|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
inmatarian wisecracking robot

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Bronx Industries
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:51 pm Post subject: Children of Men thread |
|
|
See this movie if you haven't already.
Spoilers from this point on.
I really liked this film. I totally picked up on all of the subtle political commentaries throughout the film, like Michael Caine's little thing about the government allowing the sale of suicide kits, but still keeping marijuana illegal. Plus, that scene where everyone stopped fighting for a moment to listen to the baby cry. Leave it to a Science Fiction film to come up with such a great scene while the rest of modern cinema drops the damn ball. _________________
2993 badness blog email |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dracko a sapphist fool

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:55 pm |
|
|
Best use of cinéma vérité and continuous shots techniques in ages.
Thematically, what I love the most about it is that it deals with actual human beings instead of the one-liner-cracking half-retarded bad-asses you tend to see in modern "commentary" cinema and left any and all moral and political lessons solely up to you. It wasn't aptronising, and thus, it was all the more effective.
And the backstory written in the details. That's great, and most stories should be that way. It's not important to know what happened in a character or areas' past to make them any less interesting. Their past should speak for itself, and this film exemplified that on all points. A good film is one that allows the viewer to create, through an orchestration of impressions, the meaning of its events. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
inmatarian wisecracking robot

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Bronx Industries
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:55 am |
|
|
Those continuous scenes were great. The one scene with the blood on the camera tipped me off as to where the cut points were, but they were so seamless that I wouldn't have figured it out otherwise.
And yeah, the way they worked the character's stories into the story itself is the way it should be done. I can accept the first 5 to 10 minutes of a movie being a little expositiony. That's needed for us to learn how to watch this movie. But then, that's it. _________________
2993 badness blog email |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Capt. Caveman

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Location: behind the wall of sleep
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:14 am |
|
|
| Is this limited release? I've been looking forward to it for a while. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
DarwinMayflower

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:49 am |
|
|
| Like I said before in the movie thread. I'm fucking pissed beyond belief that Canada is probably not going to see the light of day of this film. It's only playing in Toronto so it seems, but what's worst is my vacation to a larger city sort of expected this film to make an appearance in order appreciate visiting a bigger city. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Duckzero

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Microsoft Land
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:14 pm |
|
|
I just finished watching this movie. I was blown away by how character driven it was, rather than plot driven. Few films pull that off really well. One thing I greatly appreciated is how they never, ever explain how the women become infertile, but all of the things, Michael Caine spoke of earlier in the film were completely present, and each one could be a cause. The pollution in the movie was crazy, the amount of drug advertisements were out of control, maybe the "illegal" drug usage, the overcrowding (which in turn might have been natures way of cutting the population down) and government experiments.
I was also reading the imdb boards, and it's funny because someone was complaining that Kee was an immigrant Black woman. Now that argument is rather silly because the whole theme (I believe) that an immigrant was the first to have a child, is because of the rampant poverty, lack of health care, and overall, lower life expectancy rate, which contributed to Kee being the first to have a child in 18 years. Unlike the other side of society seen in the beginning of the film where everything was artificially maintained and created, except for life, due to the sterility of the environment.
Yeah, either way, great film. Very thought provoking! _________________ Keepin' it real like Oatmeal |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
inmatarian wisecracking robot

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Bronx Industries
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:41 pm |
|
|
| Duckzero wrote: |
| One thing I greatly appreciated is how they never, ever explain how the women become infertile, but all of the things, Michael Caine spoke of earlier in the film were completely present, and each one could be a cause. |
I love when stories do this. It's so close to how reality actually works, and it always hangs that mystery on the story that keeps you going and paying attention. _________________
2993 badness blog email |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Wilkes the lester bangs of selectbutton posting

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: i'm here.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 2:00 am |
|
|
this movie is not playing near me : O
I might need to go to NYC for dis |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
duomo

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:56 am |
|
|
| Just wait until Friday, Wilkes. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baron Patsy whiny, oversensitive, socially awkward

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 2:44 pm |
|
|
| I'm about to watch this. I'm rather excited! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GalaxyHead

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Discrimination of male social status by female hamsters
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 4:51 pm |
|
|
| Going to see it Friday, even if it kills me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baron Patsy whiny, oversensitive, socially awkward

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 4:53 pm |
|
|
| About half way through as we speak. This is my kind of movie! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
km

