|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:43 pm |
|
|
I wonder if the Doctor defeats Simm-Master and takes him to the future and leaves him with Chantho to create some kind of paradox where the Master is stuck circling as an aberration in time.
Even if that's not the case, I do agree with you that the Doctor did punish him. But I don't think he's actually done it yet. It's almost as-if this season has been training us to think about time differently. And how the order of events can be skewed.
Personally, I think the Master needs to be as manic and even more quirky than the Doctor to match him. If only to show how they're mirrors from each other, and this is how the Doctor would be if he didn't have a moral compass. A companion. Also, there's the idea that the Master syphoned off regeneration juice from the Doctor's hand. I wonder if that affected anything.
I also wonder how early that was planned out. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:05 pm |
|
|
It's noteworthy that the Master doesn't act manic until regenerated. In his Yana form, he's very much the sinister Master that we might expect. Carefully going about his business, preparing to leave, cleaning up loose ends.
Show mythology holds that Time Lords can effect a certain level of control over their regenerations, and here we see the Master quite explicitly regenerates to match the Tenth Doctor: Young, strong. And manic and cheeky, as Jack so usefully points out.
I just rewatched the ending scenes, and I'm not convinced the Master is siphoning from the hand. First, he doesn't grab the hand and stumble in after being shot -- he had already grabbed the hand and placed in the TARDIS as part of his other preparations. Second, during the regeneration, there's no streams of energy coming from the tank; it's just glowing different colours in sync with what's poring out of the Master. This is very possibly just meant to reflect the lighting in the room. The bubbling with the hand only means that the Doctor is in the vicinity.
I also just watched some bits of Human Nature again to check something:
-The Family follows them through the use of "a Time Agent's vortex manipulator" -- exactly what we now know Jack had! I nice little detail.
-Regarding the Chameleon Arch, the Doctor says "I never thought I'd use this. All the times I've wondered." It's not clear if this just means on himself, or on anyone. If he's not used it, why does he have it? Where did it come from? Did they become TARDIS Standard Issue during the Time War?
-There's post-it notes attached to the TARDIS viewscreen showing the pattern on the front and back of the watch, drawn in pen. Not sure why. Is that particular design of watch constant for all Chameleon Arches? _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:23 am |
|
|
| Ashura wrote: |
| I also wonder how early that was planned out. |
Yeah, really. I mean. It was a weird thing to do in the first place, severing his hand. And it was done in the same episode where the Doctor weirdly changed history by getting up Harriet Jones's butt. Which was also the last time we saw UNIT, which will be playing a big part next week. Apparently.
I'm more and more convinced that The Christmas Invasion was written with the expectation that series two would cover the ground that we're going over this year. Torchwood and the Rose business -- it's becoming blatantly obvious how much of a last-minute decision they were.
About the hand and lighting: I dunno. It's pretty explicitly gone wacky-color -- more so than anything else in the room aside from the Master. At the very least, it appears to be sympathetically reacting with what's going on. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:50 am |
|
|
In the commentary they mention that they had to grab John Barrowman and tell him he wouldn't be in series two without telling him at all about Torchwood. He was apparently completely disheartened about it.
Like I said before, I think Saxon was probably more involved in Torchwood in the earlier concept. Torchwood was around in some capacity during the first series, as evidenced in the finale.
One thing I see them doing this year that they shied away from is time flux. I think it's you who told me, Aderack, that they initially planned that the Queen would be killed and that would create the alternate world. But RTD didn't do this because it might be too complicated for viewers. He seems to think they can take it this year.
My friend and I watched this episode and Countrycide today. We've been slowly going through Torchwood together. His comments on Countrycide were interesting. He couldn't understand how Gwen wouldn't kill the cop-cannibal in the gun roundtable. He said that Jack coming in with the shotgun is the only thing which redeemed the episode for him- He said he couldn't understand how the cannibal characters survived and that the Torchwood guys should've killed them long before the end. He then proclaimed he hated the Gwen character.
