|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:31 am |
|
|
| MattCD42 wrote: |
| I'm not feeling the narrator here, I just kinda wish they'd let the characters speak for themselves, or honestly, just don't have the narrator speak their lines and just let you read them. Either would be stronger in my mind. |
just turn off subtitles and turn the narrator voice to 0 in town and then he is gone.
or get the dwarf to narrate because heck yeah. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:38 am |
|
|
man, I like the idea of the narrator, it accentuates the feeling of this being The Most Important Tabletop Session Ever _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
another god
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:06 am |
|
|
Protip: Up on the Left Stick (or dpad if you're weird and didn't change your controls) plus one of the face buttons is a quick select for your items. I currently have heal on Up + Tri and my magic ring on Up + Square. _________________ interdimensional |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
rye
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:21 am |
|
|
Not a fan of the default narrator's voice either, but try one of the other characters before you turn it off.
The art assets are impressive, but sometimes their incredible attention to detail makes me wish some other parts of the game had received the same level of polish. #vanillawaregames
Totally agree with BotageL that the item shortcut should have been assigned to a shoulder button, or at least have the option in key-config. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
MattCD42

Joined: 13 Sep 2011 Location: Under the rock
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:57 am |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
| MattCD42 wrote: |
| I'm not feeling the narrator here, I just kinda wish they'd let the characters speak for themselves, or honestly, just don't have the narrator speak their lines and just let you read them. Either would be stronger in my mind. |
just turn off subtitles and turn the narrator voice to 0 in town and then he is gone.
or get the dwarf to narrate because heck yeah. |
I should try the dwarf, but also that first one is fairly creative, thanks! _________________ Steam: Godamn_Milkman |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:02 pm |
|
|
the last boss is more or less the Red Dragon/Synn from the D&D games, except several times less frustrating, and also gives you a ton of S loots. then the game turns around and gives you a story reason for the higher difficulties (which most importantly means the story doesn't reset and you can go right on playing online) and unlocks an infinite tower stage
Rune words are fun, by the way. activated The True Fist before a boss then boxed it to death doing 1k damage a punch (because Dwarves) _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:35 pm |
|
|
i gotta be honest guys; i really want this game, because i like Vanillaware and i like D&D arcade games, but the pervy "homages" in the game are kind of making it difficult for me to buy (molesting enslaved women being more of an issue than simply the way the characters look).
guess i might wait for a price drop or to buy it used? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:43 pm |
|
|
in all fairness, the molestation only happens if you do it, thus reflecting the terrible nature of the player back onto themselves
or if you're online, in which case it's a little funny/disturbing seeing 2-3 hands dart to grope mostly unanimated portraits
the flavor text for the mermaid's breasts was funny in its shamelessness (she lost her bra escaping from pirates, we swear) _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:13 pm |
|
|
i wonder if that bit is in the original or was added by translators? either way, yeah, i do pick up the vague notion that a lot of this stuff is done with its tongue firmly planted in cheek (as opposed to numerous other games where it's the reason to play), but i feel like, at this moment in games, i/we/consumers/thinkers have some interesting choices to make about what i choose to spend money on and what that is potentially encouraging.
anyway, i don't want to totally derail the thread from talking about the gameplay itself, but i've actually been having an internal struggle about what to do since the game was released, and this is pretty much the only place where i feel like i could vent these thoughts.
there's always been elements of this stuff in Vanillaware games, but a) i was younger and didn't really take myself to task over my ideologies and how things i played may contradict those ideologies and b) the forcible touching aspect takes it a step further beyond male gazey stuff like the princess in Muramasa holding her towel in such a way that you will catch a glimmer of her butt cheeks as she walks.
anyyyway, we'll see. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:24 pm |
|
|
I can respect that line of thinking. While I find the some of the portrayals to be problematic, I'm liking the game enough that it's just a flaw rather than a huge detriment to the meat of the product. Mostly, I'm just bummed that all of the beat em ups this year (aside from the D&D pack) seem to have something.... off. Like, I'll probably get Senran Kagura, and that is more "Ugh" than DC could ever hope to achieve and Phantom Breaker (which only I bought) is moe as fuck.
the baseline here is that I'm not ashamed of DC enough to want to hide it, which I can't say of some other games _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:25 pm |
|
|
I bought Deathsmiles and had that faceplate on my Xbox for the longest time, till it broke, so I clearly just have no shame about the stuff.
EDIT: Obviously not true, but I dunno, I just don't worry about it I guess? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Pijaibros

