|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Rei sexy mf'er
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:57 pm |
|
|
Last edited by Rei on Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ni Go Zero Ichi

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:45 am |
|
|
Rei once you're done compiling all this research on sexism in Kojima's gameography it might be worth seeing if you can have it published as a feature on Insertcredit. It'd certainly be... provocative. _________________ Just another savage day on Planet Earth. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Iacus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:39 pm |
|
|
| Rei wrote: |
| I mean, every method has flaws and they certainly don't work with every situation, but they can help you see things in different ways. We don't get rid of something because it doesn't work for most situations but has a use in some. We keep those sorts of things, too, yeah? |
It's certainly something to keep in mind. However I think it's far more useful to have in mind as a creator than as a method of analysis. As a simple binary pass/fail, the Bechdel test by itself says nothing about the content it's actually analizing besides it's own premise, which can be tautological to the point of triviality (e.g. "this male-centered story features limited interaction from women characters -> the women characters in this story don't interact much between themselves")
| apfEID wrote: |
| Iacus wrote: |
But isn't this very example proof that passing the Bechdel test means jack shit?
|
Actually, no, because the Bechdel test is intentionally an extremely low bar for a piece of media to meet, and even with the bar set that low, that so many films (and games) can't succeed, is telling in and of itself. |
"can't" implies intent to succeed and failure to do so. We have to also consider the posibility that someone might not consider a narrative requirement to feature two named female characters talking about not-men.
More to the point, this is an "extremely low bar" in relation to what, exactly?
Are we going to start grading fiction in a linear scale of Bechdel singularities? What would be the metric, here? The amount of female characters talking amongst themselves? Perhaps the degree to which their conversation is unrelated to the subject of "men"?
And this tells us what, about the narrative besides its own premise?
You can see for yourself. MGS4 passes the Bechdel test, but does so with a scene that's not only jarring and badly written, but is presented in a way that reinforces gender roles even when taken in the context of the whole game.
I far too often see feminist "criticism" in the form of phrases like "The Lord of the Rings doesn't pass the Bechdel test". So what? This only means that the premises for this arbitrary test are not met in this particular narrative. It is often used as a throwaway accusation without regard for context or appropriateness.
Of course as Rei said, it's only a tool to be used in combination with more detailed analysis, but I feel that people lend too much value to the pass/fail result of such test. _________________ Guayaba 2600 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Levi

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:44 pm |
|
|
| lol |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Vikram Ray

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:38 pm |
|
|
| ^ could you not do that? this thread has so far been pretty level-headed, that kind of thing is just going to make people defensive and weird. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ni Go Zero Ichi

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:43 pm |
|
|
| And levelheadedness on these topics is fragile, to boot. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baseballkappe
Joined: 14 Nov 2010 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:26 am |
|
|
lol though
Well I mean, I agree that the Bechdel test isn't a very good test of whether an individual piece of media is sexist, but I don't think anyone here said that.
What it is great for, though, is analyzing trends (which is what Rei was doing btw). The fact that so many movies, and probably even more games, don't pass this simple test. This, unless you're cool with women invariably being portrayed as subordinate to men, is alarming. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
RT-55J maverick

Joined: 15 Mar 2010 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:39 am |
|
|
| Legitimately curious right now if anything ever would fail a gender-flopped Bechdel test. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baseballkappe
Joined: 14 Nov 2010 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:45 am |
|
|
| Touhou |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
schroeder

Joined: 06 Mar 2013 Location: Interior of mind n+1
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:00 am |
|
|
Probably some romance novels? A first-person character study with a female narrator?
The Bechdel Test always frustrates me because it's obviously meant to examine whole genres or artists' oeuvres, but its structure suggests that it's about individual pieces.
Would a Bechdel' Test, whereby a group of works only passes if at least one of its members passes the Bechdel Test, make sense? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
LandRoverAttack

Joined: 09 Oct 2007 Location: sagamihara, kanagawa
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:19 am |
|
|
K-On _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Vikram Ray