I honestly hope they take stock in how bad the first series of Torchwood is and try to fix it with some better writers or... something. It's hard to go through a lot of these episodes again. I think there's maybe 3 or 4 I'd watch again. 2 of which are the finale. One of which is They Keep Killing Suzie. I realize on this watchthrough that they're a secret organization which is ass-retarded in keeping themselves secret. I also hope that whatever happens with Jack this year on Who carries over back into Torchwood... if he even survives into it.
I wonder if Jack will even appear in the first episode. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:15 am |
|
|
To be fair, Jack's Torchwood cell was also ass-retarded at a lot of other things.
Regarding ideas of temporal flux: it's interesting that the Doctor's problem with Jack is not that he immortal, per se, but rather that Jack is immutable. There is no flux, and no potential for flux. Apparently no amount of physical damage or time travel manipulation short of Rose's Deus Ex TARDIS can affect his existence. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:19 am |
|
|
There are a lot of small, mostly qualitative details about Torchwood 2. It's supposed to have a lighter tone and more humor. Also more "action", whatever that means. Jack is supposed to be more like Who Jack, instead of Mister Mopey. Plus he gets naked a lot. Supposedly a much more active role for Ianto now. They apparently have a firm direction in which they want to take things. They've added to the Hub set and changed a few things.
On the quantitative end, one episode is to deal with Jack's childhood in the fifty-first century. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:56 am |
|
|
That sounds like progress!
The first season suffered from a feeling of Jack Killing Time, Because Time Won't Kill Jack, treading water in anticipation of what's happening now. Once this is done with, it makes sense that they'd feel more able to chart a proper direction for the series with some long-term character arcs.
Speaking of killing time, I wonder what would happen if Jack encountered one of the Weeping Angels. Unlimited future-potential-energy to feed on! But he won't actually die in the past, so you can't have it!
I'm a bit disappointed Jack hasn't got around to bragging to the Doctor that he unleashed from the rift an immortal 200-foot tall god-monster from before time that feeds on life itself and fed it to death in a paradox that broke reality just a little bit, and that's why "the rift's been active."
Oh, but I suppose he can't do that because then all the kiddies would insist on watching Torchwood and Davies would get in trouble. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:57 am |
|
|
Yeah, it's true. Torchwood as a whole was pretty incompetent. Torchwood is almost like shoving Doctor Who into the enemy's base and making it work without going anywhere. Angel's 5th season was pretty much the same thing, take Angel Investigations -1 and shove them into Wolfram & Hart, and I think they made it work there. Let's hope they learn from season 1, anyway.
Doing some reading, yeah, I see even John Barrowman said it would have more humour and action. I think this is good news; it comes back to what I said earlier about how good dialogue can save a bad episode of Who.
Man, I would love to see what Steven Moffat would do with a Torchwood.
Hopefully they can also work on the production a bit more this year. There are some takes last year that made it into episodes which you know probably would've been better if they could've ran through it three or four more times. From all indications the first series was extremely rushed. It seems less so this year.
When is Sarah Jane Adventures supposed to start, anyway? I never even saw the special. Was it any good?
Also, I just realized Tosh was in a Doctor Who episode. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Lick Meth

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: A constant state of flux
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:11 pm |
|
|
I don't often ponder or try coming up with theories, but sometimes the simplest (simpler?) explanations work best.
The Master business: ignoring the whole Timelord War thing, because I was too young to know anything about it, so I'm disregarding it partly for this theory. Basically, the Master has ended up at the end of time, possibly to avoid the Timelord Wars (I wouldn''t have a clue), but hatches a plan to ship the last of existence's humans to certain doom. However, to carry out this plan with complete conviction, and not to go about at it half-heartedly, he turns himself into the human Yana, also as a way to pass the time whilst stuck at the end of the universe. But with the Doctor returning, and encouraging his watch to act like a voice in his head, he has no reason to remain as Yana and can thus escape, finally. During the time he was human, he'd aged considerably, and his death/resurrection was merely a stroke of luck.
