|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Iacus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:53 pm Post subject: WARNING: A Next-Gen is approaching fast (PC Build thread) |
|
|
So, I decided that, with next-gen and all, this is the year to get a new desktop gaming rig/workstation.
I want to build it myself and, as opposed to my previous PC buying decisions, this time I'll try to build a high-end, reasonably top of the line machine.
I don't mind making an initial investment in the $1000-$1300 range if the thing is going to last me 7 to 10 years. That's about $185/year which is less than what I spend in videogames. Plus with a PC I always have the option to throw a bit more money at it for extra upgrades 5 years down the line.
With this said, I turn to the SBers well versed in PC hardware for counsel. I have some rough idea about what I want, but I still have a few doubts.
Desired specs are:
- Intel CPU (probably an i7 with good price/performance ratio. I don't know much about actual versions or models, but the i7-3770 looks like the sweet spot)
- 16 GB RAM (whatever is fastest at the moment. I hear RAM is cheap nowadays and 16GB is 4x what I have now, so I figure it would be enough to start)
- Nvidia GTX Card (I'm hesitant to buy the highest end model because of early adopter/overpricing syndrome, plus it will surely cause the price to skyrocket. I'd consider it if it has tangible benefits though)
- SSD for OS/Software paired with a HDD for other storage.
Possible extras:
- Video capture card (to hook up consoles and stuff for capture/streaming)
- Blu-Ray player (not at all necessary, but probably will consider it as a future upgrade)
Now, to the sticking points/questions:
SSD Size: 128 or 256 GB? The last few years I've been using a 128GB partition for software and OS, and it seems to be enough for me. I just install games and store documents/downloads in a separate partition or external storage, but if the SSD prices are reasonable, there's no harm in getting a higher capacity drive. I intend to dual boot Windows/Ubuntu on the thing, so extra room will definitely help.
Motherboard: I don't want a huge hulking box. I'm thinking more like a mid tower or even compact tower, so I'm considering ATX and even micro-ATX as mobo form factors. I think the main problem with smaller form factors will be to get a video card that fits while being powerful enough, but there are probably heating/expandability issues as well if I use a chassis that's too small.
PSU placement/power. I have no idea how to buy a suitable PSU. I guess it should be fairly easy to determine once you know what to look for, though. Ideally I'd want to future proof this as well.
So yeah, I'm now gathering info for the eventual purchase which would be probably at the end of the year, or maybe in the summer. Then I'll search for tutorials on building your machine since this will be the first one I'll assembre myself from scratch. _________________ Guayaba 2600
Last edited by Iacus on Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:34 pm |
|
|
howdy.
for the record, your cost:time estimates are a little off. you can easily build a $600 machine to last you 5 years. beyond that point, you get seriously diminishing cost returns; building a machine to last you ~6-7 years would realistically elevate you up over $1000, and beyond 6-7 it's really not possible to make predictions (we've seen plateaus lately, but who knows if x86 will finally become not-the-norm in half a decade).
but, real quick answers to your specific questions:
a 3770 is fine. it looks like the cheap 2500ks have finally disappeared from microcenter, so I can no longer offer you something that's 3/4 as powerful for 1/2 of the price. if you want it, go for it.
