selectbutton
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile / Ignoring   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Current Events Thread
Goto page Prev  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    selectbutton Forum Index -> GBF 120%
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:16 am        Reply with quote

vision wrote:
I hope Hitchens' cancer catches him on a better note than that.

His essay about it in Vanity Fair was enough to make me change my mind about him for a while. It was something as humane and straightforward as Barbara Ehrenreich's recollection of breast cancer treatment in Brightsided.


vision wrote:
sawtooth wrote:
I use radical in the tubular sense


Julian Assange, how do you plead in front of cool court
_________________
(  (  


Last edited by sawtooth on Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:34 am; edited 3 times in total
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:23 am        Reply with quote

Peter Schiff and Joseph Farah in a single documentary? Be still, my beating heart
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:03 pm        Reply with quote

CubaLibre wrote:
sawtooth wrote:
psiga wrote:

sawtooth wrote:
make no mistake: what WL is doing is radical with a capital R.

I enjoy, in a grim way, how many folks see this as Radical, yet when a government that spends as much on its military as all other developed nations combined decides to lie its way into a war, that is not perceived as being even more Radical.


Who, me? I use radical in the sense that it seeks to change the way politics and business are run in a very fundamental way. The government lying its way into an international conflict has been pretty old hat for awhile.

I think we should preserve the world in its original leftist connotation. The substitution of "radical" for "extreme" devalues the concept. As you point out, the military-industrial complex isn't even reactionary, it's just plain old conservative. Meanwhile Islamic "radicals" are in fact reactionaries - they seek the reimposition of an ancient and defunct empire.


I agree that it should be a term for the left. Except even assuming that "left" has a general Marxist idea as a reference point. pegging "radical" as leftist as such opens up a semantic rabbit hole:

A liberal critique of an ancient religion that has been around for millennia (Christian or Muslim) is pretty easy to define as radical. A leftist critique of something new, shocking, or modern, makes it harder to define. To make an example of something I'm a bit more familiar with: It's pretty easy to dismiss Jonathan Meades or Owen Hatherley as reactionaries, given their affinity with the radicalism of the past.

How would you classify a leftist distaste for things that are completely New and Modern? Damien Hirst's artwork? Dubai's architecture?
_________________
(  (  


Last edited by sawtooth on Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:11 pm        Reply with quote

CubaLibre wrote:
sawtooth wrote:
How would you classify a leftist distaste for things that are completely New and Modern? Damien Hirst's artwork? Dubai's architecture?

I wouldn't attach the world to a particular ideological program like marxism or socialism. It's relative: radicalism asks for something that has not been done before. Reactionism asks for something that has come and gone.


I thought it was a given that "leftism" is more or less defined by readings and critiques of marx; less a specific program and more of a body of critical thought. So what in the world does 'preserving the word in its leftist connotation' mean?
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:42 pm        Reply with quote

Isfet wrote:
what i seem to have gathered re: the sex charges is that he was possibly in violation of some kind of obscure law that doesn't allow for sex without a condom. so...


It's a bit more than that (apparently there is an actual rape charge in there):
http://www.salon.com/news/wikileaks/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/12/07/julian_assange_rape_accuser_smeared

AFAIK neither the judge nor the defense have seen the evidence for the case since he turned himself in.

I think it's reasonable to assume that the charges aren't trumped up, but the urgency and pressure to prosecute & convict him certainly point to heavy pressure from outside the case.
_________________
(  (  


Last edited by sawtooth on Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:24 pm        Reply with quote

This isn't the only account I've read that pegs Ron Paul as something a more than a few steps removed from "libertarian."

