|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
skelethulu

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: OAKLAND
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:30 am |
|
|
| Pat the Great wrote: |
I actually have a CE coming in the mail, but I'm just gonna resell it. Decided I don't care about the stuff it comes with. |
Did the same thing here, and I have the CE already up on ebay. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Kappuru forum bishonen

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:04 am |
|
|
Ok, I'm in a tournament the day after tomorrow and need a bit of practice. I'm up for some games tomorrow night if SBers want to oblige. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
oh my god immaculate banned
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:50 am |
|
|
| okay |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
skelethulu

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: OAKLAND
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:43 pm |
|
|
Really hate this game so far! Mostly because all I can do with it while battle net is down is watch the opening cinematic and change the options. Can't even play as a guest! "To enable offline play, connect to Battle.net to authorize your game client blah blah blah" it says. So the 1 hour I'm able to play today is lost thanks to their dumb ass system. I'll go see if somebody has cracked this now. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
another god
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:59 pm |
|
|
| My b.net account is rrazcueta hat gmail and my game name is sigurd. Anyone want to get in some games? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:11 pm |
|
|
| so maybe this was established elsewhere, but is it true that you can install/play this game on any computer than can run WoW? because i'd really like to pick this up, but don't have the money to drop on an entirely new PC right now. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Loki Laufeyson fps fragmaster

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Beneath the Mushroom Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:14 pm |
|
|
| skelethulu wrote: |
| Really hate this game so far! Mostly because all I can do with it while battle net is down is watch the opening cinematic and change the options. Can't even play as a guest! "To enable offline play, connect to Battle.net to authorize your game client blah blah blah" it says. So the 1 hour I'm able to play today is lost thanks to their dumb ass system. I'll go see if somebody has cracked this now. |
companies are still doing this, and people are still buying their games? amazing. _________________
http://lunaticobscurity.blogspot.com/ - newest post: Snezhaja Koroleva (Arcade)
http://lunargarbagehell.blogspot.com/ - newest post: Batman: Digital Justice |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:15 pm |
|
|
| Isfet wrote: |
| so maybe this was established elsewhere, but is it true that you can install/play this game on any computer than can run WoW? because i'd really like to pick this up, but don't have the money to drop on an entirely new PC right now. |
I'd like to say yes, but my computer can run WoW. It can't run this though. Need at least a 256MB graphics card, but I think 512 is really required. That was the major stumbling block for mine, I think/hope. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:20 pm |
|
|
| hmmm. ok then, i guess i'll just have to go with my original plan then and ask a friend who has the game to come over and try to install it here. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
skelethulu

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: OAKLAND
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:24 pm |
|
|
| Loki Laufeyson wrote: |
| skelethulu wrote: |
| Really hate this game so far! Mostly because all I can do with it while battle net is down is watch the opening cinematic and change the options. Can't even play as a guest! "To enable offline play, connect to Battle.net to authorize your game client blah blah blah" it says. So the 1 hour I'm able to play today is lost thanks to their dumb ass system. I'll go see if somebody has cracked this now. |
companies are still doing this, and people are still buying their games? amazing. |
Yeah, this is the first time I've bought a game that pulled this. Didn't expect it! FORTUNATELY you can still play single-player once you have logged in once, it just happened that battlenet was down for 2 hours while I was trying to log in for the first time. Cracked it and got to play, not sure if I can keep my save. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
another god
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:41 pm |
|
|
| Isfet wrote: |
| hmmm. ok then, i guess i'll just have to go with my original plan then and ask a friend who has the game to come over and try to install it here. |
Anyone who bought a retail copy has guest passes. Passes are pretty much 7 hr demos. Blizzard is going to make so much money.
Edit: I bought digital download. Someone else should PM Isfet a Guest Pass though. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
parker a wolf adventuring

Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: suplex city
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:30 pm |
|
|
| negativedge wrote: |
| WHY HELLO PARK PLZ POST IN STARCRAFT THREAD THAT MY REAL (FAKE) ID INFOZ IS NEGATIVEDGE99@YAHOO.COM AND I SUCK AT STARCRAFT BUT I WANT TO PLAY WITH SB PPL KTHNX |
I thought his steam account had been hacked again and was sending out gibberish but I guess it's him. Well, there it is. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
firenze