16gb is also fine. don't spend more than a hundred bucks on it. 8 would be sufficient if you aren't planning to run VMs and such, but hey, maybe the current console generation will make devs very lazy about memory.
you need to spend about $350 right now to get an nvidia card without nvidia's typical mid-end handicap, and $350 is a stupid amount of money. either wait for the 700 series where they might ship a *60 with better memory bandwidth, or just get a 7870. unless you're planning on running linux. oh, you are. well then, wait for the 700 series.
I'd say a 128gb ssd is fine -- the average OS footprint these days is like 10-20GB, and that gives you enough room on the thing to store all of your productivity stuff and maybe a handful of games (though there's really very little purpose to storing games on an SSD right now, since most games are developed with optical media load times in mind, and even a 7200rpm hard drive is a speedup).
have you considered an mITX mobo? I love mine. all it chops off vs. mATX (which already chops off the second PCI-E, so no SLI, and two of the four ram slots, which you don't need anyway) are the PCI slots, which are almost all redundant with USB stuff nowadays.
blu-ray burners are cheap, I got a notebook-sized one (because my mITX case only takes notebook-sized optical drives) for $60. granted, that's triple the cost of a dvd-rw, and you probably already have one lying around, so unless you have form factor as an excuse, it's kind of a wishy-washy investment.
if you don't get a case that comes with a reputable PSU (don't let anyone tell you these don't exist -- they do, particularly with boutique case manufacturers, e.g. silverstone, but even when a plain jane case purports to come with a PSU > 500w, it's probably going to be hefty enough for your needs), get an earthwatts. but don't feel the need to overcompensate too heavily here. a 2500k and a 7850 would be happy on 350w; add 50w for the 3770 and 50w for a 670/760, and you're good above 450w. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:52 pm |
|
|
you should give some thought to perhaps getting a used higher-end card from a previous generation, if it'll cost less than the current set. I, for instance, have a GTX 470 and after some research, came to the conclusion that I'd have to spend $200+ just from something that isn't a sidegrade, performance wise (let's not take power consumption in account, like a Fermi could ever win that battle). If you could get, say, a 570 or 6950 on the cheap (seems like they're going on ebay for ~160-200), that's roughly 7870 level there and the extra you'd be paying for new would be whatever warranty you get. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Iacus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:06 pm |
|
|
| Felix wrote: |
| have you considered an mITX mobo? I love mine. all it chops off vs. mATX (which already chops off the second PCI-E, so no SLI, and two of the four ram slots, which you don't need anyway) are the PCI slots, which are almost all redundant with USB stuff nowadays. |
Don't most high end cards require two slots nowadays?
Plus, there are probably space (and refrigeration?) concerns too. The GTX 690 is 11 inches long...
I'm hesitant to buy used hardware, especially from ebay (didn't have too much luck with them) but I can wait for the next series of Nvidias. I intend to buy this this summer but I can wait until end of the year if it means I can get better value.
Thanks about the time estimates. Then it's better to spec for a 5 year lifespan and then probably upgrade from there. _________________ Guayaba 2600 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
bza a very bad gay