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:35 am |
|
|
| schroeder wrote: |
| The Bechdel Test always frustrates me because it's obviously meant to examine whole genres or artists' oeuvres, but its structure suggests that it's about individual pieces. |
how is that obvious, if the structure of the test itself suggests otherwise? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:13 am |
|
|
Iacus: your problem is that you're not talking to anybody. Your point is that some people misuse the Bechdel test, but Rei did not misuse the Bechdel test. Well... Rei is the one posting. What are we debating about?
Your post comes off as a person who has Something To Say about the Bechdel test and when you saw the words pop up on your screen you were like HOLD ON I HAVE OPINIONS. That isn't conversation, it's mutual ranting.
When you start a sentence like this:
| Iacus wrote: |
| I far too often see feminist "criticism" |
it should be a clue that no discussion is taking place. It's like, you see it where? Here? Right now? If not, what's the point? Why ascribe something you don't like to something you do like (by your own admission you like Rei's analyses so far) just because it shares a bit of vocabulary? What's to be gained?
EDIT: I should add:
This goes double when you the person you are talking past is a person who is putting forth an intelligent critique from an oppressed perspective. "Hold on guys. You're doing good now, but WATCH OUT. Feminists sometimes misuse this stuff. You haven't done it yet, but like yeah. They misuse all the time. I am going to write paragraphs about how they misuse it. But uh, you haven't. Yet. Just sayin."
Well, it makes you look like an apologist, man. It's a conversation stopper, because how is anyone supposed to respond to the allegation "you haven't done a bad thing, but sometimes other people do"? Either they say well that's not me...? and drift off into confusion, or their hackles get raised. What do you mean some people do it wrong? Which people? What's your agenda here anyway? Suddenly whatever good discussion was going on is replaced by vitriol.
I'm not saying you're doing any of this deliberately of course, I'm just saying that's what the post looks like to this third-person reader. _________________ Let's Play, starring me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
schroeder

Joined: 06 Mar 2013 Location: Interior of mind n+1
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:48 am |
|
|
Well, failing the Bechdel Test essentially means, "Women are peripheral to this work," which (I would say obviously) isn't problematic in a single work. Nearly every reference I have seen to the Bechdel Test is explicit that it doesn't rate the quality of any one work.
The structure clashes with this application because the test didn't originate as a tool of social criticism. In the comic where it first appears, it's one woman's method of choosing movies to watch. In that context, "Women are peripheral to this work" is as reasonable a disqualifier as any. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
evnvnv hapax legomenon

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: the los angeles
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:24 am |
|
|
| schroeder wrote: |
Well, failing the Bechdel Test essentially means, "Women are peripheral to this work," which (I would say obviously) isn't problematic in a single work. Nearly every reference I have seen to the Bechdel Test is explicit that it doesn't rate the quality of any one work.
The structure clashes with this application because the test didn't originate as a tool of social criticism. In the comic where it first appears, it's one woman's method of choosing movies to watch. In that context, "Women are peripheral to this work" is as reasonable a disqualifier as any. |
I'd say it actually Is a problem in a single work. Sure, maybe it's not a HUGE problem in the grand scheme of things, but once you realize how rarely a simple thing like a conversation between two women occurs in fiction, every further example is another thorn.
Part of me is actually more irritated that screenwriters/etc. haven't caught on and included those scenes for the sole purpose of passing the test. Like, how hard would that be? What is the excuse? _________________ The text will not live forever. The cup are small |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CubaLibre the road lawyer

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: Balmer
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:33 am |
|
|
People keep buying tickets and no one gives a shit. _________________ Let's Play, starring me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Age Iron Savior king of finders

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Spacecraft, Juanelia Country
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:06 am |
|
|
this is a pretty darn good conversation (mostly thanks to Rei). The Bechdel Test concept invites interesting discussion but in the wrong circumstances, people criticizing it (or sometimes championing it) can derail a debate into absurdities. Glad to see more measured consideration here.
I do want to add, however, that I think the test is somewhat less useful to evaluate the medium of video games due to the sheer number which, even in recent years, tend to stick with the singular perspective of the playable lead. That the lead is almost invariably male is an issue in itself, of course, but it still skews things in a way considerably different from the majority of other narrative media. Although Kojima is obviously fair game, given....well, nearly everything about how he designs the MGS series and Snatcher/Policenauts. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
schroeder

Joined: 06 Mar 2013 Location: Interior of mind n+1
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:14 am |
|
|
| evnvnv wrote: |
I'd say it actually Is a problem in a single work. Sure, maybe it's not a HUGE problem in the grand scheme of things, but once you realize how rarely a simple thing like a conversation between two women occurs in fiction, every further example is another thorn.
Part of me is actually more irritated that screenwriters/etc. haven't caught on and included those scenes for the sole purpose of passing the test. Like, how hard would that be? What is the excuse? |
I'm willing to accept that there are (at least a few) stories to be told about men in the absence of women and that their exclusion of women isn't a flaw(There's a place for Hemingway). It's only the skewed values of literature (reflecting broader society) that make that problematic (That place isn't everywhere).
As for why writers don't just write some women for god's sake, they all think they're Hemingway. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Iacus