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Minor character in a frame story
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 4:42 am |
|
|
I just saw it, and I agree on all points.
I need more time to process this movie in order to say more, though. _________________
vi) RPGs (Role-Playing Games)
For adolescents; half-formed personalities roaming (in packs) in search of identity. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:59 am Post subject: Re: Children of Men thread |
|
|
| inmatarian wrote: |
| I totally picked up on all of the subtle political commentaries throughout the film, like Michael Caine's little thing about the government allowing the sale of suicide kits, but still keeping marijuana illegal. Plus, that scene where everyone stopped fighting for a moment to listen to the baby cry. Leave it to a Science Fiction film to come up with such a great scene while the rest of modern cinema drops the damn ball. |
While I will agree that this is a totally great movie, having just returned from seeing it, the poliitical commentar yin the film is not too subtle at all. I mean, you are pretty regularly bombarded with imagery tying what is happening in the movie to today, and specifically the Iraq war. Now granted, compared to most movies, this is subtle, but I still, overall, would say it was relatively blatant as a whole.
I did like this movie quite a lot. I found particularly interesting how the future was protrayed as being onyl slightly different in terms of technology and such. It is something that is kind of coming into its own in modern scifi cinema. For example, A Scanner Darkly didn't try too much to make it the OMFG FUTURE. They had a couple fo different things, but nothing too completely different technologically. It worked really well in Children of Men though.
I do have to say that the thing I found most effective about the movie was how harrowing the combat was. IT was never anybody being a badass, or saving the day, or anything, just a bunch of people shooting and trying to not get shot. There wasn't even any sort of narration going on to give it context most of the time (for example, Saving Private Ryan had some pretty hairy combat sequences that were somewhat similarly done, but regularly characters would talk and tell you where things were going and how they were going to ge there. Not so much in Children of Men).
Just the violence of the movie in general was so stark and generally painful to see. It worked well with the movie. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Wall of Beef

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Fart Beach
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:40 am Post subject: Re: Children of Men thread |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
While I will agree that this is a totally great movie, having just returned from seeing it, the poliitical commentar yin the film is not too subtle at all. I mean, you are pretty regularly bombarded with imagery tying what is happening in the movie to today, and specifically the Iraq war. Now granted, compared to most movies, this is subtle, but I still, overall, would say it was relatively blatant as a whole. |
Well you have to assume that since the whole infertility deal began in 2009, the last war that would have been a big issue that they would be protesting would have been the Iraq war. That basically the world stopped as it was at that point and began to become this marshall law state 20 years later. _________________
Tumblr |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Business

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Hiding
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:43 am |
|
|
I wouldn't mind a couple of those monitors that they had at the Ministry of Energy.
I wasn't particularly blown away by the movie. As a post-apocalypse fanboy extraordinare, I felt that they could have done something more with the scenario. Though that would defy the character driven nature of the film. I guess my problem here is that the characters really weren't particularly interesting to me. They felt very predictable.
However, those long takes were nuts. Completely nuts. _________________ Taking a break. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dracko a sapphist fool

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 10:31 am Post subject: Re: Children of Men thread |
|
|
| Wall of Beef wrote: |
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
While I will agree that this is a totally great movie, having just returned from seeing it, the poliitical commentar yin the film is not too subtle at all. I mean, you are pretty regularly bombarded with imagery tying what is happening in the movie to today, and specifically the Iraq war. Now granted, compared to most movies, this is subtle, but I still, overall, would say it was relatively blatant as a whole. |
Well you have to assume that since the whole infertility deal began in 2009, the last war that would have been a big issue that they would be protesting would have been the Iraq war. That basically the world stopped as it was at that point and began to become this marshall law state 20 years later. |
I'm not one to go on and on about how every movie in the past five years has been "omgosh political", but it made sense to me that the world of the future would still be suffering, or profiting, from the repercussions of Western influence in the Middle-East. Maybe it was a statement on Iraq, but it ddidn't feel nearly patronising enough in that way. Besides, the UK going marshal and closing its borders is hardly a stretch.
| Quote: |
| They felt very predictable. |
No way, man. They felt human. It was refreshing to see honest to God people on the big screen once again, instead of the pretentious muck that's been flung at our faces in recent times. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Faithless Wendy's Hole