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Casino Night Zone
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:09 pm |
|
|
| Isfet wrote: |
| i gotta be honest guys; i really want this game, because i like Vanillaware and i like D&D arcade games, but the pervy "homages" in the game are kind of making it difficult for me to buy. |
i swear this generation of grown-ups are more conservative than their grandfathers nowadays.
it's really weird hearing so many people be apologetic about this thing while nobody ever apologizes for how things are in other media.
this is the most fun i've had hitting buttons on a while from a modern game. really i do not care how good or bad a game looks as long as i enjoy hitting buttons and making things happen. even the people in my circle (of all bends and colors) enjoy this, so i don't understand why "professional reviewers" are acting so apologetic for everyone. seems nobody can enjoy just hitting buttons and making cool things happen on screen anymore. _________________

Last edited by Pijaibros on Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
nothingxs various methods of escape

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Miami, FL
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
SuperWes

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: St. Louis, Missouri
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:12 pm |
|
|
Serious question:
What makes Tomb Raider 2013 unacceptable, but Dragon's Crown ok?
-Wes _________________
  |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
nothingxs various methods of escape

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Miami, FL
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:17 pm |
|
|
tomb raider 2013 is unacceptable? i mean the main female characters in both games have agency and are strong women
i think DC is probably worse about it with all the omg captured girlzzz women so weak swoon swoon shit going on
i pretty much just go "yep thats an old fantasy trope" and move on
the thing that i laugh about the most is that the only male character that might actually be attractive to women is the wizard and i feel he doesn't get played anywhere as much as the sorceress _________________ select button
i've gotta let go. i've gotta get straight. why'd you have to make it so hard? let me get away.
3DSFC 1736-1476-0518 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:17 pm |
|
|
| SuperWes wrote: |
Serious question:
What makes Tomb Raider 2013 unacceptable, but Dragon's Crown ok?
-Wes |
Ugh don't do this, please. This is not a serious question at all. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:24 pm |
|
|
| Pijaibros wrote: |
| Isfet wrote: |
| i gotta be honest guys; i really want this game, because i like Vanillaware and i like D&D arcade games, but the pervy "homages" in the game are kind of making it difficult for me to buy. |
i swear this generation of grown-ups are more conservative than their grandfathers nowadays.
it's really weird hearing so many people be apologetic about this thing while nobody ever apologizes for how things are in other media.
this is the most fun i've had hitting buttons on a while from a modern game. really i do not care how good or bad a game looks as long as i enjoy hitting buttons and making things happen. even the people in my circle (of all bends and colors) enjoy this, so i don't understand why "professional reviewers" are acting so apologetic for everyone. seems nobody can enjoy just hitting buttons and making cool things happen on screen anymore. |
first of all, i don't think that my lack of desire to play a game where it's possible to sexually assault virtual people makes me "conservative." it just means i think that's kind of gross and immature and reinforces weird gender roles. it's like, "hey check out this hot chick! she's not wearing a lot of clothes! you totally wanna grab her tits, don't you, bro? don't worry; we got you covered ^_- no one can stop you! she's all chained up and shit! plus, she makes little sexual moans when you do it, so you know she's into it."
and yeah, i dunno; maybe my grandfather wouldn't have had an issue with that, but i think that's more a sign of being progressive/more sensitive to gender issues than it is my being more conservative.
second, lots of people write lots of things about similar issues in all kinds of media, so i dunno what you're talking about (article from a week or two ago re: Pacific Rim).
is it possible that some game writers might be talking about this stuff more than usual because there's added pressure to do so or it's more of a "hot issue" now than it was ten or even four years ago? possibly. but it also means that it's something people are talking about, which, in my opinion, is a good thing.
i dunno; i like hitting buttons and making cool things happen on screen, too. i just want to be able to do that without having to navigate through some backwards game developer's view of objectification. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
SuperWes