The hand: simply put, he's keeping it purely for the same reason Jack had it: to warn him of the Doctor's presence should he return, and prepare suitably. That's pretty much it, there. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:18 pm |
|
|
| Ashura wrote: |
| Man, I would love to see what Steven Moffat would do with a Torchwood. |
He said somewhere that he wanted to do series one, except he was too busy with Jekyll. Speaking of which: first episode has aired. Haven't seen it.
Yeah, by all accounts Torchwood was a ridiculously fast production. The scripts were written, sets built, casting done in a matter of months. They started shooting in something like April, and finished in mid-October, after the series had started airing. Almost no time for post-production. Plus their cameras broke down during the first block, requiring them to reshoot much of the first two episodes.
For series two, they've been working on the scripts since series one; they started shooting about two months ago; and it's not airing until January. So they're leaving themselves a lot of room to work on this.
| Quote: |
| When is Sarah Jane Adventures supposed to start, anyway? I never even saw the special. Was it any good? |
The fall, sometime; I think about half of it has been shot now. The first episode was pretty damned great, actually; one of the most refreshing things to come out of New Who. It's got that Dahl-esque erudite children's story feel to it. Sort of a tingly feeling of magic. Although Lis Sladen can't act, she's more of a mentor figure than the central character -- and the kid who's playing the protagonist, Maria, is amazing. I don't know where they found her.
There's a really grating sidekick in the pilot, who they've dumped for the main series. Gossip suggests she was kind of impossible on the set, so they found someone everyone could get along with better.
I'd like to hear a longer, uncluttered version of the theme tune as well. It's sort of a whimsical, feminized take on the Who theme. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:21 pm |
|
|
Yeah, that was a pretty good episode!
I have not watched the preview for the next episode because I'm a purist like that. Though yeah, I predict something kind of cool!
It would be especially awesome if they "kind of" solve the situation, only to have it smartly come up again at the end of season 4! _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:09 pm |
|
|
| Ashura wrote: |
| Yeah, it's true. Torchwood as a whole was pretty incompetent. Torchwood is almost like shoving Doctor Who into the enemy's base and making it work without going anywhere. Angel's 5th season was pretty much the same thing, take Angel Investigations -1 and shove them into Wolfram & Hart, and I think they made it work there. Let's hope they learn from season 1, anyway. |
Hell yeah they made it work. Angel's 5th season was awesome.
Steven Moffat writing Torchwood could potentially be like Coupling only with aliens and time paradoxes. That is, I have to assume, what everyone would be hoping for if he wrote one.
In hindsight, several of the first season's weaker stories (the sex girl one, for instance, or Tosh's Psychic Lesbian Adventures) might have worked fine if they'd been infused with more of Moffat's comic sensibilities and less of the mopey.
That's good news on Sarah Jane Adventures. If they can refine the Dahl-ish qualities, keeping the whimsy while avoiding the camp (in other words, use enough restraint to drop all the awkward or grating elements) the show should be fun. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:47 am |
|
|
Seriously, especially after Angel's fourth season was so bad. Getting them out of the Hotel was so good for the show. I always found it kind of funny how Spike always replaces Cordelia whenever she leaves a show.
I just watched Sarah Jane Adventures. Wow, surprisingly good, except for said annoying sidekick, who looks like they conveniently wrote out! The Mr. Smith computer was kind of goofy, but I was surprised just how much better it was than most of Torchwood. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:55 am |
|
|
| 108 wrote: |
| I have not watched the preview for the next episode because I'm a purist like that. Though yeah, I predict something kind of cool! |
After the episode airs, totally go back and watch the preview. It's worth it for the last shot, which won't be in the episode itself. At least, not in this form.
Gareth Roberts (The Shakespeare Code) says his episode next year will follow directly from some of the events in the next two episodes -- so yeah, it looks like there will be some unresolved stuff.