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: World 1-1
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:39 am |
|
|
My favorite thing in this movie was the pollution.
It was like the world said, "Fuck. We're all going to die anyway ..."
I wish everyone had been smokers. _________________ my website |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:21 pm |
|
|
Don't get me wrong, the obvious and repeated ties into the Iraq war and such made a lot of sense, and some of them were fairly well done (the ties into Abu Ghraib, for example). I would have found it strange if the movie had left all mention of the Iraq war out of it. I was mostly just pointing out that subtlety was not really even the movie's aim, and certainly was never actually accomplished.
I would be intersted to hear the reactions to the movie of someone who is pro-Iraq war, actually. I've noticed that when people agree with the political views of a work, they tend to be much les harsh on how those views are presented.
I did like the pollution thing as well, Faithless. In fact, I kind of liked that whole attitude to the film. There were a lot of people in the movie who were just saying "fuck it" and doing whatever they want. For example, when the main character SPOILERS asks who the fahter is. Of course Kee (wow not subtle) doesn't know, because hell, if we all thoguht we couldn't get pregnant, everyone would probably fuck like rabbits. END SPOILERS |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
GcDiaz

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Clinton, MA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: Re: Children of Men thread |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
I did like this movie quite a lot. I found particularly interesting how the future was protrayed as being onyl slightly different in terms of technology and such. It is something that is kind of coming into its own in modern scifi cinema. For example, A Scanner Darkly didn't try too much to make it the OMFG FUTURE. They had a couple fo different things, but nothing too completely different technologically. It worked really well in Children of Men though.
|
I noticed that, how there was nothing fantastic about it. It occurred to me that knowledge of your impending extinction might do a thing or two to halt sceintific progress. Then again, we never really explored the "cleaner" areas of the world, so maybe all the doodahs and doohickeys were reserved for the privileged. I know one area that saw definite progress was "life extension", what with all the plastic surgery and god knows what else. I guess "life reduction" got the same treatment too. _________________ Steam/PSN/Xbawks: GcDiaz
Let's bring sexy back!
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:29 pm |
|
|
| well, we did see the cousin's house, where the young guy was playing with that wierd cube on mini projection screen thing. Like it seemed like technology advanced a little beyond our own, but then stagnated, even for the rich like the cousin. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dracko a sapphist fool

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:54 pm |
|
|
Who says stagnation? It's sci-fi, that doesn't mean it has to be garish about it.
And I'm really not seeing the Abu Ghraib reference. Is it to do with the militant attitudes against deportees? It's not like bags on heads is anything particularly new. The film, which remains an adaptation of a 15 year-old book, is clearly dealing with fears linked to comtemporary events, but there's nothing in it that seems to condemn the Iraq war, at least that I could see. Which was refreshing, actually. I'm tired of the molly-coddling fare as of late. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Wall of Beef

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Fart Beach
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:00 pm |
|
|
I don't think the movie has any thing to do with the Iraq war. Its just that it was the last War before the world went to shit with the infertility, and that the characters happened to be activists at one time. They could have forwarded history and have some sort of North Korean war be mentioned, but I guess they wanted to connect it more with the current world of the viewer. _________________
Tumblr |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:17 pm |
|
|
| dude, i mean, the wall of articles and posters and shit about the iraq war wasn't enough of a tip off? the martial law on the streets, the insurgence, the fricking parade with the dead body and the people shouting in arabic while holding up banners? I mean, it might not be specifically iraq (though i think it is) but it is most certainly the middle east. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Wall of Beef

