|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
DarwinMayflower

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:49 am |
|
|
| Like I said before in the movie thread. I'm fucking pissed beyond belief that Canada is probably not going to see the light of day of this film. It's only playing in Toronto so it seems, but what's worst is my vacation to a larger city sort of expected this film to make an appearance in order appreciate visiting a bigger city. |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
 |
DarwinMayflower

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:02 am |
|
|
Well folks I finall saw it. And I must say it wasn't what I expected and yet it was what I expected. Now there's going to be a LOT of spoilers, so seriously if any of you are waiting to see this film when it's released on DVD, then I suggest you skip over this review becuase I'm not going to use any of the spoiler tags.
First I've like to address some of the complaints...mainly the thing about being off as most people might think. I share this sentiment because it's not exactly a grand slam home run, however I find it to be a great in-field home run. I think the thing that's a bit off is that there's a great disconnect of the audience with the characters. They do seem like placeholders in some respect and a lot of times you don't exactly have a great emotional connection to care for them. However I think that's part of the charm and part of the reality of the whole situation.
I now understand why people say it's such a great film in showing a potential future of the world or even showing the world how it is right now but only less agressive. But I think one of the strengths of the film is how dismal they paint the world in Children of Men. It's not sad in a boo-hoo way, but a sad in a pathetic way, sad in a hopeless way and sad in an angry way. You might not get a clear emotional connection with each character but I think that's the point of the film.
People are blunt, people are at wits end and polite society is crumbling before your very eyes. These are not witty lovable jerks like Captain Jack Sparrow or Tyler Durden. These are not masterful characters that have to command the stage and tell us to look at them...they are the lead character they command the attention. These are people who in one way or another lost all hope in living and yet they only live on for some empty reason. All of them are stripped down to their bare essentials with their core primal nature shown for us. And how each person expresses that lost of hope is each unique but much the same.
And that's what's so powerful about this film. It doesn't necessarily take any sides. The Human Project itself seems entirely objective to the world's problems and joining with any sort of group whether it be gov't or Fishers/Resistence/Militia is only a means to an end. Yet at the same time the film manages to show so many sides to humanity. Fanaticism, Gov't tyranny, racism, ignorance, egotistical, multi-culturalism, capitalism, politics, the evils of humans and the inherent good of humans. The list goes incredibly on and on.
It is quite amazing how we get to see so many sides in such a short time. There's a great sense of duality in all shapes and forms in the film. From the media paprazzi and world embracing Diego (the youngest man alive at the time; murdered) we get to see how sensationalized, superficial and useless it is to worship him when in reality he's just a beacon false hope. It's amazing how we never get exposition on Diego too much but following the most important rule of cinema...SHOW not tell. We understand from the get go how much people love Diego and yet for all the wrong reasons. The photograpy crowds trying to get his picture, people trying to get his autograph, Diego himself acting rudely to his so called fans we have a clear understanding from our own experience with tabloid trash tv how he's treated and what he represents.
And yet near the end when our baby gets born and is shown to the world for the first time there's a stark contrast than with Diego. The baby isn't a celebrity or some commodity as Syd so aptly put it; but it's hope. It's the shock of seeing a potential future in a world with no future. With Diego his smile only reflects how doomed society is with their own gluttony and problems, but with the baby...she represents not a reflection but a window into the future. The stark difference between being a child in a society far too superficial to their own good with all the best life has to offer and yet with humanity's problems bleeding through the gates that into the streets; and being a child born in a ghetto, a place of absolute hopelessness and in the middle of a warzone. A lot of people who say having a kid "changes everything" in this case it's very much true.
Another sense of duality is with Theo himself. When he visits his cousin, it's like looking into a mirror with only a child between them. This a subtle yet powerful symbolism that perhaps in some alternate timeline, it would be Theo who owns the aptly shown Picasso painting, Guernica, sipping on wine in great luxary. Had he not lost his own son, perhaps his own son would be famous enough to afford the chances at a luxorious lifestyle with Theo himself ignoring the problems of the world. Everyone deals with the fall of humanity different and while the gates are erected to keep the problems out, much like how Theo's cousin ignores it all; polite and upper crust society knows that in the end it isn't worth it. All they have left is reveling in what's left of their own superficial world like they did in the past but only now they realize how useless it is.
And that's what's great about this film, how hopeless and helpless it makes you feel. Even if you know about the final outcome of a film, even though it's entirely expected for the happy ending to come, there's just so much in the film that slowlly breaks down all your pre-conceived notions of what the typical cinematic storyline is. You begin to doubt that Theo and Kee would ever make to the end as betrayals, deaths of characters and just the sheer obstacles that face them erase any sort of hope. Even the final goal, the Human project is revealed to be more myth than reality later in the film. Cuaron wants to make you feel you're there, you're sharing the moment, you are with them in thier misery and suffering. If cinema is supposed to mimic reality, then this is as real as you can get without teleporting to that world itself.
The cinematography is just great. It's a very scenic film, but it works because it goes a long way to visually show how terrible the world is now. You see everything and it only makes the situation and plotline a lot more focused. No one actor is going to detract from the plotline. But those long shots that Cuaron is known for works in spades here.
The interior car scene, I'm still trying to figure out how they did that. But it's powerful. I love it because it doesn't guide the person through how Theo bests a pair of evil people on the motorbike. There's no close up shot of the door handle, you feel like a passenger and the move is registered almost after the fact but mimics reality just like that.
The climax of the film just makes it incredible by the sheer fact that it pulls no punches. You feel it's there and it only magnifies the sheer hopelessness of a situation. Rambo isn't going to come in to save the day, it's just human determination of Theo. Hope is so far away you can't even see it on the horizon and yet you're still sailing for it imagining where it'll be. That's great filmmaking there, the ability to take let the audience see the world for themselves and not to specfically show them. As mentioned in this quote:
| Quote: |
Q: How important is it for you to advance the technical aspects of filmmaking, such as the long uninterrupted takes? Is that something that's important to you?
A: In terms of the very long takes, from the beginning we said it was going to be the same approach as "Y Tu Mamá Tambičn", in which character is not more important than social environment. So you don't do close-ups to favor character. You stay wide. So your character not only blends with the social environment, but you're hoping to create tension between your character and the social environment. The camera was just there to register that moment of truthfulness. |
In the end I just cried at the moment that Theo and Kee exit the hotel, even if the film felt detatched at times, it did so in order to make a moving point about humanity and the inherent goodness of humanity. That was an extremely powerful moment in a string of many other moments.
As the film nearly ends we see fighter jets above fly to Bexhill of which everyone is gathered there. The Gov't Army, rebels, immigrants and refugees; all sorts of factions who might have prevented Theo and Kee from fullfilling their journey are suddenly eradicated. All the conflict is wiped out in a symbolic cleaning of the slate. As Jasper said, Theo lost his faith due to chance...but he helped give the world a chance by his own faith.
I suggest everyone to go see this film.
Last edited by DarwinMayflower on Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
 |
DarwinMayflower