Joined: 24 Jul 2010 Location: A cave in a swamp somewhere
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:19 pm |
|
|
High end video cards require space for two slots next to each other, not two separate PCIe slots. Most motherboards nowadays have space for wide cards as well as dual PCIe slots for SLI. My mATX motherboard has dual PCIe and one PCI slot that I don't use, so slimming down to mITX isn't a big issue unless you have really big hands or trouble with tight quarters. It's totally doable if you want to have a powerful but small footprint PC.
I nabbed a 7870 gHz edition for just under $200 on sale after shopping around, so always be on the lookout for deals and rebates! AMD won't be coming out with a new lineup this year, but rumor has it Nvidia is going to be coming out with cut-down versions of the GTX Titan this year. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:49 pm |
|
|
In terms of case space, an 11-inch card in an average mid-tower ATX case will come to about or start encroaching on where the hard drives get mounted. It's not an issue in most regular sized cases, and any small form factor case will advertise the fact that it can hold a full-sized card. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
another god
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:37 pm |
|
|
Anyone expecting SSD prices to go down in the next year or two? _________________ interdimensional |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Broco

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Headquarters
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:41 pm Post subject: Re: WARNING: A Next-Gen is approaching fast (PC Build thread |
|
|
| Iacus wrote: |
| SSD Size: 128 or 256 GB? The last few years I've been using a 128GB partition for software and OS, and it seems to be enough for me. I just install games and store documents/downloads in a separate partition or external storage, but if the SSD prices are reasonable, there's no harm in getting a higher capacity drive. I intend to dual boot Windows/Ubuntu on the thing, so extra room will definitely help. |
I find shuffling files around because my SSD is too small gets to be a pretty big pain and I would definitely avoid that if I were building a new rig today. It's much easier to install all steam games on the HDD for instance, but then you don't benefit from your SSD for their load times. I'd say get a big one (like you could devote your budget to go as high as 512GB) or look into using that Intel motherboard feature that lets you merge the SSD and HDD into a single logical C: drive. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Iacus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:41 pm |
|
|
| Broco wrote: |
| look into using that Intel motherboard feature that lets you merge the SSD and HDD into a single logical C: drive. |
What would that be good for? How would I know which files are in the HDD and which ones in the SSD?
At the moment, I don't have space problems. I made a 128GB system partition in part to get used to typical SSD sizes, and i've still got 40GB to spare even with all my main software installed (which includes Netbeans, Photoshop, Unity and other big programs). All my games are in a secondary partition, though.
Still, if SSDs are now cheap enough, there's no reason not to get a larger size. I'm not exactly sure how serious is the SSD lifespan problem vis-a-vis HDDs (reports say it's recommended to replace HDDs every 3 to 5 years) so I don't really need/want to store valuable data in an SSD and I'd only use it for the OS and other software. _________________ Guayaba 2600 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:10 pm |
|
|
I don't think it combines the HDD and SDD into 1 logical drive, but rather uses the SDD as a cache for the system. So, like a cheaper, slower RAM disk. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:17 pm |
|
|
SSD failure rates are too darn high for me to want to get one over 128gb, the z68/z77 feature that combines them into one logical drive (which, yes, is more of a cache than a raid0 thing, because the latter would be really really unreliable) only works on windows, and the speedup, while nice, is more valuable on a notebook than a desktop
shrug |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Iacus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 5:36 pm |
|
|
So, any recommendation for brands of RAM, SSDs and motherboards?
(or conversely, brands that I should avoid buying?) _________________ Guayaba 2600 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Business