Also, Steven Moffat seems to be writing a Cyberman story. Which... might be one of the best ideas ever, if you think about it. Though the Cybermen are a fantastic idea, when have they ever been used well? To some extent, I think the most effective Cyberman story might be "Cyberwoman". Also, note how they tie into Moffat's monster gallery -- physically and thematically.
Some non-spoilery yet tantalizing information about The Sound of Drums, from someone who consistently gets screener copies of these things. Much of it is just babbling about how amazing Simm's Master is, and how he balances off the Doctor. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:35 am |
|
|
I just noticed that CBC aired the first of season 3 earlier tonight. They seem to have finally straightened out their scheduling.
They're also, finally, airing Runaway Bride... tonight at midnight. The surprisingly slick website is worth a quick look:
| Quote: |
The Story So Far...
The story so far is that you dont need to know any story so far. Theres a man who calls himself the Doctor. He travels in time and space in a wooden box thats bigger on the inside than the outside.
Thats all you need to know. But some of us might want to know a little more. |
It looks like they've partnered with www.dwin.org to supply information.
Last summer they were advertising Torchwood as a upcoming series for the fall ... or winter ... and they never got around to putting on a schedule. Now they're trumpeting as a fall 2007 series, perhaps for reals this time. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:37 am |
|
|
| This person wrote: |
Its weird being back on the show, Barrowman says, not looking remotely fazed. Its a completely different Doctor and assistant to last time. Jacks looking at the Doctor going, Oooh, thisDoctor is funny and quirky and sexy. The other one was like a U-boat captain a bit dull. So theres an edge there that wasnt there before. And theres a lot of stuff resolved in this series for Jack. Theres this whole thing of where Jack comes from, what his story is, and when I read it, I rang Russell and said, I dont know what youve been smoking, but that is brilliant! God, I wish I could tell you what happens!
For reasons too complicated to explain, I do actually despite all the BBCs admirable, warlike levels of secrecy know what will happen in the season finale of Doctor Who. You do? Barrowman yelps. Ohmy-God, isnt it AMAAAAAAZING?
Barrowman is semi-incoherent with enthusiasm. We bounce up and down on the sofa, screaming, and then do a high-five. |
Also, weird fan update: everyone seems to be under the impression that Sally Sparrow is meant as a recurring character, and that she will play a big role next year. Why, I haven't the foggiest. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:13 am |
|
|
As much as I'd like that -- and like to get more of the Doctor's side of that story -- it would really betray the full-circle-bottle-episode-closure reached in Blink. Make her a recurring character on a spin-off, instead.
BTW, excellent point of Moffat and Cybermen. All of his episodes, so far, have featured a menacing, faceless collective who can't really help what they do: it's just who they are. Cyberwoman demonstrated that this is the most interesting way to handle the Cybermen as villains. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:32 am |
|
|
I noticed the thing with Sally and fans latching. She would make a great assistant I think, but I don't see why people are /expecting/ her to return. They keep talking about how Martha is leaving, too. Eh?
Plus they're talking about 'Oh David Tennant's leaving!!!' again, which is just, fine, whatever. Get over it. If it's true, fine. If it's not, fine. Hard shoes to fill, but it will eventually happen. From all indications he's having the time of his life right now, though, so I don't see him quitting. I also don't see the Doctor being a stigma on his career as some people see. It would be so easy for him to go to America where he's relatively unknown if all else fails. I think he's going to pull a Tom Baker, though.
Also, I want to say: The scene between the Doctor and Jack when he's in the radiation room was so well done. I especially love the part where the Doctor pushes his face against the glass and says 'Jack' in this manner I can't even describe.