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: St. Louis, Missouri
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:51 pm |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
| SuperWes wrote: |
Serious question:
What makes Tomb Raider 2013 unacceptable, but Dragon's Crown ok?
-Wes |
Ugh don't do this, please. This is not a serious question at all. |
The thing that makes it a serious question is that I expected a thread full of how awful the game's representation of women is and all I see are sprinkles of that among a whole lot of people talking about how good the game is. Those same people loving the game seem to be the ones with the loudest voices in the threads for other games with problematic representations of women like Other M and Tomb Raider.
Is it just that it's not a AAA game that makes it ok?
-Wes _________________
  |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:02 pm |
|
|
| SuperWes wrote: |
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
| SuperWes wrote: |
Serious question:
What makes Tomb Raider 2013 unacceptable, but Dragon's Crown ok?
-Wes |
Ugh don't do this, please. This is not a serious question at all. |
The thing that makes it a serious question is that I expected a thread full of how awful the game's representation of women is and all I see are sprinkles of that among a whole lot of people talking about how good the game is. Those same people loving the game seem to be the ones with the loudest voices in the threads for other games with problematic representations of women like Other M and Tomb Raider.
Is it just that it's not a AAA game that makes it ok?
-Wes |
Hey, thanks for making it clear you are just trying to start shit. Good job contributing nothing while painting people in a broad swathe than indicates that yes, that is literally all you are trying to do.
This is why it was clearly not a serious question. There's so much wrong in the premise and phrasing (not to mention your clearly judgemental tone and such) as to make it worthless.
Also, you would do well to note that no one here is denying the troubling aspect of this game, while we had lots of people talking about how lara croft taking a wooden phallic object to the throat after being tortured was A-OK.
Last edited by boojiboy7 on Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:03 pm |
|
|
| SuperWes wrote: |
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
| SuperWes wrote: |
Serious question:
What makes Tomb Raider 2013 unacceptable, but Dragon's Crown ok?
-Wes |
Ugh don't do this, please. This is not a serious question at all. |
The thing that makes it a serious question is that I expected a thread full of how awful the game's representation of women is and all I see are sprinkles of that among a whole lot of people talking about how good the game is. Those same people loving the game seem to be the ones with the loudest voices in the threads for other games with problematic representations of women like Other M and Tomb Raider.
Is it just that it's not a AAA game that makes it ok?
-Wes |
Wes - my take on why that might have happened is that the stuff in DC is more of the run-of-the-mill sexist garbage that we see pretty much every day in literally every fucking thing from billboards to magazines to music videos to WHATEVS and it isn't trying say that it's not. the Tomb Raider issue had to do with the fact that the developers believed they were creating an empathetic female character, but did so in a way that was pretty backwards (i.e. "we want you to want to protect her"), which is like, "worse," in the sense that they thought they were being super progressive, but it's clear they don't really "get" it.
now, i never played TR2013, so i have no idea how that all panned out in the long run. people seemed to be ok with it. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Pijaibros