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Hiding
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 1:52 am |
|
|
Watch out for MSI. Those cats are whack and use crappy pins to mount their cooling equipment.
For those dealing with space issues on Windows with a 128GB SSD, it would be worth looking into whether or not the hibernate and page files are being housed on the SSD. If they are then disable those suckers. I speak from my own experiences with an Intel 120GB drive I had hosting Win 7. I noticed that, despite containing little real data, this drive was almost completely full on a reasonably fresh install. Even after relocating several steam games to a magnetic platter HDD I was still missing gigs of space that I could not account for. Upon examining the contents of the rapidly filling drive I discovered right away two hidden files on the C:\ root roughly the size of all the RAM in my system accompanied by another file just slightly smaller than the other. These were the pagefile and the hiberfile, which are used for swapping data out of RAM and hibernating the machine respectively.
The sum of the two hidden files I had found amounted to gigs of lost space. This machine does not likely swap much, in fact its debatable whether it has ever truly needed to swap memory at all thus far. Fortunately one can replace either of the two files. I kept the pagefile, ultimately, but moved it to my magnetic platter HDD just to keep windows from bitching excessively. If my machine ever starts swapping under my current arrangement then something is thoroughly amiss.
All this freed up gobs of space on my C:\ drive so now all my Windows stuff has room to work a bit better than it did before. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:19 am |
|
|
I think it's safe to say that Asus and Gigabyte are top-tier mobo manufacturers and probably make a board that fulfills your needs and/or caters to a particular price point you might be aiming for in either flavor (AMD or Intel) _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:20 am |
|
|
MCS, Biostar, Elitegroup, and the other bottom-tier mobo manufacturers are generally to be avoided. my rule of thumb for picking a mobo is to look for one of the better chipsets for whatever CPU generation you're building against (e.g. Z68 for sandybridge), then try and get something in the smallest reasonable form factor from one of the cheap-but-not-too-cheap manufacturers (Gigabyte, AsRock, ASUS).
ramwise, there's a wholesaler on Amazon called Komputerbay that's super cheap and which I've had good luck with. five years ago you couldn't really do any better than GSkill and that other brand for either price or reliability, but that's no longer quite true |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Toptube Anti-cabbage Party Candidate
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:11 am |
|
|
Mr. Business, your swap file SHOULD be on your SSD.
--------------------------------------
Iacus, if you are a user managing a ton of data and find it difficult to choose between drive types, they do make hybrid drives with an SSD cache that gives a good deal of performance boost.
I personally wouldn't mess with any mobos not made by Asus or Gigabyte, unless I was looking for some super specific feature/functionality that they for some reason didn't offer. or if I was absolutely pinching pennies and had found something good (based on reviews) for significantly less money than an Asus or Gigabyte.
The only videocard brand I wouldn't buy is PNY. I wouldn't buy PNY anything, really.
It's worth noting that ATI is doing the graphics for all of the next gen consoles. Its safe to assume that ATI cards will probably perform better in the PC ports of console games. So unless your linuxing is super serious, you might consoder an ATI card.
Also, you may want to get something above the 7870/660ti, if you want the graphics card to last the entire next console generation. Its likely those cards will be fine at 1080p with console equivalent settings for the first year or two. But late in the generation, I would expect better cards will be needed to keep up.
If you are getting an i7, you should make sure to get a triple channel ram setup. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
internisus shafer sephiroth
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 5:52 am |
|
|
Have a look at Samsung's 840 SSD series (not 840 Pro).
http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-MZ-7TD250BW-Series-Solid-2-5-Inch/dp/B009NHAEXE
Samsung is the only company that makes its own controller. They are probably the most reliable SSDs you can get; in fact, I dunno what this hullabaloo about SSD failures is as I'd trust a Samsung SSD far more than a mechanical drive to not suddenly die. No need to worry about its lifespan, either, as you could write something like 30 GB per day for 10 years before needing to worry that you're close to exceeding its operations limit.
The whole point of the 840s was to bring prices down. As you can see, they are really nice, and I don't know why you wouldn't choose a 250 GB for that price. Wouldn't it be nice to play games off the thing like God intended? There was about half a year between the 830 and 840 series, so by the time you are ready to buy there might be an 850 or something, but you have to give it a little time after it's new for the prices to settle down.
I've built using both Gigabyte and ASUS motherboards and also recommend them. I love motherboards. I spent a lot of time over the past year watching feature tours for ASUS boards. That's where all the potential comes from, you know? Everything you could possibly do is implied by the motherboard, so it's exciting to compare them and pick the right one for you.
Small form factor has gotten pretty nifty recently with a few cases like the Bitfenix Prodigy or the Silverstone FT03. However, while they continue to appeal to my aesthetic sensibilities, I no longer want to build mATX computers because, as I wrote after the last one:
| Quote: |
I've done two of them now. It's satisfying and aesthetically pleasing to make full use of a compact space, but attaching all of the internal connectors, SATA cables, IO headers, etc. can be excruciating. It seems counter-intuitive, but the small form factor of a micro can actually make cables reach less far as you route them through the management holes around the tray and thread them past other obstacles.
