|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Gin banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:36 am |
|
|
| Guys maybe art is just a feeling. An emotion or instinct that's just too fucking complex for us to understand, so we just kind of feel it out. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:38 am |
|
|
i have four ^_~
does anyone want one of them? _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JamesE banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:41 am |
|
|
My point was more that you're very pompous and arrogant and it's very obnoxious to even approach trying to talk to you, Eric. Ergo why I usually just make a few one liners than try not to think about it too much, lest I grate my teeth down very small indeed.
The Merchant of Venice is a pretty complex historical work which either ends up as an anti-Jewish popularist piece, a subversive attack on racial and religious prejudice, or a commentary on the nature of repentance*. It owes nothing to the biological or survivalist drives. That for me and for many, many other people is art. I also think the arrangement of fridge magnets is wonderful art. So would Clares Oldenburg, if he's not to busy being really old.
Your view of art is stilted and dogmatic. I expect you're pleased with it but it doesn't make you look half as clever or insightful as you think it does. Art is not autism (although autistics can produce wonderful, wonderful art).
*You may notice there is very little of this in Invasion of the Darleks |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JamesE banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:54 am |
|
|
Here's some more wonderful retorical art:
| Quote: |
Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of tired, outstripped Five-Nines6 that dropped behind.
Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! – An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling,
And flound'ring like a man in fire or lime . . .
Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.
If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est
Pro patria mori. |
Deny that and you deny a man who died in the last embers of World War One... I'm not really sure how anyone can say that isn't some of the finest art in existence. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Adilegian Rogue Scholar

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Q*Bert Killscreen Nightmare
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:58 am |
|
|
I've been thinking and writing about this matter over the past couple of days, and I came up with a pretty comprehensive outline about my stance on art. I think it cuts out a lot of bullshit. And lo! this thread has beaten its banks with such swelling current.
http://www.adilegian.com/ArtOutline.pdf
It's useful to sit down and rigorously drill yourself on what you honestly think about a given subject once every few years. This was this year's grille on Art. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JamesE banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:05 am |
|
|
| I don't agree with you all the time Adilegian but you're a really interesting person. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Predator Goose
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Location: Oversensitive Pedantic Ninny
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:09 am |
|
|
JamesE, Eric made some remarks about what he thought art was. That didn't agree with what you thought art was, so you made fun of him. That's called juvenile.
I understand that you don't want to spend the time to respond to everyone else's ideas, but if you end up having to explain yourself anyways, wouldn't it make it faster to explain up front, and make you look like less of a dick? Or find some one liners that don't sound like personal attacks so people don't feel the need to defend themselves? _________________ I can no longer shop happily. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Adilegian Rogue Scholar

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Q*Bert Killscreen Nightmare
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:11 am |
|
|
| JamesE wrote: |
| I don't agree with you all the time Adilegian but you're a really interesting person. |
That's all I want, really!
EDIT: I like the Winfred Owen. James Fenton's got a great essay on Owen's work, if you're interested. It's collected in the book "The Strength of Poetry: Oxford Lectures." Hell, all the essays are really good. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Focus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:19 am |
|
|
Hey guys I made a doodie.
 _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JamesE banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:30 am |
|
|
| Predator Goose wrote: |
JamesE, Eric made some remarks about what he thought art was. That didn't agree with what you thought art was, so you made fun of him. That's called juvenile.
I understand that you don't want to spend the time to respond to everyone else's ideas, but if you end up having to explain yourself anyways, wouldn't it make it faster to explain up front, and make you look like less of a dick? Or find some one liners that don't sound like personal attacks so people don't feel the need to defend themselves? |
I presented a counterpoint and a quote from two pretty well regarded artists, with the intent of it generating some kind of intelligent rebuttal or modification of the initial stance. I don't usually put that amount of effort into responding to Aderack, because he seriously seems to think he has everything worked out definitively, innocent of things like constructed arguments or citations. His response was that he'd got it all worked out in the usual (seemingly) smug, arrogant, tone, which I usually find pretty objectionable. That's why I don't respond to aderack beyond one-liners, usually. I'll spell that out now so I don't get another snotty private message.
I mean... if anyone's going to work out art it's going to be a poet or a lover or a fighter, not a dude who gets paid to write long, citation and fact-check light rambling essays on Dr Who and jRPG installments, don't you think? The Livejournal he writes for his cat is utterly amazing art though, and I swear to christ I mean that when I say it.
(I'm serious about the Catjournal, Eric) |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JamesE banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:31 am |
|
|
Post needs more weird naked German cartoon people |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Intentionally Wrong