Where did the news from Moffat come from? I'll be interested to see what he does with a pre-established creature. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:52 am |
|
|
There's a moment in that conversation where Tennant just randomly sticks his finger in his eye, rubbing something away. The mannerisms like that were an excellent touch to highlight how rarely candid that moment was. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baron Patsy whiny, oversensitive, socially awkward

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:14 am |
|
|
| Westacular wrote: |
| There's a moment in that conversation where Tennant just randomly sticks his finger in his eye, rubbing something away. The mannerisms like that were an excellent touch to highlight how rarely candid that moment was. |
I was actually just going to point that out. I think that in general, Tennant is amazing in terms of his mannerisms. He improves so many scenes with just his body language. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:51 am |
|
|
| Ashura wrote: |
| Also, I want to say: The scene between the Doctor and Jack when he's in the radiation room was so well done. I especially love the part where the Doctor pushes his face against the glass and says 'Jack' in this manner I can't even describe. |
I know. That might just be the moment of the episode. That, and the weird evolving expression that comes after. I also really like a shot after they bolt out of the room, where Tennant grabs an old-fashioned phone off the wall and it suddenly looks like a scene out of The China Syndrome -- this huge bank of electronic stuff embedded into the wall, the askew angle, Tennant's wild hair.
Then of course there's the "YANA" and the screaming regeneration.
Cybermen: it seems Moffat said something vague to this effect in the most recent issue of DWM. I'm not sure precisely what he said, though. Something about making them "silent". |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:26 pm |
|
|
Casting news.
I, uh, wonder if this will be a Krillitane episode. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:16 pm |
|
|
That's awesome. I wonder if he'll be using an accent or not. I just read an interview with him where he was asked if he'd ever consider playing the Doctor. He said that hell yes he would do it, but that the bloke who's playing him right now is amazing and isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
Also, as per what Jack's purpose is- I'm pretty sure they brought him into Utopia specifically to be a red herring as to who the Professor really is.
My friend who had no notion of the Master at all kept saying 'He's Jack, he's got to be!'
You know, I got to thinking about all the fan hoopla concerning 'Jack is the Master.' The way this scenario works, with the weird time out-of-order thing- Jack could actually be Professor Yana and then the Master and it really wouldn't matter all that much. The end of the universe is so far off, it's almost inconsequential to Jack. I mention this because this is one of the reasons I doubt this is the big realization that happens. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:44 pm |
|
|
Yeah, James Marsters sounds ... wrong ... without his fake British accent.
None of that Jack = the Master stuff makes the slightest bit of sense. It's just people reading too much into the Doctor's "you could still be here" comment.
In terms of playing a role in the story, Jack is probably there for a combination of:
-A convenient device for the exposition of all sorts of continuity and Time Lordy issues.
-He can do things no one else can.
-He's immortal and the Master isn't but (judging from The Lazarus Experiment) still wants to be.
From a wider perspective, it also provides an opportunity to explain what happened to him between Parting of the Ways and Torchwood, and to provide closure regarding that, freeing Torchwood season 2 from some of its former constraints.
The year 100 trillion is almost incomprehensibly far-flung.
Let's say that we rescale that to human terms: the life-span of universe is 75 years. That means that the entire history of the universe to date -- roughly 14 billion years -- represents slightly under 4 days. To the dying universe, even the Face of Boe and the Time Lords are just little blips on this scale -- things that lasted for just the first few days after it was born, 75 years ago. That previously ridiculously far-flung future of New Earth in the year 5 billion was still during the first week of this life. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:42 pm |
|
|
There's also a certain parallel in that (if what I'm assuming is correct) the Doctor left both of them behind for a very, very long time and kind of forgot about them.
Yeah, as I get older I keep getting more and more astonished with how quickly human culture developed. A thousand years really isn't that long a timeframe, and there are only a few of them since we developed written language.
Even though I know James Marsters is an American, I'm always thinking of him as a British actor. Like, I expect to see him turn up in ITV series.
That is a good point about the possible misdirection for people who aren't paying attention. There's that whole deal with Jack still probably being around at the end of the universe, and how he should try meeting himself. Of course this doesn't really make sense past that immediate "aha" level. I guess that never stops anyone, though. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:15 am |
|
|
Meanwhile, John Barrowman -- "the American" -- actually is a British citizen, who's spent his first 8 and the last 17 years living there. According to his Wikipedia entry he jumps into his original Scottish accent when in the company of his parents or other Scots.