But an important factor is the size of your heat sink apparatus and expansion cards. I'm so glad that I went with integrated video here and didn't have a discrete graphics card in my way. You can also make things a lot easier if you spend the extra money needed to procure a fully modular power supply.
What you see here looks like sloppy cabling work—and maybe it is a little bit—but every single wire in this photo is connected up to something, and 90% of them gave me very little leeway with which to work. It was all I could do to tie things a bit here and there to ensure that the primary wind corridor from the front 180mm fan through the drive cage into the CPU cooler and out the rear 120mm is clear of blockage and that none of the cables are physically touching the fan blades.
It was difficult, and there were things that were so hard to connect to the motherboard that I used pliers for precision and reach. Research your case very carefully, and invest in a flashlight and magnetic screwdriver. Actually, have a few different Phillips-head screwdrivers, and make sure at least one is capable of reaching a long ways through a fairly small hole.
I have to say though that I don't know anything about the mini form factor and how it would compare to a micro like this. I'd like to try one sometime. When everything's finished, it's satisfying to have a sweet machine packed inside a tight case. I guess I'm a glutton for punishment. |
I highly recommend a fully modular power supply. You probably won't get one coming with a case. Nvidia's 600 series is quite power efficient, so you don't need much; 450W would be enough. You don't want it to be strained all the time, either, though. Ideally, a PSU's performance sweet spot is in the middle of its maximum output, but almost no one spends on that much unnecessary overhead. I'd get something like the Corsair HX750. You could run 2 video cards on it easily; you definitely don't need it, but a reliable power supply can last years and years. Felix will yell at you, though.
For your video card, if you're going Nvidia, the 660ti is probably the sweet spot. If you really want more, as I'm sure Felix will tell you, it's foolish to go above the 670 because the performance difference between the 670 and 680 is quite small. Don't hold your breath for the 700 series; this is a weird year for video cards.
You should figure out your RAM after you choose a case and a CPU heatsink; the latter will determine how much clearance you have for the RAM slots. Some brands like Mushkin and Kingston have short sticks that will be fine no matter what you select, but you don't want to buy some tall Corsair Vengeance thing and discover on build day that there's just no way. There are different speeds of RAM, but most people don't care or say that the real-world effect is negligible. However, there's no reason not to get 1600 MHz, I'd say. The difference from 1333 is like five bucks. Just check that your motherboard can actually use it at that speed. I think this will matter more for a better CPU (the 3770 is a very good CPU), especially for professional work like video editing and Photoshop. I think.
Speaking of which, are you sure you don't want a 3770K so you can overclock it? With decent cooling, you can push it pretty hard.
For heatsinks and fans, I like Noctua. You need to decide your motherboard and case before you can figure this out, though, both for space reasons and to determine airflow.
Note that if you only listened to my advice, even if I was being conservative (and I have been in this post), you'd spend at least a couple hundred more altogether than you would listening to Felix or probably almost anyone else here. I like nicer kit, and I don't have a car or any other grown-up toys to dump money into. If you're building your own PC, it's just nice to have good stuff to play with, and spending a little extra can give you peace of mind as well as performance overhead. It's not a practical perspective; it's a hobbyist one. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:04 pm |
|
|
| toptube makes a good point -- if you aren't ditching windows entirely, go ahead and get a 7850/7870, as they're way better engineered to the $150-250 range than nvidia's stuff, and all that you really lose in linux with an AMD card is 2D acceleration (not at all necessary with an i7) and bleeding-edge wine compatibility (but you have windows). |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
another god
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:15 pm |
|
|
| the thing is that the reference 670 PCB isn't even that big -- it would fit comfortably in my miniITX case if not for the fact that the heatsinks are all several inches longer than the PCB itself. why they decided to shrink the PCB (which is not necessarily that hard when you can just use fewer, larger DRAM chips, though it is generally more expensive) rather than just making smaller heatsinks, I don't know, but the fact that people are still playing with this architecture appeals to me, as I'm pretty much resigned to the fact that my next video card will be sub-$200, 256-bit memory architecture Kepler, I'm just not sure when I'll be able to get that. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Iacus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 11:09 am |
|
|
Oh, man. I didn't even think about heatsinks. I was just going to use the stock fan. How important is a heatsink in one of those builds?
I've researched some mini-ITX cases and I think they are not for me.
micro-ATX could work, but its hard enough to find cases that I like that can also house all the necessary components in that form factor...
I think I'll end up being boring and build on a mid tower. _________________ Guayaba 2600 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:07 pm |
|
|
| I've always used stock cooling and always gotten a solid 25%-ish overclock out of whatever CPU I'm using |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
internisus shafer sephiroth
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:45 am |
|
|
| An aftermarket heat sink is not strictly necessary but is always a good idea. You don't have to spend $80 on a Noctua one. You can get something for like $30 or whatever that will still be an improvement over the piece of junk that comes with Intel chips. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
thestage banned
Joined: 27 Sep 2011
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 3:31 am |
|
|
| I thought these days the stock intel one was considered pretty good |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Monochrome