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:32 am |
|
|
Remind me again why it's important that we define what is and is not art, in this thread?
To paraphrase XKCD: it doesn't matter what Michael Gondry tells his kid about videogames. Decide for yourself whether art and games have anything to do with one another, and let that be enough. _________________ JSNLV is frequently and intentionally wrong. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Focus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:32 am |
|
|
| Focus wrote: |
Hey guys I made a doodie.
 |
_________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JamesE banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:33 am |
|
|
| Focus wrote: |
| Focus wrote: |
Hey guys I made a doodie.
 |
|
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:48 am |
|
|
| JamesE wrote: |
| Focus wrote: |
| Focus wrote: |
Hey guys I made a doodie.
 |
|
|
This is going to be epic. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:52 am |
|
|
Man, Thom Yorke.
Thom Yorke, you know what? He's a pretty good guy.
(Avoiding the Cave Story thing, that was Jonny)
He's a pretty good guy because he can play the guitar better than me, and he can complete songs, and he can put lyrics in there, and some people think he's a genius, and . . . and . . .
He consistently types "it's" when he means "its".
Here's for small victories, or something. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
rabite gets whacked!

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:01 am |
|
|
| Jonny's got the better ideas of the two, I think. Thom has a lovely voice when he's not going overboard. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:10 am |
|
|
| rabite gets whacked! wrote: |
| Jonny's got the better ideas of the two, I think. Thom has a lovely voice when he's not going overboard. |
Yeah, JG is a pretty swell guy from what I hear. Also I can't deny that he probably has actual artistic talent for composing music. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
SplashBeats Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:49 am |
|
|
| The man can play like 10 instruments. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ebrey
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:56 am |
|
|
| Intentionally Wrong wrote: |
| Remind me again why it's important that we define what is and is not art, in this thread? |
To drive people crazy! 'Games are art' topics are like annual stupidityfests, regularly filled with the dumbest posts on IC/SB. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Adilegian Rogue Scholar

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Q*Bert Killscreen Nightmare
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:02 am |
|
|
| Intentionally Wrong wrote: |
| Remind me again why it's important that we define what is and is not art, in this thread? |
It's pretty fun to talk about when everyone's interested in what others have to say. Which I am! _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Cryo

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Columbia, MD
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:07 am |
|
|
| Ebrey wrote: |
| Intentionally Wrong wrote: |
| Remind me again why it's important that we define what is and is not art, in this thread? |
To drive people crazy! 'Games are art' topics are like annual stupidityfests, regularly filled with the dumbest posts on IC/SB. |
Agreed. A game is a friggin game. _________________ PS3 - Cryoh
X360 - Cryoh |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Intentionally Wrong

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:23 am |
|
|
| Cryo wrote: |
| Ebrey wrote: |
| Intentionally Wrong wrote: |
| Remind me again why it's important that we define what is and is not art, in this thread? |
To drive people crazy! 'Games are art' topics are like annual stupidityfests, regularly filled with the dumbest posts on IC/SB. |
Agreed. A game is a friggin game. |
Which is to say, "it is not art", which is just to further the whole fucking cycle.
Let's merge this thread with all the others, sticky it, and then forbid discussion of whether games are or are not art outside of it, before we all drown in bile. _________________ JSNLV is frequently and intentionally wrong. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:29 am |
|
|
| Joe wrote: |
| The man can play like 10 instruments. |
Yeah. And you know, I daresay if you can play ten instruments, you can probably fuckin' play them all.
So yeah, definitely
Score: +5, Respect
for JG _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ratoslov