Dracko wrote:
http://isberniesandersstilltalking.com/


No RSS? bullcrap
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:43 pm        Reply with quote

how is loughner's mindset not a tea party mindset
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:11 pm        Reply with quote

Take It Sleazy wrote:
i basically only say that as partial caution because his favorite books from his youtube and myspace pages seem to be all over the political spectrum and he seems to have more mental problems than just tea party views


Yeah, I saw that. But reading list aside, the incoherent right wing mishmash that constitutes his political views is nothing out of the ordinary even among our elected officials.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:12 am        Reply with quote

negativedge wrote:
well ok whatever that's your definition of a descriptor. my point is some dude walks into a grocery store and shoots people in the head and we're worried about who he voted for


oh you
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:12 am        Reply with quote

negativedge wrote:
no, it doesn't. it has to do with sanity. he's not an assassin; he's a nutjob


nutjobs are also assassins

edit: in fact, it might be a prerequisite for the job.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:07 am        Reply with quote

Mr. Mechanical wrote:
If a crazy person uses politics to rationalize their actions, does that make their actions politically motivated? Right now my gut is telling me "No" but at the same time I'm also having a hard time determining the difference (if any) between genuine crazy and politically motivated crazy.

At any rate some people died yesterday for completely unnecessary reasons. That's already bad enough. And if the guy really is that crazy then who's to say the right demagogue or bit of rhetoric couldn't have incited him to try and kill a Republican instead?


my gut tells me yes. Actions speak louder than words, and certainly a lot louder than someone's internal monologue at the time they're doing the deed.

There seem to be a conspicuous absence of leftwing demagogues urging violent action against elected officials. It's not as if he had an equal chance of wandering into Kaczynski(? That's all I'm coming up with atm)'s jail cell and coming away thinking shooting a republican was a good idea. Just saying.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:24 pm        Reply with quote

Dracko wrote:
No patience for those complaining about "policisation" of Gifford's assault. The attempted assassination of a politician is political.

Of course, since a white man did this, it's "complicated". You don't see that happening with other terrorist attacks. No, no, those are clear cut black and white deals which should justify nuking the Middle East.


right on cue, http://www.boingboing.net/2011/01/09/why-the-shootings-me-1.html
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:01 am        Reply with quote

there is no such thing as society
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:05 am        Reply with quote

Mr. Mechanical wrote:
sawtooth wrote:
there is no such thing as society


IAWTP


you, extralife, and thatcher.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:13 am        Reply with quote

http://chinamieville.net/post/2795203929/he-is-a-haitian-and-as-such-is-free-to-return-home
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:14 am        Reply with quote

Loki Laufeyson wrote:
why are school boards allowed to have politcal leanings in the first place? surely that can only lead to indoctrination? all schools should be like summerhill anyway.

in other news, there's a 13th sign of the zodiac now.


exactly how would you root out politics from a school board
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:38 pm        Reply with quote

love that music
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:18 pm        Reply with quote

i know it's not him but it would be so great if that was *the* george lazenby. His twitter is great
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:17 am        Reply with quote

Cocaine Socialist wrote:
FOX NEWS


sewn
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:33 pm        Reply with quote

Flylighter wrote:
CRUSH THE UNIONS - CRUSH THE UNIONS - CRUSH THE UNIONS - oh and also let me make no-bid sales of state assets but shhhhhhhhh

And the direct PDF of the bill in question, with the goods on page 24. Campaign contributor paybacks, here we come!

Wonder how he's going to react to being called out. It'll be like watching a cat try to bury a turd on a tile floor.


I figured that whatever replaced a lukewarm democratic governor was going to be a lukewarm republican, but I can't stop being surprised at what a fucking creep this guy is.

He's going to hold his ground. I can't think of a reason why he wouldn't.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:05 am        Reply with quote

Mr. Mechanical wrote:
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/03/is-egypts-military-turning-against-the-revolution/71859/


as i've read it, they were never "for" it; they assisted the protesters on the assumption that any revolutionary changes to egypt's government were going to cosmetic. Once Mubarak was out, it was supposed to be business as usual. There appeared to be a growing wave of strikes in Egypt a couple of weeks ago; it's hard to find articles mentioning them after the military announced a crackdown on labor protests.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:16 am        Reply with quote

It is the supposed "liberals" that are letting this happen. It is no coincidence that the same people who produced "An inconvenient truth" made "waiting for superman". I would love love love for the progressive consensus on education to be changed . No to education "reform", no to charter schools, no to privatization and corporatization. Fuck anyone who says otherwise.