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Casino Night Zone
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:19 pm |
|
|
no. tomb raider 2013 and other m are not very fun to play. this one is.
| Isfet wrote: |
| first of all, i don't think that my lack of desire to play a game where it's possible to sexually assault virtual people makes me "conservative." it just means i think that's kind of gross and immature and reinforces weird gender roles. it's like, "hey check out this hot chick! she's not wearing a lot of clothes! you totally wanna grab her tits, don't you, bro? don't worry; we got you covered ^_- no one can stop you! she's all chained up and shit! plus, she makes little sexual moans when you do it, so you know she's into it." |
i don't mind sexual things as much as i mind hyper-violence. but in america hyper-violence and tea-bagging is okay. i don't see these characters as more than the hyper-sexual extremes of boris vallejo fantasy art. it is just really weird to me that these same critics are quick to defend that violent games do not make people violent, yet in this scenario it seems that critics believe people can't seperate virtual sexual fantasy from reality. that the men who would play this are all monsters. it feels like this is the new witch hunt and a lot of people out there are trying to tell me what to think.
i will say i loathe that pose where somehow a woman can point her butt and breasts in the same direction, it just looks painful.
i wonder if this conversation would even be happening if this was not an entertaining game. didn't this same conversation happened when skullgirls was new? i can imagine the storm that would be happening if instead of gender extremes the characters were an average white guy, a powerful black guy, and a quick asian. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:46 pm |
|
|
| Pijaibros wrote: |
| i don't mind sexual things as much as i mind hyper-violence. but in america hyper-violence and tea-bagging is okay. i don't see these characters as more than the hyper-sexual extremes of boris vallejo fantasy art. it is just really weird to me that these same critics are quick to defend that violent games do not make people violent, yet in this scenario it seems that critics believe people can't seperate virtual sexual fantasy from reality. that the men who would play this are all monsters. it feels like this is the new witch hunt and a lot of people out there are trying to tell me what to think. |
ok, i don't "mind sexual things" either. i could go into a litany of evidence as to how i'm a hyper-sexual individual, but this isn't the Axe and i'm not 22 anymore, so i'll refrain and get to the point: there's a difference between something being "sexual" and something "sexist" or "gendered." i really dig Lesbian Spider Queens from Mars, but the content reflects the attitude of the designer and the intent of the game (BDSM relationships, etc.). Dragon's Crown contains stuff which is all part of the usual male power fantasy thing of saving beautiful, helpless women and then getting to play around with their jiggly parts, which, to me, is problematic or, at the very least, not something i'm interested in doing.
i don't have a problem with characters looking sexy, per se, but of course i'll question the intent and, depending on how severe the male gazeyness of it is, it might mean i won't play it. what i do have an issue with is games repeatedly following these sorts of tropes because it's unnecessary and it's boring. same deal with the new Suda51 game; you use x-ray vision to fondle the women in the game. what the hell? you want the women in the game to be attractive? ok, whatever. but why take it up a notch and basically say, flat out, "the only reason these women are here are so you can virtually play around with them." it's just fucking weird and creepy! why is it so hard not to have a view of sexuality beyond that of a 12 year old boy?
also, i'm not on the team of saying hyper violent games don't influence people's perceptions of violence. at least, not the violence exists in most games these days (Contra vs. Call of Duty, Looney Tunes vs. Zack Snyder).
also also, i was ready to buy the game in spite of the character art; my main problem stems from the rescue bits.
| Pijaibros wrote: |
| i wonder if this conversation would even be happening if this was not an entertaining game. |
maybe, but i would have ignored it if the game didn't seem like it actually played well.
i dunno; it's like the deal with gay bars boycotting Russian vodka. if Russian vodka wasn't really good vodka, it wouldn't really mean anything. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:14 pm |
|
|
| Isfet wrote: |
| i really dig Lesbian Spider Queens from Mars, but the content reflects the attitude of the designer and the intent of the game (BDSM relationships, etc.). Dragon's Crown contains stuff which is all part of the usual male power fantasy thing of saving beautiful, helpless women and then getting to play around with their jiggly parts, which, to me, is problematic or, at the very least, not something i'm interested in doing. |
So intent is what matters most? Let's not get into an authorial intent conversation, but that seems like a rough way to judge, in that you know Anna's intent (in that she said it), but how do you know Vanillaware's? The only statement of intent I have seen on this game has nothing to do with this stuff, so I dunno. Just throwing that out there.
Also, there is only one rescuing that can turn into fondling, as far as I know. There are also dudes to fondle, if you so desire, not that that is a defense, really, just more of an indicator that they wanted to make their static backgrounds interactive, and maybe didn't think through what this meant. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Isfet