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:36 am |
|
|
| It's art if people discuss it. An artist is someone who produces work for the purpose of making something interesting to discuss. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
chevluh
Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:43 am |
|
|
| When Shigeru Miyamoto went in france to get his medal/title thingie some time ago, he was asked the "are videogames art?" question, and amusingly, for him the answer is no. Apparently to him it's a culture, not an art. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:41 pm |
|
|
| JamesE wrote: |
| The Merchant of Venice is a pretty complex historical work which either ends up as an anti-Jewish popularist piece, a subversive attack on racial and religious prejudice, or a commentary on the nature of repentance*. It owes nothing to the biological or survivalist drives. That for me and for many, many other people is art. I also think the arrangement of fridge magnets is wonderful art. So would Clares Oldenburg, if he's not to busy being really old. |
See. What you're missing or ignoring here is that it isn't that the work itself is art, it's that the work itself is a vessel for art -- in the same way that words aren't meaning; they convey meaning.
The word is often misused to refer to things. It only really applies to ideas. Works of art communicate those ideas; they aren't ideas in and of themselves. All they are is paint on canvas, or ink on a page. Without communication, they're nothing.
Considering that you just listed out a pile of ideas communicated by that particular work as evidence for why it's so important, you don't seem to disagree on principle. You just seem to be pointlessly acting like an ass toward me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:49 pm |
|
|
| JamesE wrote: |
| I don't usually put that amount of effort into responding to Aderack, because he seriously seems to think he has everything worked out definitively, innocent of things like constructed arguments or citations. His response was that he'd got it all worked out in the usual (seemingly) smug, arrogant, tone, which I usually find pretty objectionable. |
See, the issue here is that I do have it worked out (at least as far as it goes), and that your (itself antagonistic) response was based on either a misreading of or a failure to read what I wrote. This seems to be the basis of a lot of your screaming at me. I think maybe your blood pressure would go down a few notches if you'd work on your reading comprehension a little.
Seriously, it happens so frequently that I'm a little amazed. And I'm not trying to be rude here. Besides you, James, I don't think I've encountered anyone who so consistently misconstrues what I've said and then so consistently refuses to listen to any later clarifications. I don't know why it keeps happening. Since I don't really have this problem with other people, I've got to conclude it's on your end.
I mean. I'm not even the only person you respond to like this, for what seems like the same reason -- not so much a tacit disagreement as a failure to communicate. So. I'm not sure what other conclusion I should make.
Maybe it doesn't help, my responding so snippily; it's just, after a certain point it starts to feel deliberate on your end. It would be one thing if you'd accept the idea that maybe you didn't get everything right the first time, and maybe further discussion could clear things up. Instead, you generally dig in your heels and start in on the insults. So, you know, why should I try?
That was, incidentally, the point of that message I sent you. I tried to suggest maybe if you'd quit jumping to conclusions about everything I say, and responded civilly, I'd try to respond the same way. How did you respond? By openly mocking me. Again, what am I expected to do here? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JamesE banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:13 pm |
|
|
| Eric-Jon Rössel Waugh wrote: |
| See. What you're missing or ignoring here is that it isn't that the work itself is art, it's that the work itself is a vessel for art -- in the same way that words aren't meaning; they convey meaning. |
One might as well try and claim that a sequence of DNA's endless replication is simply to serve as container for the human soul. There's a Keith Haring sculpture in Morocco, covered with bird shit. I've seen it with my own eyes. It's not some sort of crazy dualist receptacle for a dead man's thought forms, it's a funky dancing figure set in the grounds of Yves Saint Lauren's crazy blue house in Marrakech. The grounds, the city, the house and the bird shit all comprise my memory of the work. It doesn't have any kind of Telos or intrinsic, objective meaning waiting for wee Eric-Jon to come slouching along to tappy-tap at with his chisel-like thesaurus. Objectively, it is matter shaped to the whims of a man who died in 1990 which was covered with bird shit in Morrocco. Subjectively it is whatever the hell anyone wants it to be. I liked it a lot.
If art does convey only one true meaning then it is lost to mankind forever, even to your colossal onmi-mind. Keith Harring could only arrange matter then set it free to the world for the world to pass many judgments on. You can imitate his work but never perfectly - all he left behind was matter, photographs and interviews. They are his works, form indivisible from creative process. Warhol automated things a bit more, but the design is as important - if not much, much more so - than his original intent. Warhol wanted to make a lot of trinkets quickly. In Warhol's case a reproduction is as apt and good as the original because he intended it to be but it's the viewer's reaction to the phyiscal object that's important. Where's the meaning contained in a Warhol?
Wilfred Owen didn't sit in the trenches furiously radiating psychic thought-waves, he left an assemblage of words. We'll never truly be sure what they mean, because he could only ever explain them with more words and anyway, he's been dead 90 for years. The words he use restricted and empowered him, hence they are the art. A house is indivisible from it's bricks. Houses are art. So is dogshit on a New York pavement or birdshit on a Keith Haring in Morrocco.
| Quote: |
| See, the issue here is that I do have it worked out |
This is all I could physically bring myself to read of your post so far! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
kthorjensen He brought three meals