Man, that makes me wish that he'd been the companion for Tooth and Nail instead of Rose. That would have been fun. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:29 am |
|
|
| Eric-Jon Rössel Waugh wrote: |
There's also a certain parallel in that (if what I'm assuming is correct) the Doctor left both of them behind for a very, very long time and kind of forgot about them.
Even though I know James Marsters is an American, I'm always thinking of him as a British actor. Like, I expect to see him turn up in ITV series. |
Well, even if the Doctor only abandoned Jack for a year or two, to Jack it's been a lot longer.
And ditto on Marsters. He's talked about how he worked with Anthony Head on it for quite some time, and that they became good friends. He said a lot of it is an imitation of how Head really talks vs. the Giles character. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:15 am |
|
|
You have to admire "I developed the character's accent by imitating how my castmate actually talks" -- either for boldness, or for camaraderie. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:46 am |
|
|
| Quick question- Did they confirm if they're doing a Christmas Special this year or not? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:08 pm |
|
|
Yeah, Davies has been claiming to be working on the script for months now. I don't know if he just has a work ethic like mine or he's putting a hell of a lot of effort in.
| John Simm wrote: |
| I've tried to explain to my son that his dad is going to be, like, the epitome of evil, but if I say, 'I have a fight with Doctor Who,' and ask him who he wants to win, he'll say Doctor Who! It's one of those opportunities, though, to impress your son in a massive way, and that was just too good to turn down. Julie Gardner was trying to find something for me to do in it, and I kept saying, 'Look, I'm not being painted blue!' And then Julie and Russell T Davies said, 'What about the Master?' As soon as they said that, I was like, 'You're kidding? Oh yeah!' I got really excited about it, but I just had to sit on the news. I wanted to tell people, 'I'M GOING TO BE THE MASTER!!!' But it was a secret. Hmft. |
| OG news page wrote: |
| Plus showrunner Russell T Davies tells the story of how he resurrected the Master ("Did you hear me say that I didn't like the Master, and didn't want him back? Well, I was lying!") and DWM visits a haunted house to find out how Blink was brought to our screens. Meanwhile, there's a look at the darker side of the Doctor's nature, as we wonder whether his punishment of the Family of Blood is a sign of things to come... |
Also, kind of fun trailer.
EDIT: So Freema has been a little fed up with the rumors, I guess, as she's now telling people flat-out, over and over, that she's staying on for next year. With Tennant not going away any time soon, I guess we've finally got some stability in the cast.
Two solid years of consistency is a rare thing in this series; there are only so many examples, and they're mostly kind of iconic pairings. Seven and Ace. Five and Tegan. Four and Sarah-Jane. Four and Romana. Four and K-9. Three and Jo. Three and the Brigadier/UNIT. Two and Jamie. One, Ian, and Barbara (nearly). |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:08 pm |
|
|
Uh, uh, uh. So I guess we know now how the Master got where he was.
I wonder- Toclophane. Time Lord minds in.. spheres?
Also, the fact that James Marsters is doing an episode of Torchwood. They must have the budget for special guests this year!
It looks like the post-episode rush has hammered Outpost Gallifrey. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:54 pm |
|
|
| Man, how do you download the things this quickly? If they take me three hours to torrent, it's a good week. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:24 pm |
|
|
Abuse of the Tardis! Bet you didn't know I was a Time Lord.
Who says I download it though? Fuufuufuu.
Also: Old-Doctor's face reminded me kind of the Face of Boe. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
KonamiCode

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:17 am |
|
|
Davies' scripts sure do have an awful lot of running, it seems. _________________ THAT GIRL ON THE INTERWEB WILL NEVER LOVE YOU
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Westacular

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Waterloo-ish, ON, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:22 am |
|
|
Well! Most of the speculations I made were completely wrong. Looks like all that stuff at the end of the universe wasn't important after all... although there is still space for a Face of Boe connection, but I can't even begin to guess what it might be.