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A New York
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:27 pm |
|
|
bah, no, i don't care about authorial intent in this context, i merely brought up another game that has scantily-clad ladies who end up in bondage to serve as a counterpoint.
i know you can fondle the dudes; the reactions aren't the same nor are the situations, etc., even if they were the same, this doesn't mean anything because blah blah blah the same arguments over and over again about why simply swapping dudes for women doesn't make it better.
i dunno. actually, i think i'm gonna check out of this conversation! didn't mean to try to ruin anyone's fun, was more interested in hearing thoughts of anyone who might have shared some similar concerns and, if they did, and still bought the game, how they resolved it.
in summation: video games + Japan + fantasy settings à la Heavy Metal/Frazetta = ferget it. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:20 pm |
|
|
| Isfet wrote: |
bah, no, i don't care about authorial intent in this context, i merely brought up another game that has scantily-clad ladies who end up in bondage to serve as a counterpoint.
i know you can fondle the dudes; the reactions aren't the same nor are the situations, etc., even if they were the same, this doesn't mean anything because blah blah blah the same arguments over and over again about why simply swapping dudes for women doesn't make it better. |
Oh yeah, I know the presence of men doesn't counter the presence of women; I didn't mean it that way. I just meant that the situations with the women fondling comes across less as intentional and more as "people didn't think this through" to me. Again, that is reading into intent, but still. It doesn't come off as a necessarily malicious exploitation trope, as much as fumbling exploitation of it, if that makes sense. Obviously the exploitation is still there! No doubt!
Though it is funny that as near as I remember, the game never tells people to poke the pictures. Obviously then knew people would though.
| Quote: |
i dunno. actually, i think i'm gonna check out of this conversation! didn't mean to try to ruin anyone's fun, was more interested in hearing thoughts of anyone who might have shared some similar concerns and, if they did, and still bought the game, how they resolved it.
in summation: video games + Japan + fantasy settings à la Heavy Metal/Frazetta = ferget it. |
I don't think you are ruining anyone's fun here or anything, and seem a lot more interested in conversation than Wes's baiting, so please stick around.
For me, I have jsut sorta accepted, going back to I dunno, (to pick an arbitrary point)Bridget in Guilty Gear (with stops in Deathmiles, Otomedius, Catherine) that Japanese games are going to have fucked up issues with women/gender/sexuality. I even enjoy examining them a lot and trying to figure them out, but at the same time, part of me just shrugs it off. Is it sad that I have learned to do that? sure, but as long as I don't pretend the issues aren't there, I don't feel all that horrible for it. There are lots of games/music/movies that I love that have less than desirable ethics (either form the creator or in the creation or both) that I have learned to accept and move on.
I think the blowback here is that the internet has been going crazy over this game for a month or so now and eveyrone jumping on to label this game as the WORST THING without ever actually touching it to see, and now that some of us have jumped in to see, we are finding a pretty delightful game wrapped in a sometimes troubling wrapper. So here, we thought people could just sorta take the troubling wrapper as a given, and talk about the game with that already assumed, like how I can talk about Deathsmiles without talking about moe, or some such. That being said, if you want to talk about it, let's talk! That's cool too. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
rye
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:45 pm |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
| For me, I have jsut sorta accepted, going back to I dunno, (to pick an arbitrary point)Bridget in Guilty Gear (with stops in Deathmiles, Otomedius, Catherine) that Japanese games are going to have fucked up issues with women/gender/sexuality. I even enjoy examining them a lot and trying to figure them out, but at the same time, part of me just shrugs it off. Is it sad that I have learned to do that? sure, but as long as I don't pretend the issues aren't there, I don't feel all that horrible for it. There are lots of games/music/movies that I love that have less than desirable ethics (either form the creator or in the creation or both) that I have learned to accept and move on. |
This is very much the mentality I arrived at, and was basically how I stomached Catherine. I was also living in Japan at the time, and I wonder if it in some weird way warped my tolerances for how women are objectified. I wonder what the dialogue looks like for this game on the Japanese side. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
MattCD42

Joined: 13 Sep 2011 Location: Under the rock
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:28 pm |
|
|
To throw in my asshole, er opinion, I think the difference between a game like Dragon's Crown and the new Tomb Raider:we couldn't think of a title, is really the art style. We don't care about the cartoonish violence, the absurd body types/contortions ect. because it's all drawn in a fantasy-esque way, i.e. it's very cartoony. Whereas Tomb Raider is 'realalistic' or trying to break through the uncanny valley, however you want to look at that, so the depictions can be taken more seriously because the art style suggests we're supposed to take it seriously. I think that's the biggest breaking point. I also think it's a great question. _________________ Steam: Godamn_Milkman |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JUMBO