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Bonus Round
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:14 pm |
|
|
| Talbain wrote: |
| Isfet wrote: |
| so maybe this was established elsewhere, but is it true that you can install/play this game on any computer than can run WoW? because i'd really like to pick this up, but don't have the money to drop on an entirely new PC right now. |
I'd like to say yes, but my computer can run WoW. It can't run this though. Need at least a 256MB graphics card, but I think 512 is really required. That was the major stumbling block for mine, I think/hope. |
I can run SC2, and I'm using a 2 year old notebook with a Mobility Radeon 3200 (one of the better notebook integrated video cards you could get for gaming in 2008, but still that's not saying a ton), 2.10 GHz AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 CPU, and 3GB RAM.
I can't run max settings, but it runs really smooth on medium-ish settings in fullscreen. I'll be upgrading around the end of the year to something where I can crank everything up, but it's very playable on my machine.
| another god wrote: |
| Isfet wrote: |
| hmmm. ok then, i guess i'll just have to go with my original plan then and ask a friend who has the game to come over and try to install it here. |
Anyone who bought a retail copy has guest passes. Passes are pretty much 7 hr demos. Blizzard is going to make so much money.
Edit: I bought digital download. Someone else should PM Isfet a Guest Pass though. |
Oh. I have two of those Guest Passes. Isfet, want one? Anyone else? Post here if you want em and I'll PM you later when I'm at home with the code.
The new Battle.net thing with game client downloads is actually pretty nice. Register once, and you can re-download the authorized client in the future even if you don't have your discs or reg key. Works for SC2 and WoW (and Diablo III listed already), and the "Classic Games" supported are SC/Brood War, WC3/Frozen Throne, and Diablo 2/LoD. It's nice for re-installs too, since you get the current version installed straight away without having to install from disc and then patch. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:26 am |
|
|
Mine's actually not as old as that, and has a dedicated graphics card. It's just that it's a shit graphics card (8400M GS - it's a Dell line that only had one run due to basically being a total pos). =( Get really, REALLY bad lag. Frameskipping like mad. But I guess I'm surprised? I dunno, maybe I did something wrong... will check out later. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:22 am |
|
|
So I downloaded a copy and messed around with it for an hour or so this evening. First impression: stating the obvious here, but overall, very strong sense that this is the same game I played a decade ago. I actually only had vague memories of the Starcraft by this point, but this brought them all back to me. In campaign mode, the first mission is a tactical walkaround with a fixed number of units, and the second is destroying a large/established but strangely unaggressive enemy base sending small waves at you when it feels like. Then, I tried fake-multiplayer against an AI to start learning the ropes, and it's the same micromanagy experience with the two little resource counters increasing in the corner and most things are idle until you click on them. Well, since I usually prefer to revisit genres containing a game I'd already mastered (in this case, Warcraft II) only when some fundamentally fresh element has been added to the experience, probably this wasn't the best purchase for me. (Anyone have any suggestions for very different-feeling RTSes, by the way?)
It mostly reminds me of the reason why I stopped playing RTSes way back when. I tend to be acutely aware of every moment I waste thinking about my next move as opposed to clicking on things -- precious seconds that the unseen foe is using to get ahead of me. And I go through all these little self-recriminations as I notice that I left that barracks idle, that I left resources accumulate without spending them, that I forgot to send that unit scouting, etc. So most of the game is covered by a miasma of low-grade stress and guilt. It's really this that saps my enjoyment of the game, personally, not the sandcastle-destroying stuff haze was talking about (I'm fine with that -- I'm a born rusher). And it seems like I'd have to improve to a very high level of micromanagement smoothness before I stopped feeling like this. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:28 am |
|
|
Broco this is probably the millionth time I've mentioned them in this thread but try the Total War games (Rome at the earliest, don't go before that). Of course the campaign has a whole 4x overlay, but the battles themselves are pure RTS, no resource management, and they're much more about terrain, formation and tactical maneuver rather than pure micro. Online play is just the straight RTS part, so if you're looking for straight competition that's where you might want to go. _________________ Let's Play, starring me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
geinou

Joined: 07 Apr 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:05 pm |
|
|
| Ok, finally got my copy. I'm afraid of installing it. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Mechanical ontological terrorist