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:04 pm |
|
|
| Shapermc wrote: |
I think there was one other point where the film was unnecessarily nice to the audience: when Jasper was killed. I mean, ok, the suicide box being open was a nice little joke, and the fact that he made sure his dog and wife would just sit there and starve to death or anything abnormally cruel, but I think that just seeing him walk out to talk with the men would have been enough, they didn't have to stay through the whole damn thing. How they managed to escape after hanging along so long was beyond my ability to suspend disbelief. |
Well I kind of liked that scene mainly for the point of connecting the audience with what the character Theo is feeling. I mean how many times have we've a sacrafice with only a scant few seconds of reflection about the person who died from the protagonist? I think it's somewhat important to show this because this not only makes us feel for Jasper being hurt, but not in such a way that the director force feeds us emotions. It's up to us to take it in as opposed the director showing what to feel as opposed how to feel.
As for being able to escape afterwards, once again I think that the cinematic patterns sort of harewired into our minds. So many times we've seen protagnists hide or view some sort of scene in hiding, only to have some random grunt look out and see them right after the scene happens. I mean sometimes it's complete bullshit that such random people have eagle eyes. If this shit was ever true in reality then I doubt we'd be getting so many reports of ambushes from Iraq. They got away basically because people aren't as superpowered as films make them out to be.
| Quote: |
| So, I guess saying that the film was too nice to the audience isn't right, the film was too kind to the characters. Seriously there was probably like a total of three minutes in the film that if cut out or properly removed would have made this film escalate from very good to amazing for me. As it stands it's just shy of that. I think that I'm more critical of it because it was so good for so much of it, then it put on the kiddie gloves for those few moments. |
Well for me a whole sort of lack of emotional connection with the characters kind of makes the film less than amazing for me. It seemed a bit too caught up in focusing on the situation as opposed to the people. The forest from the trees so to speak. I still like the film as it is because it has a wonderful depth to it all, but it seems more concerned to be the anti-thesis of current cinema than to use what works well and using it to perfection. |
|
| Unfilter / Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|