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Fart Beach
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:39 pm |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
| dude, i mean, the wall of articles and posters and shit about the iraq war wasn't enough of a tip off? |
Im assuming you mean the stuff within Jaspers house that they panned over? Because that was the only stuff that I remember that specifically mentioned Iraq.
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
| the martial law on the streets, the insurgence, the fricking parade with the dead body and the people shouting in arabic while holding up banners? I mean, it might not be specifically iraq (though i think it is) but it is most certainly the middle east. |
The martial law, insurgence, and the parade was all because they were all refugees that just rose up and were in a fight with the British Goverment. The arabic chanting and carrying banners probably had to due with that they were immigrants from the middle east and were reverting back to their own Nationalisim after getting free from the cages/camps the british were putting them in. There were plenty of non-middle eastern people in that parade too who were firing guns off into the air and such. _________________
Tumblr |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:51 pm |
|
|
Of course there are logical explanations in the movie for the parade and all that. If there weren't, it would be a stupid movie. However, the images presented were drawing on the modern presentation of the wars in the middle east. You can't think that the choice to have a parade like that in the middle of his movie was just the dircetor saying "eh, maybe i will make them...uhhh...middle eastern?" There is a clear significance to such a choice.
The constant use of the term Homeland Security for the British military is also significant. Yes, the term existed pre-9/11 and all, but it's rise in prominent usage can be directly seen to corrsepond to the fallout from 9/11. This movie is not just drawing on the Iraq war, but is drawing on all of the hysteria that has come out of the usage of modern terrorist tactics in the "civilized" west. The opening bombing sets up that the use of terrorist warfare has become rather common place in modern london, pretty similar to how it has become common place in, say, bahgdad.
The paranoia of the British in seeming to export immigrants for no good reason is only a few short steps away from what the US government was looking to do immediately following 9/11. The movie is taking what has been happening since 9/11 (including the IRaq war) and saying that this (the ruling state of paranoia and fear, not neccessarily the infertility) is the result of it all. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
inmatarian wisecracking robot

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Bronx Industries
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:59 am |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
Of course there are logical explanations in the movie for the parade and all that. If there weren't, it would be a stupid movie. However, the images presented were drawing on the modern presentation of the wars in the middle east. You can't think that the choice to have a parade like that in the middle of his movie was just the dircetor saying "eh, maybe i will make them...uhhh...middle eastern?" There is a clear significance to such a choice.
The constant use of the term Homeland Security for the British military is also significant. Yes, the term existed pre-9/11 and all, but it's rise in prominent usage can be directly seen to corrsepond to the fallout from 9/11. This movie is not just drawing on the Iraq war, but is drawing on all of the hysteria that has come out of the usage of modern terrorist tactics in the "civilized" west. The opening bombing sets up that the use of terrorist warfare has become rather common place in modern london, pretty similar to how it has become common place in, say, bahgdad.
The paranoia of the British in seeming to export immigrants for no good reason is only a few short steps away from what the US government was looking to do immediately following 9/11. The movie is taking what has been happening since 9/11 (including the IRaq war) and saying that this (the ruling state of paranoia and fear, not neccessarily the infertility) is the result of it all. |
All of this I agree with. The beauty of this film is that they used that fancy french word, mise-en-guarde, to put this in front of us as a possibility. They didn't go on a hot-dog eating Michael Moore style rant trying to shove it down our throats. In fact, they really didn't even talk about ways to correct the problems. I think the only suggestion was that the people we're discriminating against are the ones who are going to run the world when we're gone, since, the child was born to an immigrant, and would not be a white person when he grew up.
This movie was more of speculative fiction than science fiction. _________________
2993 badness blog email |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
boojiboy7 narcissistic irony-laden twat

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: take me on a blatant doom trip.
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:31 am |
|
|
Oh, yeah, as a political piece, I like it a lot better than michael moore. though, shit, I tend to think Moore does more harm than good.
Speculative ficiton is just a word lit writers use when they want to write sci fi but dont want it ending up in the sci fi section of the book store. Just saying. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Duckzero

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Microsoft Land
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:49 am |
|
|
| boojiboy7 wrote: |
Of course there are logical explanations in the movie for the parade and all that. If there weren't, it would be a stupid movie. However, the images presented were drawing on the modern presentation of the wars in the middle east. You can't think that the choice to have a parade like that in the middle of his movie was just the dircetor saying "eh, maybe i will make them...uhhh...middle eastern?" There is a clear significance to such a choice.
The constant use of the term Homeland Security for the British military is also significant. Yes, the term existed pre-9/11 and all, but it's rise in prominent usage can be directly seen to corrsepond to the fallout from 9/11. This movie is not just drawing on the Iraq war, but is drawing on all of the hysteria that has come out of the usage of modern terrorist tactics in the "civilized" west. The opening bombing sets up that the use of terrorist warfare has become rather common place in modern london, pretty similar to how it has become common place in, say, bahgdad.
The paranoia of the British in seeming to export immigrants for no good reason is only a few short steps away from what the US government was looking to do immediately following 9/11. The movie is taking what has been happening since 9/11 (including the IRaq war) and saying that this (the ruling state of paranoia and fear, not neccessarily the infertility) is the result of it all. |
I agree with all of this also:
The great thing about the movie was the point made about airlines and their security. When the nurse was on the bus and proclaimed her religion rather bluntly, which is the same as a female member of Islam with the headwraps, because it's just there, and how did the guard handle it? Take her out of the line, into a holding area to question her,maybe. But if you see the progression as they drove by, it was obvious that it was the start of her getting executed a few minutes later. _________________ Keepin' it real like Oatmeal |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
alice not nana komatsu