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Stockholm
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:57 am |
|
|
Cuba: you are absolutely correct. I apologize for getting distracted into ranting.
Let me rewind and go back to my original point, that being "the Bechdel test is pretty useless"
So, yeah. I concede the Bechdel test can be adopted to "ping" for trends in female representation in media, but as someone who strongly believes that every narrative should follow its own agenda and it's not obligated to portray women in any particular way (you can have your Reservoir Dogs AND your Death Proofs, and you aren't necessarily a misogynist for creating a story, or even many stories, where men are the primary characters) , I believe people lend too much weight to the result of a test that, individually, tells you essentially nothing. Since Rei framed her post in the context of the test, that's what I perceived her to be doing, until her clarification.
| Quote: |
| The fact that so many movies, and probably even more games, don't pass this simple test. This, unless you're cool with women invariably being portrayed as subordinate to men, is alarming. |
Yeah, the thing is that neither passing the test guarantees absence of gender bias nor failing it means that women are portrayed subordinately. The info you get from that pass/fail is incredibly limited for anything more than superficial analysis.
So, using the same example as Wikipedia, I don't think The Name of the Rose would be improved by adding more female characters with their own conversations. The setting (a monastery in medieval times) would have suffered for it.
Now, whether "secret tactical espionage operations" is a genre/setting that should be understood as predominantly male, is up for debate I guess.
(please note I'm not disregarding Kojima's projection of a sexist mindset into his work when I say this, I'm merely addressing the parts relevant to the Bechdel test)
But yeah, ultimately I think all of us are in agreement with this. If you are going to apply the Bechdel test, be aware of its limitations. _________________ Guayaba 2600 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
apfEID
Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Location: NYC / Lordran
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:13 pm |
|
|
I was trying to point out almost the same thing you are: the Bechdel test is not meant to be used as a "is this work misogynist?" yes/no test, it's not meant to be saying anything other than what it is saying. Which is just "hey, there's a ridiculous number of movies that are so disinterested in women that they can't meet this easy measure of representing women as people rather than as people defined by their relationship to men."
Sure, some people like to make the Bechdel test into more than it is intended to be, but that's on them, and not on the rest of us, and I don't see anyone here using it for more than it is. Rei's example of MGS4 passing the test is explicitly one of "well, this conversation was incredibly sexist, but right at the end, they actually talk about something other than living your life for dudes, so it passes."
I think John Carpenter's The Thing is a perfect movie. I'd just like to see more films that skew the other way in gender. _________________ Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
http://ageoffire.tumblr.com |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baseballkappe
Joined: 14 Nov 2010 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:45 pm |
|
|
| Iacus wrote: |
| So, using the same example as Wikipedia, I don't think The Name of the Rose would be improved by adding more female characters with their own conversations. The setting (a monastery in medieval times) would have suffered for it. |
dang, all those monastery movies skewing the results, this test is useless after all
I mean, whatever, I see what you're trying to say, but Kojima is not merely constructing a boys-only world, he repeatedly goes out of his way to tell us something about The Nature of Women. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
schroeder

Joined: 06 Mar 2013 Location: Interior of mind n+1
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:56 pm |
|
|
| Speaking of genres skewing the results, this is a pretty interesting look at various aggregated Bechdel passage rates. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
analogos bravely default crying fairy

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:06 pm |
|
|
| Dark Age Iron Savior wrote: |
| I do want to add, however, that I think the test is somewhat less useful to evaluate the medium of video games due to the sheer number which, even in recent years, tend to stick with the singular perspective of the playable lead. That the lead is almost invariably male is an issue in itself, of course, but it still skews things in a way considerably different from the majority of other narrative media. Although Kojima is obviously fair game, given....well, nearly everything about how he designs the MGS series and Snatcher/Policenauts. |
More than that, even, I might argue that Metal Gear Solid has a special knack for aggravating this issue with the extent to which its social interplay is so insular and disjointed, if at all present. It's not only rare for more than two people to be speaking to each other at any given time, it's rare for these individuals to even share the same physical space. Said interactions themselves are just as often closer to a monologue directed (abstractly, if not explicitly) at the player -- leaving the avatar out of the conversation almost entirely -- than do they resemble an actual conversation.
I wouldn't take this as grounds for an apology for the resultant female interactions that do take place, however. If anything it only helps cast the worryingly consistent problems involved in the opportunities the games do take to include female voices further into observably oeuvre-defining relief. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ronnoc

Joined: 26 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:50 am |
|
|
Bladewolf should have been a lady dog-robot.
(I'm not joking) |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
CONSUME_PRODUCTS

Joined: 29 Jan 2012
|
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:35 am |
|
|
| Rei wrote: |
Snatcher, wherein Gillian Seed meets up with three women at the game’s end. There is only one line of dialogue where the women seem to interact, and it’s to tell Gillian they’ve talked many times on the phone. The woman don’t actually talk to one another and all pay close attention to Gillian. It’s as if the scene was written to give the illusion of women interacting but without having to actually write it. |
kojima didn't write this, it was added in the english localisation
anyone doubting he's a horrible person should play policenauts, ugh |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|