|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:54 pm Post subject: video compression question |
|
|
hello lol
we did a beauuuuuutiful FFDog over here
and it's 1.1 GB
is there some kind of magical thing i can do to decrease the size to something reasonable? _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
newave

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:42 pm |
|
|
Mac or PC?
If mac ARRR quicktime pro (or use final cut or somehting) and file/export - Movie to Quicktime Movie. CHoose options:
Video Settings:
Compression - H.264
Dimensions - 320x240
Sound:
Format: AAC
Sample Rate: 44.1
Bit Rate: 128 kbps |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:14 pm |
|
|
| on windows, the red kawa stuff (wii/psp/ps3 video converter) really isn't so bad at all considering it's free and you can change the settings within reason, and of course divx it. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
oligophagy

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:32 pm |
|
|
| The ffmpegX mac frontend to, uh, ffmpeg and a dozen so other open source A/V tools is nice and free except for like two features you don't need. The documentation is good, or just plug in newave's settings. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
gooktime

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: no
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:36 pm |
|
|
| Also, if you want to make something suitable for iPod/portable resolutions, try iSquint. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Hot Stott Bot banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:03 pm |
|
|
As the man pointed out earlier, H.264 with AAC is what you want.
That's pretty much as good as it gets.
So, aside from using H.264, if you really want to get it lower... you could convert the frame rate to something lower with blending and whatnot... you could interlace it... you could lower the resolution... free tools (VirtualDub yay!) will do all of that for you with the highest quality.
Once you've done that, then compress it.
Converting to H.264 is kind of a mess these days. QuickTime Pro is really the easiest way to do it, quite honestly, but there are free tools out there too... |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:24 am |
|
|
| newave wrote: |
Mac or PC?
If mac ARRR quicktime pro (or use final cut or somehting) and file/export - Movie to Quicktime Movie. CHoose options:
Video Settings:
Compression - H.264
Dimensions - 320x240
Sound:
Format: AAC
Sample Rate: 44.1
Bit Rate: 128 kbps |
Yeah, I'm using teh a Mac and I don't have Quicktime Pro, though I keep thinking of getting it. My video, as-is, is an MPG. And it's just one video. And it's an hour.
Maybe I'll break this shit out when I get home.
I basically want it to be downloadable and watchable on the PCs and Macs of gorgeous kids everywhere.
Maybe I should just host it uncompressed and offer the URL only to people who email asking for it. Or accept PayPal donations again.
moooooooooney
"PROJECT FFDOG BOY IN OBLIVION WORLD: ADMISSION: $1" _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BotageL pretty anime princess

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: *fidget*
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:34 am |
|
|
Don't use Quicktime. Quicktime fucking sucks on Windows. Use Xvid or something. _________________
http://www.mdgeist.com/ |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:00 am |
|
|
yeah i don't have windoze though _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Hot Stott Bot banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:01 am |
|
|
No.
XviD is a mediocre format compared to H.264.
Use H.264.
QuickTime Pro is a piece of software that can convert video to H.264.
It does a fine job at it.
Using some free software to convert to H.264 wouldn't be any different than using QuickTime Pro to do it -- except the latter would be simpler. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
oligophagy

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:41 am |
|
|
ffmpegX
isn't difficult. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Hot Stott Bot banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:55 am |
|
|
Last I tried ffmpegX I remember it being a big pain in the ass.
Mainly, I remember having to install lots of other software and point ffmpegX to all of it and finding that a little annoying. Though that was a long time ago and I haven't had a chance to use it since...
...still nicer than all the windows solutions I suppose.
I dunno, might be nicer now! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
oligophagy

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:43 am |
|
|
| Yeah, the installation is a little weird because license technicalities break it up, but it's only two pieces you need to download. That's not a big number! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BotageL pretty anime princess

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: *fidget*
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:04 am |
|
|
H.264 is nice and all but fuck why would you wrap it in that Quicktime shit? I can play H.264 files that aren't in a Fucking Quicktime container but the moment that .mov gets involved that fucker Quicktime takes over and can't keep the frame rate up at 30fps in a 640x480 video on my 2.4ghz machine. _________________
http://www.mdgeist.com/ |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Hot Stott Bot banned
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:05 am |
|
|
| Yeah, that's why you would select the option to save it an MPEG-4 container instead. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BotageL pretty anime princess

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: *fidget*
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:56 am |
|
|
I think that's a solution everyone can agree with. _________________
http://www.mdgeist.com/ |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
psiga saudade

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:42 am |
|
|
google video allows long movie uploads, doesn't it? _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Corinth thatbox

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:32 pm |
|
|
| BotageL wrote: |
| H.264 is nice and all but fuck why would you wrap it in that Quicktime shit? I can play H.264 files that aren't in a Fucking Quicktime container but the moment that .mov gets involved that fucker Quicktime takes over and can't keep the frame rate up at 30fps in a 640x480 video on my 2.4ghz machine. |
Legato what the fuck is wrong with your computer :(
On Windows VDub probably isn't the best thing for H.264 encoding, because it only uses VFW codecs and the latest H.264 VFW codec is like a year or two old. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
BotageL pretty anime princess

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: *fidget*
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:47 pm |
|
|
Seriously, man, Quicktime is fucking terrible on Windows, because Apple really doesn't care. What is wrong with my computer, from their perspective, is it's not a Mac running Mac OS X 10.Newest. _________________
http://www.mdgeist.com/ |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
psiga saudade

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:55 pm |
|
|
The quicktime implementation on Windows has never been good. It's still not good, though at least less horrible than five years ago or whatever.
Still, something h.264 is good. If you can make it an AVI, that would be spiffy. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|