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:45 am |
|
|
| I did not think this movie was all that great :(. Someone slap me with a fish or prove me wrong. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Wall of Beef

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Fart Beach
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:14 am |
|
|
Another thing that kept popping into my head when I was watching this movie, "Man, this looks like an expensive movie." It just looks like they had to do a shit ton of work on these sets and locations just to dirty them up. I guess thats probably not too expensive, but just everything was so authentic looking. Maybe there was more CG than I can tell (a good thing) but either way I was just blown away by every environment and backdrop they traveld through. _________________
Tumblr |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Baron Patsy whiny, oversensitive, socially awkward

Joined: 05 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:25 pm |
|
|
| Wall of Beef wrote: |
| Another thing that kept popping into my head when I was watching this movie, "Man, this looks like an expensive movie." It just looks like they had to do a shit ton of work on these sets and locations just to dirty them up. I guess thats probably not too expensive, but just everything was so authentic looking. Maybe there was more CG than I can tell (a good thing) but either way I was just blown away by every environment and backdrop they traveld through. |
It cost roughly $72 million |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Churippu Mister Mercury

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Flick of the wrist
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:55 am |
|
|
I enjoyed this film alot. I liked how it was pretty much believeable by putting elements in that happen in real life, like the car scene were they couldn't get the car started. That was great! Definately my favorite scene. I got chillbumps when the baby was crying and all the fighting stopped just where they could hear the baby. That was magical.
and yes I cried at the end okay? |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dracko a sapphist fool

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:47 am |
|
|
Who here thinks the ending could have done with being just two or three seconds earlier?
That escape scene was so very, very British. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Wall of Beef

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Fart Beach
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:55 am |
|
|
| Dracko wrote: |
| Who here thinks the ending could have done with being just two or three seconds earlier? |
Do you mean not showing the ship "Tomorrow" arriving? Or literally cutting 2 or 3 seconds of footage of the dingy floating in the water?
Or I suppose you mean the voice over of her saying the child was fine or whatever. _________________
Tumblr |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dracko a sapphist fool

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:59 am |
|
|
| Wall of Beef wrote: |
| Dracko wrote: |
| Who here thinks the ending could have done with being just two or three seconds earlier? |
Do you mean not showing the ship "Tomorrow" arriving? Or literally cutting 2 or 3 seconds of footage of the dingy floating in the water?
Or I suppose you mean the voice over of her saying the child was fine or whatever. |
I mean cutting out everything right from the point the ship is shown, that part included.
The voice-over definitely felt unnecessary to me. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Apol king of zembla

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: a curiously familiar pit
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:39 pm |
|
|
i hope metal gear solid 4 plays like how this movie looked. _________________
 |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Wall of Beef

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Fart Beach
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:50 pm |
|
|
| Mr. Apol wrote: |
| i hope metal gear solid 4 plays like how this movie looked. |
Theo did not have the luxury of a suit that just chameleons to whatever texture you touch. _________________
Tumblr |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
skonrad

Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Location: Vizzyvancizzouver
|
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:44 am |
|
|
| Anyone got a feminist read on this? The trailer made it look like the film might not address any of the latent misogyny of the subject matter. Plus I read somewhere that the director changed the story from the original book's concept so that it was the women who were infertile rather than the men (or both depending on the read), which doesn't bode well for my ability to sit through the movie without sighing a lot. But I'm willing to believe that it was a shitty trailer like everyone said!! |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
Dracko a sapphist fool

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:05 am |
|
|
I don't see why you'd sigh about something so insignificant.
Incidentally, no, the men are still barren. |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
inmatarian wisecracking robot

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Location: Bronx Industries
|
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:40 am |
|
|
| Churippu wrote: |
| I got chillbumps when the baby was crying and all the fighting stopped just where they could hear the baby. That was magical. |
Totally. Theo dying, that wasn't all that bad. But the baby crying and the fighting stopping. That was really something. _________________
2993 badness blog email |
|
| Filter / Back to top |
|
 |
|