The unions have already given up their privileges, which is too much. I would love to see harm to come to anyone who questions their rights. I mean this whole heartedly: when scott walker's bloody head is paraded down state street on a pole past granola shops and yuppie ethnic food stores, it means that the work of thinking people in the state of wisconsin has only begun. shame that it won't ever happen.

I'm drunk. Don't delete this. good night.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:50 am        Reply with quote

heads on stakes
http://www.weau.com/home/headlines/BREAKING_State_Republican_Senators_to_vote_on_collective_bargaining_without_Democrats_117698403.html
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:47 pm        Reply with quote

vision wrote:
Quote:
Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) protested that he had not had a chance to even see what was in the resolution before the vote was taken.
“I need to know what was removed. I need to know that,” Barca said.
The public, the media and the Democrats were not allowed to see the resolution before the Republicans voted on it.
“This is clearly a violation of the open meetings law,” Barca yelled, as Scott Fitzgerald called for the vote and struck the gavel to adjourn the meeting.
Barca said state law requires at least 24 hours notice before a conference committee hearing can be convened.


http://www.biztimes.com/daily/2011/3/9/republicans-ram-through-bill-to-revoke-collective-bargaining


here's the footage:

_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:20 pm        Reply with quote

Dracko wrote:
ahahahahahaha

jesus christ
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:12 am        Reply with quote

So much equivocation, Psiga. Why wouldn't you be interested in forgetting what the unions have become? Have you already forgotten the forces that bent them that way?
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:13 am        Reply with quote

Oh, right. SciEncE!!! ftw!!!!
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:34 am        Reply with quote

no.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:52 am        Reply with quote

The central thesis of demosclerosis makes it seem in line with the ideology of 'post-partisan' bloomberg/brookings institute -style pundits. a large cup of lukewarm spit.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:50 am        Reply with quote

Quote:
sawtooth: Interesting take on demosclerosis. I sort of thought it would be more akin to what happened in New Zealand from 1984-1990, where the Fourth Labour Government just wrecked house on the mixed economy and took on nearly every interest group. The same sort of thing looks like it might be happening in Britain today with the Coalition Government, though its too early to tell there, probably. Either way, it looks like overcoming demosclerosis necessarily means going beyond the traditional conceptions of left/right and pissing off everybody. I don't really see Bloomberg nor Brookings is really in that mold-the only thing either of them did was ban smoking and fun and advocate for the Iraq War. Then again, I don't know enough about either in terms of consistent policy perspectives to speak intelligently.


After reading the capsule summary of demosclerosis on amazon and writing my previous post, i looked up the author and found he is currently a writer-in-residence at the brookings institute, which is no surprise.

I lump them all under the banner of third-way democrats. The things that stuck out to me were

a: The idea that america is in a permanent crisis that demands 'tough decisions'. The handwringing over debt and moral decay is the same as it was two days ago, 15 years ago, 30 years ago. I don't particularly care what specific cocktail of tough medicine Rauch proposes, as it usually consists of the same 'post partisan' neoliberal reforms: pissing off the AARP means putting social security under the axe, pissing off Greenpeace means selling off national forest, Saying no to the unions means no longer defending the right to organize, and so on.
b: The conclusion that more power must be invested in the executive branch to do accomplish the agenda noted in point a.
Authoritarianism will save democracy, war is peace, etc. I take it that 'citizen-whiner' is a phrase lifted directly from the book.
c: The equivocation of corporate lobbying power with said citizen-whiners. This seems false.

edit: of course, i may be getting it all wrong, but the general tone and context makes me believe I've seen this all before.
_________________
(  (  


Last edited by sawtooth on Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:57 am        Reply with quote

http://www.mrdestructo.com/2011/05/wailing-walls-bela-lugosis-dead-part-i.html
http://www.mrdestructo.com/2011/06/wailing-walls-bela-lugosis-dead-part-ii.html
http://www.mrdestructo.com/2011/06/wailing-walls-bela-lugosis-dead-part.html i enjoyed these (as far as that phrase can be considered relevant), please take a look
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:29 pm        Reply with quote

a brief exchange between Eric Holder and David Simon
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 5:54 am        Reply with quote

I remain unconvinced that you need secrets to get out of problems that secrecy gets you into

This massive, ugly, unnecessary state security apparatus certainly didn't grow without a little watering
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:02 am        Reply with quote

Dracko wrote:
Another day in Amerikkka.