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Predator Goose
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Location: Oversensitive Pedantic Ninny
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:29 pm |
|
|
| JamesE wrote: |
| Predator Goose wrote: |
JamesE, Eric made some remarks about what he thought art was. That didn't agree with what you thought art was, so you made fun of him. That's called juvenile.
I understand that you don't want to spend the time to respond to everyone else's ideas, but if you end up having to explain yourself anyways, wouldn't it make it faster to explain up front, and make you look like less of a dick? Or find some one liners that don't sound like personal attacks so people don't feel the need to defend themselves? |
I presented a counterpoint and a quote from two pretty well regarded artists, with the intent of it generating some kind of intelligent rebuttal or modification of the initial stance. I don't usually put that amount of effort into responding to Aderack, because he seriously seems to think he has everything worked out definitively, innocent of things like constructed arguments or citations. His response was that he'd got it all worked out in the usual (seemingly) smug, arrogant, tone, which I usually find pretty objectionable. That's why I don't respond to aderack beyond one-liners, usually. I'll spell that out now so I don't get another snotty private message.
I mean... if anyone's going to work out art it's going to be a poet or a lover or a fighter, not a dude who gets paid to write long, citation and fact-check light rambling essays on Dr Who and jRPG installments, don't you think? The Livejournal he writes for his cat is utterly amazing art though, and I swear to christ I mean that when I say it.
(I'm serious about the Catjournal, Eric) |
Yeah JamesE, sorry about that, I missed the snippiness of his second comment. Probably because I don't like Merchant of Venice, so I was willing to dismiss it as well, which I shouldn't have been. I still think you took things too far too quick, but since you were somewhat justified you still came off as less of a dick than I. _________________ I can no longer shop happily. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:34 pm |
|
|
For that matter, why do you take such interest in my hobbies? In my life? Why do you keep injecting them into your torrents against me? If you dislike me so much, why do you seem to deliberately seek out what I've written, wherever I've written it, specifically to later complain about? It's just plain odd.
I've already said that I don't have any particular problem with you, other than your continuous antagonism toward me. I'm just not particularly concerned with you; you yell at me, I go find something else to pay attention to. I admit perhaps I dismiss you too readily, and it's probably not to my credit that I neither feel nor display much respect or empathy for you. Again, though, I'm not sure what's expected of me here.
Just what is your problem, anyway? What's wrong with you? There's something deep and festering and angry in there, beyond anybody's reach. What, am I supposed to appeal to it? Am I supposed to break through your irascible armor to find and cherish the real you? Am I supposed to reciprocate your interest in me? Am I supposed to psychoanalyze you? Ignore you? I sure don't know the proper response -- so tell me, what do you want from me?
Last edited by aderack on Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:36 pm |
|
|
| JamesE wrote: |
| Objectively, it is matter shaped to the whims of a man who died in 1990 which was covered with bird shit in Morrocco. Subjectively it is whatever the hell anyone wants it to be. |
And, you know, that's pretty much exactly what I was saying. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:47 pm |
|
|
| Thanks for the cat thing, though. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
icycalm banned
Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:20 pm |
|
|
This is a really depressing thread.
Man, I sure do miss the days when real gamers read CVG and EGM, and played real games on real consoles, and no one worried about all this art nonsense.
But if people absolutely must discuss this, then I agree that a sticky thread right up top "DISCUSS VIDEOGAMES AS ART in HERE" would solve the problem.
Eventually, when that thread reached like 50 pages, it would die and put an end to all this.
And then of course we'd need another sticky thread in the general forum, devoted to personal antagonism between forum members. That'd be a neat thing do to, in my opinion. It would put an end to all the other nonsense.
also, sup eric-jon |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:41 pm |
|
|
Hey.
Yeah, this kind of sucks. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
John Mc. actually plays videogames
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: SPACE.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:46 pm |
|
|
guys nanobreaker is art.
or is this a thread about good art?
why does anyone care? if you find games rewarding, then fuck some art snob breaking into and slashing at your conceptions!
games can be art, but i'd rather they weren't. a vast bit of "art" is, simply put, boring. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dracko a sapphist fool

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:59 pm |
|
|
radiohead sux
Seriously though, Radiohead are pretentious, worthless queefs and the most offensive thing to happen to popular music in decades. It doesn't help that they basically tore the balls out of British music, the effects of which still resonate today.
I'd rather listen, nay, "analyse", to bumpin' 'n' grindin' shake yo' booty music.
Also, ew, The Watchmen. Alan Moore did a Hell of a lot better, even for the detestable teen-fantasy superhero genre. The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, for one.
P.S. Evangelion and Stand Alone Complex are fine animes, okay. _________________
      |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Adilegian Rogue Scholar

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Q*Bert Killscreen Nightmare
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:13 pm |
|
|
| John Mc. wrote: |
| why does anyone care? if you find games rewarding, then fuck some art snob breaking into and slashing at your conceptions! |
Some people make art--its experience, cultivation, patronage, and creation--the core of their lives. Not everyone's asking (or answering) questions about the art-status of videogames from the perspective of a player-critic. We're pretty interested to discover how the medium relates to everything else we love. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Predator Goose
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Location: Oversensitive Pedantic Ninny
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:50 pm |
|
|
Sorry, this isn't on topic, I just wanted to correct something that I said earlier in the thread. I said that the last high water mark for comics was in 1986~7 for Batman:Dark Night Returns. I'd just like to push that date forward two years to 1989 for The Crow. _________________ I can no longer shop happily. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Focus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:56 pm |
|
|
| JamesE wrote: |
| Focus wrote: |
| Focus wrote: |
Hey guys I made a doodie.
 |
|
|
_________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|