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Scare Room 99
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:35 pm |
|
|
The RPS chatter has got me wanting to play this just for the singleplayer. Sounds like a lot of fun. _________________
| internisus wrote: |
| You are a pretty fucked up guy. |
True Doom Murder Junkies - Updated On Occasion |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:12 pm |
|
|
| Talbain wrote: |
| Mine's actually not as old as that, and has a dedicated graphics card. It's just that it's a shit graphics card (8400M GS - it's a Dell line that only had one run due to basically being a total pos). =( Get really, REALLY bad lag. Frameskipping like mad. But I guess I'm surprised? I dunno, maybe I did something wrong... will check out later. |
i'd check for updated drivers (my laptop has a 8600M GT, and a driver update sent my framerate in L4D2 up a couple of notches), and, baring that, running the game at the lowest possible resolution where jaggies aren't stabbing your eyes. otherwise, uh... well, motivation for a new build, i guess! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
geinou

Joined: 07 Apr 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:34 pm |
|
|
After playing some games, I got reminded why I'm not a very good RTS player. Even the CPU on normal builds an whole army in 5 minutes. In 5 minutes, I only have like 3 Space Marines.
Will probably only play the campaign and hope the CPU isn't kicking my butt there... |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
skelethulu

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: OAKLAND
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:48 pm |
|
|
geinou I'd suggest you also play the challenge maps once you finish / get bored with the campaign! They are probably my single favorite thing in here, and they can actually help a little as training for the admittedly difficult to enter multiplayer. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Maztorre

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:06 pm |
|
|
The campaign is fantastic. Each of the missions I've played so far have centred around huge stage-spanning gimmicks, or require deft use of small specialised combat units. Best comparison I can make is that the missions are the cream of what the early C&C games were doing with commando and spy missions etc, but without the filler to round out the mission count. If you enjoyed those games you'll have a lot to like in the campaign.
The writing for the cutscenes is hilaribad. I wish I kept a tally for the amount of times I quoted Raynor/the Protoss' dialogue before they actually said it. I find it somewhat endearing, if only because the actual reading of the lines is of extremely high quality. Everyone in the StarCraft universe is dedicated to helping their bros deliver bad-ass one-liners at all times. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
geinou

Joined: 07 Apr 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:17 pm |
|
|
| skelethulu wrote: |
| geinou I'd suggest you also play the challenge maps once you finish / get bored with the campaign! They are probably my single favorite thing in here, and they can actually help a little as training for the admittedly difficult to enter multiplayer. |
I did play the first challenge and I actually liked it. Had my problems at the beginning, (even with the hints, don't laugh) but it was fun |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Pat the Great

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:21 pm |
|
|
It's time to kick this revolution into overdrive. _________________ -pat m.
twitter |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:09 pm |
|
|
| do the guess passes only give access to the MP game, or to the campaign too? i'm on the fence, but i'd rather not grab one if i'm going to spend my time out in the matchmaking wilderness. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
geinou

Joined: 07 Apr 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:42 pm |
|
|
| Well, the passes in my box don't say something about MP only, yet, you can only play for 7 hours (or 14 days) with one guest pass (according to the text on the pass). So, I guess it's MP only, probably with the option to play against the AI. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
evnvnv hapax legomenon

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: the los angeles
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:57 pm |
|
|
oh star craft... does anyone have a spare guest pass they are willing to part with? really curious about how this will run on my laptop...i will surely get my butt whipped in multiplayer for all time, but the single player campaign does look pretty interesting! PM me if you want to do your good deed for the day :) _________________ The text will not live forever. The cup are small |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
another god
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:57 pm |
|
|
This game!
There's so much to it. Anyone find a place with good Pro replays? _________________ interdimensional |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
firenze

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Bonus Round
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:23 pm |
|
|
| Maztorre wrote: |
| Everyone in the StarCraft universe is dedicated to helping their bros deliver bad-ass one-liners at all times. |
selectbutton.net: everyone is dedicated to helping their bros deliver bad-ass one-liners at all times. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Pat the Great