"Depraved-heart murder", Jesus fucking Christ.


What the fuck is wrong with us
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:37 pm        Reply with quote

I'm so glad the economy is recovering. Thanks everyone, we did it.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:24 am        Reply with quote

Takashi wrote:
Pretty sad seeing media jumping at the chance of a new, dramatic Al-Qaeda terrorism story over the Oslo bombing, when the link is pretty tenuous.


This initial reaction from reuters made me really angry: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/22/us-europe-groups-idUSTRE76L3P120110722

What a load of scaremongering racist bullshit
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:52 am        Reply with quote

Broco wrote:

CubaLibre wrote:
Don't worry, it's just good cop/bad cop shenanigans designed to make people accept cuts to services and continue to enrich financiers.

http://exiledonline.com/get-ready-for-tarp-2-0/


That's basically the left-wing inversion of the Tea Party attitude I mentioned.


i suppose the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 7:09 pm        Reply with quote

Mr. Mechanical wrote:
So wait, a guy shot at police who then shot him. And people are rioting over it? Is there really nothing more going on here? Because if it's really just people in Britain not used to gun violence then that kind of blows my mind.

Then again, if you're going to riot over something it might as well be something like gun violence. Americans only seem to riot when their basketball team loses.

There was a very similar incident that happened a couple months ago not more than 20 or so miles from where I live where a guy got shot and killed by police after a shootout. It made the nightly news but nobody got super upset about it. Even the guy's family was like "yeah we're upset but what was he thinking". I mean I think there's a huge, systemic problem in America with police brutality and etc. but I find it hard to fault any police for shooting back when fired upon. What were the Brits expecting the police to do in that situation?


Two relevant bits i've read so far:
Quote:
7.35pm: Initial ballistics tests on the bullet that lodged in a police officer's radio when Mark Duggan died on Thursday night show it was a police issue bullet, the Guardian understands.

Quote:
2.44pm: Returning to the reports a girl was involved in an altercation with police – here an eyewitness tells the BBC that a female was "set upon" by police. It was subsequently discovered she was 16, the witness says, which provoked a surge forward in her defence by people at the scene.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/aug/07/tottenham-riots-police-duggan-live
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:10 am        Reply with quote

The Top Ten Ways news websites ruined themselves in the name of gaming search engines for ad revenue
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:02 am        Reply with quote

I havent been following the wisconsin elections as closely as I should. Digby's blog is bringing me up to speed, though:

Quote:
At this point in the evening, two Democratic wins out of six in the recalls and a lot of questions about a third (coming down to the same Republican activist who was suspected of rigging the Supreme Court election last April.)Remember that these were all GOP districts.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/wisconsin.html

Quote:
Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Mike Tate following evidence of election tampering in the 8th State Senate District race: "The race to determine control of the Wisconsin Senate has fallen in the hands of the Waukesha County clerk, who has already distinguished herself as incompetent, if not worse. She is once more tampering with the results of a consequential election and in the next hours we will determine our next course of action. For now, Wisconsin should know that a dark cloud hangs over these important results."

http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/

This last issue is especially important to note: Kathy Nickolaus (the waukesha county clerk in question) is if not entirely incompetent a complete scumbag:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/07/964645/-Kathy-Nickolaus-in-Waukesha-forgot-to-saveReally
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/12/966070/-The-Follies-of-Kathy-Nickolaus:-A-Quick-Review
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
sawtooth
heh


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Location: flashback

PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 5:35 am        Reply with quote

"Needless to say I did not mean to use any offensive racist term and was referring to the urban jungle."

lol
_________________
(  (  
Unfilter / Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message
Quick Reply
 Attach signature
 Notify on replies

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    selectbutton Forum Index -> GBF 120% All times are GMT
Goto page Prev  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group