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:59 am |
|
|
| BIOS won't post with this Powercolor HD7750 in it. Everything else including my old video card works fine. Thought my trusty but aging 450W PSU might be the problem -- new card claims to need 400W but that's cutting it close especially since the 12v connector is a 4-pin with a converter -- so I upgraded to a new 550W. Still nothing. Any ideas before I RMA? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:47 pm |
|
|
| a 7750 would definitely run on 450w. unless you're just up and forgetting to plug in the PCI-E power, it's probably toast. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
a pair of gators

Joined: 15 Mar 2011 Location: techno, trance, and torment music
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:16 am |
|
|
i'm toying around with the idea of building a computer maybe? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/PQyI
i haven't built a PC since like 2005 so feel free to tell me how wrong all of this is |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Toptube Anti-cabbage Party Candidate
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:29 am |
|
|
| a pair of gators wrote: |
i'm toying around with the idea of building a computer maybe? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/PQyI
i haven't built a PC since like 2005 so feel free to tell me how wrong all of this is |
My two issues with that build is that your power supply needs to be bigger and if you are going i7, you should get a triple channel memory setup. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
internisus shafer sephiroth
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:02 pm |
|
|
Yeah, you should definitely dump a little more money into your PSU.
I have a question about this triple-channel memory configuration thing. I've already bought just about all of my PC parts, and I never even heard of this until a couple of weeks ago. The RAM I got is 2 pairs (4 sticks total) of 4 GB at 1866 MHz. My motherboard has 4 slots total, not 3 or 6. And looking into it now, I'm seeing people say that there appears to be little benefit to triple-slot memory at this time. Have I sabotaged myself? Did I even have the opportunity to do things differently given my motherboard? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:45 pm |
|
|
380w is totally fine when it's a respectable brand like that, provided you switch to an i5 and a 7850. if you have a microcenter anywhere nearby, get your CPU from them, they are way cheaper.
and that'd be my recommendation! the 660 is a lopsided card, and even though it's no longer overpriced, the only reason to get it over a 7850 is a) a bit of raw power you can make up in overclocking, and b) the usual nvidia advantage in opengl (whether it's scientific computing or gaming in linux). also most mATX boards only have two memory slots, check that, you probably don't want four ram sticks (komputerbay is an amazon seller that makes supercheap memory, I got 2x8gb from them about nine months ago for $70). you're overpaying for the mobo too, look for a z68 board on clearance somewhere (check ncix's ebay shop) for <$100. case is also a little pricey even for silverstone, I got a mITX one from them including a 450w psu for only $110. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
notbov

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:45 pm |
|
|
| Toptube wrote: |
| a pair of gators wrote: |
i'm toying around with the idea of building a computer maybe? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/PQyI
i haven't built a PC since like 2005 so feel free to tell me how wrong all of this is |
My two issues with that build is that your power supply needs to be bigger and if you are going i7, you should get a triple channel memory setup. |
LGA 1155 CPUs and mobos don't do triple-channel memory; the first set of i7s did, but outside of those, Intel is dual-channel in the consumer space _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
internisus shafer sephiroth
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:56 pm |
|
|
| notbov wrote: |
| LGA 1155 CPUs and mobos don't do triple-channel memory; the first set of i7s did, but outside of those, Intel is dual-channel in the consumer space |
Yeah, I'm looking into this, and it seems like triple-channel is irrelevant to my Z77 motherboard and 3770k CPU. I'm not even sure where triple is supported, actually, as the main alternative to dual-channel seems to be quad in those eATX motherboards like the X79 with big LGA 2011 CPUs and eight DIMM slots, an expense that even I consider ridiculous unless you are a professional 3D modeler or video editor. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:29 pm |
|
|
| oh, and 2TB is sort of the sweet spot for a hard drive nowadays, you can find one of those for $100 without too much trouble |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
parker a wolf adventuring

Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: suplex city
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:40 pm |
|
|
What's the best stereo speaker setup for a desktop and is it worth pirating windows 8 when I get a new pc or just stick with win 7. Also whoever had said "no more restarting for updates all the time with win 7" was full of shit. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Felix unofficial repository
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: vancouver
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:18 pm |
|
|
| Honestly if you want to "move on" to something new from Win7 using a traditional desktop (for the purposes of this conversation, that'd be x86 and no touching), use Linux. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
parker a wolf adventuring

Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: suplex city
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:38 pm |
|
|
I'd like to give microsoft the finger but not enough to become a programmer science man person if that's what it takes. What's the deal with games in linux, I don't even know how that works. I got to be able to play my old sierra games or Max Payne 2 or whatever at a moments notice. Mostly I use my pc to horde every movie ever made and watch them on my nice tv I could afford by never paying for movies. I'd have to figure out all the bit perfect sound and 24fps playback horseshit out all over again. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
remote

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:44 pm |
|
|
i've still got this i3, 4gb ram, gtx 460, etc. it still serves me well enough, but maybe this summer/fall i should start implementing some upgrades. _________________
letterboxd | last.fm | steam |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
spinach hardline radical martian

Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Location: San Francisco, CA, USA!
|
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
parker a wolf adventuring

Joined: 31 May 2007 Location: suplex city
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:56 pm |
|
|
Shit that's exactly what I was looking to read. You're a champion of the people felix. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
spinach hardline radical martian

Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Location: San Francisco, CA, USA!
|
Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:01 pm |
|
|
also yeah you can play sierra games flawlessly on linux since forever _________________
| mauve wrote: |
| thieves are more boons to other classes than anything else. |
http://pleasestopthese.tumblr.com |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|