And, uh, wow.
So... the Earth's population is currently estimated to be roughly 6.6 billion people. And 90% of that is a nice round 6 billion. Which would be extremely convenient if you just happened to have 6 billion of something!
You could have a field day breaking down all the themes and leitmotifs referenced in the music here. Notably a Martha-tized version of Doomsday!
I wonder if there is some metaphorically significant link between Teletubbies and the oddly childish Toclophane. The episode was certainly setting something up there. _________________ Wii: 8631 7977 8603 8071 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baron Patsy whiny, oversensitive, socially awkward

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 6:04 am |
|
|
That was, uh, pretty bad? Hopefully the next episode will be a bit better.
Looks like next year's buzzword or whatever might be "Civilization Zero". It was on the list of Polly's DVDs in Blink, and on the BBC Doctor Who website there's a little graphic of the Doctor, Jack, and Martha, and behind them is a billboard that alternates between "Vote Saxon", "LazLabs", and an ad for Civilization Zero on DVD.
Edit: So what do you all figure the Toclaphanes (spelling?) were? The people who left for Utopia? I don't know, I get the feeling I'm way off on that.
Actually, the more I think about that, the less it seems to make sense. I honestly don't know. And what's the deal with the Paradox Machine or whatever? It was never really explained. Does it allow the user to mess about with time-lines or something? Maybe they explained it and I just missed it?
I downloaded season one of Torchwood. On the third episode. It's, um. Not particularly good. I had seen the first episode and half of the second before, and just never really had the motivation to watch the rest.
That parody that I posted a link to a page or so back was scarily accurate, from what I've seen so far.
Owen is really odd looking and kind of an obnoxious fuck, but he's probably my favourite character. Jack acts completely differently. I don't much care for him on here, which is odd considering I rather like him on Who. There was a shot in the first episode that just made me crack up. Jack was standing on top of a tall white building, just looking out at the city. The camera revolved around him a few times, and it was accompanied by really horrible music. It just seemed so ridiculous and totally unnecessary. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Ashura

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: Far East of Eden
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:46 am |
|
|
If you want the Torchwood cliffnotes, pretty much:
Cyberwoman
Small Worlds (only for the Jack's past stuff, otherwise iffy)
They Keep Killing Suzie
Random Shoes
Out of Time
Captain Jack Harkness
End of Days
The rest is kinda eh. Aderack might disagree. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
108 fairy godmilf

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: oakland, california
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:28 pm |
|
|
| Eric-Jon Rössel Waugh wrote: |
| Man, how do you download the things this quickly? If they take me three hours to torrent, it's a good week. |
I always get the ones with about 6,000 seeds on Demonoid, and they download at about two megabytes per second! _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:43 pm |
|
|
| Ashura wrote: |
| The rest is kinda eh. Aderack might disagree. |
Nah, you pretty much got it. The first episode is pretty important, and "Suzie" is only really significant as a pair with it. Though Patsy's seen the first couple already, so, well, okay.
Note that Suzie's plot is kind of ludicrous. If you can overlook the gaping problems with the story itself, the episode does some great stuff with the characters and plays with some neat themes. The tone is nice, too.
Random Shoes is one of the better episodes, though it's also barely a Torchwood episode. It's like Love & Monsters without the Abzorbaloff, basically.
If you want an even more stripped-down list, then go with Everything Changes, Cyberwoman, Small Worlds, Out of Time, CJH/End of Days. All of those either establish some Jackstory or set up the greater context of the series. Had the first series just consisted of these six episodes, it would have been pretty consistent.
--
So, uh. I've been trying to figure out what to say about The Sound of Drums. I'm still not sure that I know. I guess... well, here:
* Information overload. Backstory, references. Holy shit. Too much to process.