Joined: 17 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:43 am |
|
|
Yeah, one's funny, the other's humorless. Dragon's Crown ain't putting on no airs. It's shamelessly dumb. Just look at that sorceress when she runs -- it's like someone tried to animate that old joke about Dolly Parton going jogging, and it's rendered with far greater skill than most Japanese creep-art. Her bosoms aren't quite like the gravity-defying water balloons you see in stuff like DOA or that one animated GIF I see all the fucking time where that sniper bullet flies between that schoolgirl's boobsocks. The sorceress does not look comfortable. She's fucking burdened. It's so great. It's so dumb. But it's also kinda smart, an acknowledgement of how such a body might actually move, like it was drawn by an artist who's studied more than anime and video games.
I mean, I'm overselling it here. It's still 100% creepy nerd shit but at least it's honest, and when I saw that little run animation while searching for videos of the Vita version (the framerate sucks and I wish I'd gotten it on PS3 but then I'd never play it cuz man, I never play console games nowadays) and it made me laugh so hard that it sold me on the game. So I'm also probably a creep.
I'm definitely a creep.
Though had I known about the molestation thing I wouldn't have bought this. That's pretty gross, but man, at least I can easily avoid it. The only way to avoid all that Tomb Raider torture porn is not to play. Fuckin' Shadow Complex didn't let me opt out of shooting my cheating, spying (and, if I remember correctly, unarmed!) girlfriend in the fucking head. And...I dunno, I'm pretty tired so I can't come up with a third example but pretend I put something super gross and Japanese here as an attempt to make myself seem less like the sad, sexist Japanophile I'm surely coming across as.
(It's cute when they do it.)
Anyway, I'm playing this on Vita, which doesn't have crossplay. I thought it did. There's a ton of slowdown once you get 3 or 4 fighters on screen throwing around spells. And it makes me feel like a blind old man cuz I have a hard time keeping track of where I am on that smaller screen and it all seems a bit dim. And the overabundance of loot devalues the whole upgrade system, making the post-battle stuff a bore. And unlocking basic functionality like online is obnoxious as usual. But the touchscreen is better than using a cursor! So that's a big plus in favor of the Vita version. And it is fun playing a dwarf and throwing monsters at other monsters, so I will keep playing this while watching episodes of Columbo. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
diplo

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Location: Brandy Brendo's bungalow
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:06 am |
|
|
| So, how are the musics in this? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
scratchmonkey Final Finasty

Joined: 21 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:00 am |
|
|
| JUMBO wrote: |
| Anyway, I'm playing this on Vita, which doesn't have crossplay. I thought it did. |
In the same boat here, which bums me out a bit. Can't justify buying both versions in any way shape or form though. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:42 am |
|
|
the thing no one's saying about the one, single portrait you can "molest" is that the flavor text for it is pretty much calling you a creep for doing it; your fairy companion pretty much gives a "What the fuck" look every time you touch her (in text form).
unless we're counting the shopkeeper, in which case the text implies that you aren't even doing it and she'd kill you for it anyway _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
JUMBO

Joined: 17 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:51 am |
|
|
On further inspection those sorceress tits are pretty boobsocks-y but they're still pretty funny.
I promise I'll never talk about anime boobs ever again. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:56 am |
|
|
not even about how the Amazon gets bitten on her boobs when she's grabbed by a snake
cause that's mostly funny _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
ionustron
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:59 am |
|
|
| Pijaibros wrote: |
| i wonder if this conversation would even be happening if this was not an entertaining game. didn't this same conversation happened when skullgirls was new? i can imagine the storm that would be happening if instead of gender extremes the characters were an average white guy, a powerful black guy, and a quick asian. |
When Skullgirls was first announced few years back, I tweeted something to the effect of, what's this shit I don't want porn in my videogames!! Seeing that flippant response now with DC irks me about as much as the concerns I have while accepting it. The noisiest stuff on both sides just bugs me at this point but I still haven't watched the game proper so I can't say other than my opinion sort of depends on the rest of the world built.
When Kamitani issued an apology RE: Facebook comment couple months back, I think he said something to the effect of the characters were taken to extremes because that was the only way he felt he could differentiate his fantasy style of work currently (if anything, that thought to me is more sad than whatever result.) The thing that makes me pause is in a bit of his illustration work outside of games there's a theme of anime women in very uncomfortable positions or contraptions. I'm not sure if it's an experimentation or an honest fetishism or what my interpretation is other than I don't care for it but I don't want to make fun of it either. The outcry and clickbait editorial shit calling the work being juvenile feels just as hypocritical at best.
At worst, watching Code of Princess played, that result feels way more creepy, yet the general opinion in the lead up to that game was that it was nothing more than fanservice. At least here I could hopefully choose away from the problem parts and as others said, the characters (same with Skullgirls) are crazy enough that it doesn't trip the triggers in my head mostly. But they still may be there, I haven't seen it yet.
The "I can skip this" comment I made earlier was dumb and I am going to have to see it at some point in the future unfortunately. I'm still curious if anyone bothered with DFO because that and DC sound mechanically interchangeable at this point.
----
However, I don't get grope-o-vision things that pops up in games that aren't expressly porn. Why was it needed in Policenauts or Otomedius? At least when some old arcade games did it (Forgotten Worlds? I forget exactly,) they'd outright punish you by just taking a crapload of money from you. But why put it in the first place when it tends to be one of the more intractable features for the games where it does occur? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Moogs
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:07 pm |
|
|
Not jiving with the combat this game. Feels like none of the sprites are interacting with each other so it feels off to me.
Not sure what I was expecting, but it wasn't this. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
costel

