leadership will be largely ineffective as the majority of the new leadership becomes corrupted or perverted by power.

Just one more cause for despair in our modern world. If I didn't believe that there was some sort of cosmic balancing effect that was always going on throughout the universe I might become a true doomsayer and add my voice to those internet legions who already believe that America (and through America, the rest of the world) is beyond all hope. I just remind myself of that axiom from physics, that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. I can convince myself that we're already seeing the reaction to this kind of perverse power in the world coming from organizations like Wikileaks or the entire revolutionary wave that is sweeping the world, so I can still believe that maybe it's not too late after all and somehow things won't be so fucked up in the future.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:15 pm        Reply with quote

Thanks for those, sawtooth. I'm about halfway through the second link now. Very fun (and informative!) reading.

edit-Part 3 is turning out to be the real winner of the bunch though. Goddamn.

edit2-That felt really cathartic reading all of that.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:06 pm        Reply with quote

Study shows why over 30 percent of USA never uses 'Net

Like, never ever uses it.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 3:06 am        Reply with quote

Glad you're back and I look forward to reading your response. A new thread for that discussion might be better since there is clearly a lot of ground to cover, but I don't really care one way or the other.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mechanical
ontological terrorist


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: Scare Room 99

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:25 pm        Reply with quote

Those are common criticisms, yes. I agree with 2 but am not sure about 1. There are definitely plenty of ideologues, idiots and true believers of various stripes running our institutions but there are also just as many self-styled cold logicians realpolitiking about trying to make what seem to them the most pragmatic or rational decisions. I think the people in the second group are just as susceptible to their own kinds of weaknesses as the first group (though their weaknesses obviously will not always be the same) and probably more than we realize.

So, basically, everyone has the potential to be a fuck-up. Not just the usual suspects. And the people we would think of as least likely to be fuck-ups probably have a greater chance of being fuck-ups than we think. The higher up the political food chain you go the harder it is to make a decision that doesn't have some negative affect on someone somewhere under you. Good decision-makers do just as much to mitigate or minimize damages they cause or know they will likely cause as they do to make decisions that will have the widest range of positive effects.
_________________

internisus wrote:
You are a pretty fucked up guy.

True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Quick Reply
 Attach signature
 Notify on replies

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    selectbutton Forum Index -> GBF 120% All times are GMT
Goto page
// Prev  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Page 11 of 13

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group