* Not a lot really happening; just building tension. That's okay, though. Probably appropriate for the middle part of a three-parter.
* Floating aircraft carrier? O... kay. On second viewing, I notice the Master built it in part from the TARDIS. That makes a little more sense. Still, uh. Hm.
* "Laser screwdriver"? I guess it was set up by the Doctor's "laser spanner". How does that drive screws, though, I wonder? Where did his tissue compression eliminator get off to?
* Oh dear lord, is that aging makeup terrible. Why, when it was so good in earlier episodes? Perhaps the way it was shot? Also, this seems like an even less practical stand-in for the TCE's effects.
* Speaking of shooting: not sure how thrilled I am with the direction. Colin Teague did great stuff with Invasion of the Bane. Here, I kind of was wishing for Graeme Harper.
* I love the mythology Davies has given the Master. This is the first time we're really told anything about him.
* Simm has to return in the role. Somehow.
I enjoyed the episode up until the aging business, which, uh... just seems bizarre and gratuitous at this point. And again, which wasn't executed well. Somehow that's enough to leave me unsure what to feel.
So I guess let's ignore that and focus on the wanky details. I believe this is the first time it's been stated that the Doctor and the Master deliberately chose their own names, under mutually understood circumstances.
Some early background, I guess, for why the Doctor felt compelled to go rogue. Presumably there were more immediate and tangible reasons as well. Also, perhaps some explanation for why the Master has been more and more nutso with each incarnation: the drums just keep getting louder.
The business with the TARDIS keys, and wandering around unnoticed, is pretty great. Sort of a videogame moment.
I'm kind of glad to see the TARDIS being torn apart, actually -- just because it seems so profane.
The Master's wife is pretty awesome.
The tearing open of the sky worked a lot better than it probably should have.
Hey, so that's a pretty elegant way of explaining how the Master got here from the TV movie. For such an oblique explanation, it sure sounds specific.
Davies has kind of impressed me in how well he set up then deliberately foiled expectations. The "secret brother" thing is just the most obvious example. Outside of the broad strokes of plotting, pretty much nothing went as signaled yet generally made about as much sense anyway.
Speaking of signals, I even like the mixed signals in the last few moments, with the dance music playing as horrible things are happening, and it's unclear exactly how the audience is expected to react. Is this.. a camp moment? Is it supposed to be dramatic? What are they going for here? Something feels appropriate about that. Just the insanity of it. That it doesn't make an easy sort of sense. Much better than on-the-nose dramatic punctuation.
Just... yeah. I don't know why the aging thing bothers me so much.
Last edited by aderack on Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
vf10a
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:06 pm |
|
|
| Eric-Jon Rössel Waugh wrote: |
* Information overload. Backstory, references. Holy shit. Too much to process. |
Absolutely how I felt. The episode just felt a bit all over the place and I didn't feel as focused on watching it as normal.
| Eric-Jon Rössel Waugh wrote: |
Just... yeah. I don't know why the aging thing bothers me so much. |
This bothered me as well. I think it's just because (at the moment) it served very little purpose. The doctor could have just been restrained in some way and it wouldn't have changed the remainder of the episode much. I guess it could set up some kind of clever trap that simultaneously rejuvenates the doctor while aging the master to defeat him? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
aderack
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:14 pm |
|
|
Yeah, I expect that'll make more sense next week. For the moment, though, kinda... ew.
I really appreciate the weight of information packed into this episode. It's just really hard to absorb, though. There's no time to integrate it before they rocket on to the next detail. I kept rewinding and listening to discussions over and over, realizing that I kept glazing over each time it played. Almost like the episode had its own perception filter.
I guess the whole idea of the episode was to smack the audience over the head with "What the fuck was that?!". And in that regard, it certainly delivered.
Oh, something I didn't mention: I actually laughed out loud several times, on first viewing -- sometimes violently and unexpectedly. Most of it was due to Simm, yes. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|