Joined: 30 Aug 2010 Location: Omsk,Florida
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:20 pm |
|
|
| Moogs wrote: |
Not jiving with the combat this game. Feels like none of the sprites are interacting with each other so it feels off to me.
Not sure what I was expecting, but it wasn't this. |
That's pretty much where I'm at right now. Muramasa felt a lot more polished in terms of it's combat. I'm easing myself into the game and trying to finally let it sink in, but I'm also having a lot of trouble finding a character class I like. It's kind of funny that there isn't any sort of a Cleric given how trope reliant and classicist Dragon's Crown is. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:41 pm |
|
|
the Sorceress is the closest thing the game has to a support class in the vein of the D&D Cleric; she trades Turn Undead for more crowd control-y spells, but she has support spells that shield other players and spawns food for healing. they seemingly took a cue from hunting games, where players have to be largely responsible for themselves (though the only penalty for dying and continuing is a fuckton of gold). _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
rye
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:47 pm |
|
|
| costel wrote: |
| Moogs wrote: |
Not jiving with the combat this game. Feels like none of the sprites are interacting with each other so it feels off to me.
Not sure what I was expecting, but it wasn't this. |
That's pretty much where I'm at right now. Muramasa felt a lot more polished in terms of it's combat. I'm easing myself into the game and trying to finally let it sink in, but I'm also having a lot of trouble finding a character class I like. It's kind of funny that there isn't any sort of a Cleric given how trope reliant and classicist Dragon's Crown is. |
I'm glad I'm not the only person feeling like this. I don't play a lot of beat'em ups, so I assumed it was just my lack of experience, but something does feel off.
The sharpness of the graphics add to the feeling that I'm playing inside a cardboard storybook. There was some ambiguity in SD that was much kinder to creating a cohesive picture. Now it feels like some of the magic is gone because I can see all the moving parts. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Rokkan

Joined: 30 Jan 2012
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:59 pm |
|
|
| theres nothing wrong with things being sexy or exploring sexuality (what sexuality is explored other than the straight cis man's sexuality in 99% of all vidcons though?). there is something really wrong when literally all of your female characters being fetichized as fuck while all of your male characters aren't treated as such. i'd like to play as a cool lady that represents me instead of representing some guy's sexual desires. there is something much wronger with mechanics that allow you to molest chained NPCs. it's uncalled for and it's fucking gross for a list of reasons. please dont portray fetishes reliant on power and domination out of a strict D/s or BDSM scenario with consent. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
scratchmonkey Final Finasty

Joined: 21 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:08 pm |
|
|
Just saw the art book as a guy at work got it. It's ah...well...super-pervy. There's really no other way to describe it.
There is a really lush two-page spread of all the food you can find in the game though. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
diplo

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Location: Brandy Brendo's bungalow
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:25 pm |
|
|
| MattCD42 wrote: |
| I think the difference is really the art style. |
That's not the difference.
(Feel free to slam me for my briefness. I'm just tired out by these discussions)
| JUMBO wrote: |
| It's still 100% creepy nerd shit but at least it's honest, |
How is this ever an "at least"? This sentiment seems meaningless. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|