|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Panoptic

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:38 pm |
|
|
Dead pixels are typically caused by bad transistors in the processor controlling the liquid crystal array, not the screen itself, so I can't see why they'd develop dead pixels over time unless the IC is overheating (or the transistors are just... breaking, I guess). In fact, none of the LCD's I've personally owned have had, or developed dead pixels. My current desktop LCD is four years old and I've got a handful of LCD's considerably older than that. I run my brightness at about 30%, and the lamp is still just as, if not brighter than any new LCD I set next to it as well. Plus, LED-backlit displays will pretty much get rid of the lamp issues.
On plasmas... I've only owned a plasma for half a year, so I can't make any personal judgements, but everything I've read seems to show that gas leakage is pretty much non-issue, and current technology has the half-life rating at 30,000 and even 60,000 hours. In fact, I've read recently that Panasonic plasmas are the most reliable TV's you can currently buy (more so than DLP/LCoS/whatever).
| Quote: |
| One practical example I will cite here is the Panasonic Tau units being used by video rental company, In Motion Pictures at major airports around the country. Most of the earlier Tau models have now been replaced by a newer model, but these plasma displays were used for 5 years and were the first generation of plasma displays to go a considerable distance. In Motion displays images on them from 6AM until 10PM daily (16 hours). By my estimates, these early plasma displays by Panasonic were in use by In Motion for around 30,000 hours or more. They never fail to catch my eye as I pass by in one airport or another to see if they are still in use. If they have lost some of their brightness level its hard to tell. This use equates to 18 years for a home owner that watches 3 hours television per day. |
Source
I agree they don't build them like they used to, but the "My TV died after three years" horror stories aren't the norm, 'far as I can tell. |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
 |
Panoptic

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:37 pm |
|
|
I build computers both at work and as a hobby and maybe one in fifty monitors I get has a dead or stuck pixel. QC may vary between manufacturers, but I don't think any major manufacturers have many issues delivering a defect-free screen nowadays. Plus, when it comes to displaying a computer desktop, I always run 1:1, so spotting a single dead pixel is no harder than a group of them when going through calibration. As far as the controller ICs dying over time, I can't imagine that could be attributed to anything other than poor design or thermal management.
...and I meant burnt gas and/or other defects when I mentioned the half-life figures. Current plasmas are rated to lose half of their brightness after 60,000 hours. If you're not putting static images on the screen or running it eye-searingly bright, a well-built unit should have no problems lasting a decade. |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
 |
Panoptic

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:31 pm |
|
|
| Quote: |
Dark Dot Defects
A dark dot defect [4] is usually caused by a transistor in the transparent electrode layer that is stuck "on." It continuously runs a charge across the liquid crystal material, so no light ever passes through to the RGB layer. |
| Quote: |
Stuck Sub-Pixels
A stuck sub-pixel [8] is a pixel that is always "on." This is usually caused by a transistor that is not getting any power, and is therefore continuously allowing light at that point to pass through to the RGB layer. |
Source |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|