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:02 pm |
|
|
| another god wrote: |
This game!
There's so much to it. Anyone find a place with good Pro replays? |
I like the HDstarcraft and HuskyStarcraft Youtube channels, personally. They can get a little annoying at times, though.
Also, guest pass = free campaign mode forever? http://diablo3x.com/starcraft-2-campaign-unlimited-play-as-guest/ _________________ -pat m.
twitter |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
DJ Shaman Analyst

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:46 pm |
|
|
Just picked this up. deusjester at thegeemails dot com if you wanna add my RealID thinger (just tell me who you are in the message). _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:41 am |
|
|
esserius at gmail dot com add me! _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
geinou

Joined: 07 Apr 2010
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:44 am |
|
|
| Hey, I did play multiplayer and I did win a couple of games. I kinda like it. Who would have thought that? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
internisus shafer sephiroth
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:07 am |
|
|
Hullo! Eurogamer posted a story today about overheating caused by SC2's process for rendering stuff. Basically (and basic is all I can understand), it seems that, if your video card is not kept busy making things fancy, then it will try and draw frames faster and faster until time and space fold into one another and your computer buckles into a singularity.
I have a GT 9600, 2GB RAM, and an E6550 Core2Duo; would anyone happen to have an opinion as to whether I would be able to run this game well? I'm a little distressed because Blizzard's response to the problem did not mention that they would be patching it away.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/starcraft-ii-is-melting-graphics-cards |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
skelethulu

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: OAKLAND
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:25 am |
|
|
I was experiencing the overheating! If you set those framerate limiters your system will run fine without overheating. This also could have been fixed (well, worked around without modifying some obscure txt file) if the vsync option actually enabled vsync for the front end and cutscenes. So for me I would overheat if I sat in the menus for like 15 minutes or hung out on the bridge for a while.
Seems to me like your system would run this game at High or just under High settings (mostly depending on whether you have 512MB or more on that graphics card). _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
XORDYH

Joined: 01 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:00 am |
|
|
| Misplaced blame. The hardware should throttle itself if it reaches out-of-spec operating temperatures, which most modern hardware already does. Lack of frame-rate limiters in games used to be the rule rather than the exception. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:24 am |
|
|
Tycho's comments on Starcraft II are unusually apt:
| http://www.penny-arcade.com/2010/8/2/ wrote: |
It's very difficult not to be tantalized (read: manipulated) by the presentation of this software, and I've chosen to be manipulated for my own entertainment, enjoyment, and return on investment, but that is is a matter quite apart from being ignorant of the gulf between Starcraft II and what constitutes the state of the art.
Again: you can't not like it. I'm not an absolute jerk. They've leveraged the oldest verbs of RTS to give us a highly calculated, almost algorithmically "satisfying" form of amusement. But to the extent that the game is different - outside of the Wing Commander cribbing and the rancid script - those differences are beyond my level of play.
Warcraft III was, by comparison, chockablock with innovations and crazy bullshit - the sort of prayerful long pass that a company with Blizzard's talent and resources can bring to fruition. I don't know who else is supposed to take these chances. Beyond its narrative strengths, which were manifold, its technological and philosophical bones gave rise to Defense of the Ancients, which I've argued constitutes an entirely new genre. It was a game so bold that it contained games within it. Where is that bold heart?
For the consumer, maybe "polish" is - as an ideal - the highest calling of the medium. I'm not satisfied with that. At our best we advocate with our selections, curating it thereby. In that spirit, let us be clear with one another. We may call Starcraft II "old school," the electronic equivalent of comfort food, and these things are not untrue in the particulars. But there is a safety in thought and deed here that borders on cowardice. |
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
another god
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:02 pm |
|
|
It's not just polish. That's fucking ridiculous. _________________ interdimensional |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Talbain

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:45 pm |
|
|
My review. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
haze la belle poney sans merci
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 12:02 am |
|
|
wait, warcraft III was innovative?
because a couple fans created tower defense and dota in the map editor? both of which existed first in SC1 anyway |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:43 am |
|
|
well, even if it didn't do the whole action-RPG/RTS thing first, it did it pretty well, and was a pretty radical shift from what a lot of RTSes were at the time (including SC and WCII)
when he says it's just polish, he's probably going after how, between the two games, we've gotten both of the Myth games, every Relic RTS and every Total War game. it is a lot of innovation between the two games, but i'm willing to file this under "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" (this is kinda Blizzard's M.O. anyways) |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|